Tyson Fury post fight interview

Post Reply
nigeltsport
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 168
Joined: 29 Sep 2009, 08:26

Tyson Fury post fight interview

Post by nigeltsport »

No matter what people think of his boxing ability, Tyson always comes across as polite, respectful and ambitious whenever I have interviewed him. Exactly the same last night. Beat whoever is put in front of you and you will progress. Maddalone was obviously selected as an opponent who wouldn't threaten the dream of a fight with Wladimir and so it proved, but Tyson did the job admirably in my opinion and now he is that bit closer to the world title fight. Well done ! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NN-vMLfUvHs&feature=plcp
yiddo14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Tyson Fury post fight interview

Post by yiddo14 »

He won't get any further if his choice of opponent is based on not threatening to jeopardize a Wlad fight! Who next? Monte Barrett?
THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6646
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Re: Tyson Fury post fight interview

Post by THEBUTCH »

Good interview. Fury knows the games and makes some intelligent, realistic comments. Personally I'd be in no rush with Fury, he's got a good thing going with live saturday night ch5 coverage. Probably got double the viewers of any other british boxing show that night. Hennesy could do with delivering an opponent close to world class next time, but I'm enjoying the show so far. Fury never ceases to entertain.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17110
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Tyson Fury post fight interview

Post by keithmoonhangover »

I would have Johnathon Banks, Kevin Johnson or Shane Cameron.

Fury would beat any of those three without too much trouble.
stac
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 502
Joined: 08 Jan 2002, 20:00

Re: Tyson Fury post fight interview

Post by stac »

my father agrees with the top comment...he seems a nice articulate decent guy...but frankly Maddalone was awful...but guess thats the way the managers want it....
Stevolad
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 106
Joined: 16 Sep 2011, 17:37

Re: Tyson Fury post fight interview

Post by Stevolad »

The lads only 23 years old, what's the rush???? Let him build his way up, what's the point in throwing him in with a Klitschko to get ruined. He's active and learning his trade so let him work his way up and get plenty more experience IMO
Bennyblanco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 967
Joined: 19 Jul 2009, 05:01

Re: Tyson Fury post fight interview

Post by Bennyblanco »

Hennessy was talking about ademek after the fight, would like to see how he copes with him. Wether it will happen is a different story though.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Tyson Fury post fight interview

Post by crusader »

I think that Fury would beat Adamek.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Tyson Fury post fight interview

Post by whiskey »

I'd say Adamek would be (size wise) a good opponent indeed.

Drug test him though. His increase in mass from 175lb is fishy at best.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Tyson Fury post fight interview

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

His problem is the same as Price's. How the hell do you match these guys?

Heavyweight just has a bunch of recycled 'contenders' hanging around like a bad smell hoping for a callup for a payday with a Klitschko. They won't fight anyone else. Someone mentioned Shane Cameron, Kevin Johnson, and someone else. But why would they want the fight? Maybe with the increased exposure for Hennessey he could find the money to get Fury a fight with this level of competitor, who will demand money. But what about Price? Has Maloney got the same level of resources?

Then there are journeymen. They'll fight, for varying degrees of money, but varying degrees of usefulness. Who's in between? Euro level? How do you get a euro title callup vs Pulev? Won't he be waiting on a Klitschko too? Why would euro-level guys like Dimitrenko risk fighting Price?

Noone wants to fight, there's no real way of building a fighter in HW. It's depressing.

Fury is young so he can fight tough journeymen for a while. But it kind of makes no sense since he has already beaten Chisora to take a step back.

Price however needs to get a move on!

I really feel for the promoters as there just aren't a lot of options out there. It doesn't help that both these guys will be competing for meaningful opponents at this stage.
Tunney
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 274
Joined: 21 Jun 2007, 22:16

Re: Tyson Fury post fight interview

Post by Tunney »

keithmoonhangover wrote:I would have Johnathon Banks, Kevin Johnson or Shane Cameron.

Fury would beat any of those three without too much trouble.
Banks is fighting Seth Mitchell on Sep 15.

Sherman Williams or Shane Cameron (both coming off wins) would be okay. Other decent choices: Carlos Takam, Kevin Johnson, Juan Carlos Gomez and Franklin Lawrence.
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: Tyson Fury post fight interview

Post by bripez »

Riddick Blowe wrote:His problem is the same as Price's. How the hell do you match these guys?
To answer your question, the Promoter needs to take a chance and pay a decent opponent decent dough.

I like Fury, and like him more with each fight (on Saturday he was in the best shape I had seen him and he boxed lovely).

Hennesy is in a difficult position though - Fury was talking about taking on all comers, but Hennesy knows that the golden goose / holy grail of a heavyweight champion will produce massive dividends in the future (the Irish Americans are fed up with Eastern European heavys and will take to him). Fury is still learning and the Klits are getting older.

It is not the anoraks like us who will more than likely tune in anyway, but in order to get (and maintain) the interest of the "man in the street" they need to step up the calibre of opponents.
rhino222
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6618
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 09:38

Re: Tyson Fury post fight interview

Post by rhino222 »

i thought that tyson fury boxed very well saturday night, only managed to watch the fight yesterday but what he did he did well. fights when he has to and spoils in close when he has done his own work, quite a good ethos to be honest. i liked his jab too, very nice.
Shirow
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1718
Joined: 29 Nov 2003, 11:15

Re: Tyson Fury post fight interview

Post by Shirow »

I don't mind a gimme as long as he is kept busy & in this case as it is clear that Fury is improving. His boxing & conditioning were better than ever. It seems like in this case the training camp was the point rather than the opponent.

I like the Adamek idea. He seems like he is reaching the end of the road & despite his skill advantage he'll have a lot of problems with the size and the way Fury fights tall. Can't imagine Fury going over to New Jersey and Ch5 going along with it or them putting up the cash to bring Adamek over here.

One of the old recognisable American names could well be next - Rahman, McCline, Grant even Holyfield or Toney might be the best way to go marketing wise. I'd like Chris Arreola but i think he is waiting on a Wlad shot next year. Maybe even Sam Peter if he hasn't already retired so that he can beat a guy who has fought both Klits and other top HWs.
Post Reply