Ian Tims vs Tony Conquest

Post Reply
clintonmcphilbin
Cruiserweight
Posts: 366
Joined: 26 Jan 2011, 12:49

Ian Tims vs Tony Conquest

Post by clintonmcphilbin »

I think this could be a cracking fight and its on allegedly alot of people will have conquest as fav after is first rnd ko of leon williams and being more well known. But tims is a tough fighter who in my view was robbed in is last fight with a home town verdict. Also tims was a good amateur who if i can remember right was trying to go to the 2008 olympics. Conquest was a good amateur as well winning the aba's. Both fighters av had injury problems timms more so. I think if conquest sticks to is boxing he should win but like i said before tims is a tough fighter and could cause a lot of problems for conquest who was dropped by john anthony. http://boxrec.com/show_display.php?show_id=649273
Londonirish
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3064
Joined: 20 Nov 2008, 13:02

Re: Ian Tims vs Tony Conquest

Post by Londonirish »

clintonmcphilbin wrote: But tims is a tough fighter who in my view was robbed in is last fight with a home town verdict. 3


Heard it was a Very good close fight but the right man won..
I see this being a very good fight to :TU:
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Ian Tims vs Tony Conquest

Post by leforge »

WBO european says it all. Why is this title needed
clintonmcphilbin
Cruiserweight
Posts: 366
Joined: 26 Jan 2011, 12:49

Re: Ian Tims vs Tony Conquest

Post by clintonmcphilbin »

leforge wrote:WBO european says it all. Why is this title needed
Wbo international aswell joke its a good fight on its own merit dont need the titles on top of it. Heard some promoter say he wants to get conquest in the wbo rankings.
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9661
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Re: Ian Tims vs Tony Conquest

Post by steve689 »

Go on Timsy...give to 'em lad :box:
Alexey Uralets
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 121
Joined: 05 Feb 2012, 08:36

Re: Ian Tims vs Tony Conquest

Post by Alexey Uralets »

I'm goin wit Conquest - he is a smart n cleva boxer, i like his style. Only thing he needs - more power n dynamite in his gloves n fists.
clintonmcphilbin
Cruiserweight
Posts: 366
Joined: 26 Jan 2011, 12:49

Re: Ian Tims vs Tony Conquest

Post by clintonmcphilbin »

Really looking forward to this one going to be a belter
slapbangwhallop
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2031
Joined: 13 Dec 2010, 08:27

Re: Ian Tims vs Tony Conquest

Post by slapbangwhallop »

If Timsy wasn't so inactive I fancy him heavily. But as he has had only one fight in over 18 months and it's in Conquests backyard then that evens it up.

You know what they say about fighting a Brit in Britain, "you have to knock him out to get a draw".

Timsy is one seriously tough tough mofo and would go through a wall to get a slap at you. This will be Conquests toughest fight yet, it won't be Tims'.

Also watch out for Anthony Cacace on the undercard.
allahsnackbar
Cruiserweight
Posts: 302
Joined: 18 May 2011, 13:36

Re: Ian Tims vs Tony Conquest

Post by allahsnackbar »

if conquest can't beat tims he should retire
Bronxbull666
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 384
Joined: 16 Aug 2012, 17:00

Re: Ian Tims vs Tony Conquest

Post by Bronxbull666 »

leforge wrote:WBO european says it all. Why is this title needed
It is silly, very unnecessary, however these titles give you a good ranking with the WBO and a good leapfrog. Rightly or wrongly, it'll put fighters in a competitive position.
clintonmcphilbin
Cruiserweight
Posts: 366
Joined: 26 Jan 2011, 12:49

Re: Ian Tims vs Tony Conquest

Post by clintonmcphilbin »

allahsnackbar wrote:if conquest can't beat tims he should retire
Bit harsh i know boxers who have lost to worse and come back better.
iamasadlittleboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1877
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05

Re: Ian Tims vs Tony Conquest

Post by iamasadlittleboy »

Watching the undercard...Daryll Williams is just awful, really, really awful
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4738
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: Ian Tims vs Tony Conquest

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

iamasadlittleboy wrote:Watching the undercard...Daryll Williams is just awful, really, really awful
Don't think he threw a single jab. Bunce etc thinking he's the second coming of Benn.
clintonmcphilbin
Cruiserweight
Posts: 366
Joined: 26 Jan 2011, 12:49

Re: Ian Tims vs Tony Conquest

Post by clintonmcphilbin »

Cracking win for bailey what a finish
iamasadlittleboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1877
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05

Re: Ian Tims vs Tony Conquest

Post by iamasadlittleboy »

clintonmcphilbin wrote:Cracking win for bailey what a finish
Yeah notable upset there, well done to the guy.
clintonmcphilbin
Cruiserweight
Posts: 366
Joined: 26 Jan 2011, 12:49

Re: Ian Tims vs Tony Conquest

Post by clintonmcphilbin »

classic put camara on wrong fighter lol
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4738
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: Ian Tims vs Tony Conquest

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

Good seeing someone like Bailey enjoying some success. He's fought some good undefeated fighters the last few years and had it tough.
safeerah
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1195
Joined: 18 Mar 2010, 07:35

Re: Ian Tims vs Tony Conquest

Post by safeerah »

ShadrachSimmo wrote:
iamasadlittleboy wrote:Watching the undercard...Daryll Williams is just awful, really, really awful
Don't think he threw a single jab. Bunce etc thinking he's the second coming of Benn.
I don't think Williams was interviewed afterwards, everyone else was, I wonder why that was ? Did they forget ? When they announced Tims, the camera was put on Conquest, it was poor show, with a one sided low quality main event.
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4738
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: Ian Tims vs Tony Conquest

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

safeerah wrote:
ShadrachSimmo wrote:
iamasadlittleboy wrote:Watching the undercard...Daryll Williams is just awful, really, really awful
Don't think he threw a single jab. Bunce etc thinking he's the second coming of Benn.
I don't think Williams was interviewed afterwards, everyone else was, I wonder why that was ? Did they forget ? When they announced Tims, the camera was put on Conquest, it was poor show, with a one sided low quality main event.
I noticed that. They put up the wrong records for Louis Byrne i think it was. That ring announcer can't do anything without reading it directly from a card and he still makes mistakes. Saw him at the Kelvin Hall and he messed up a few times.
magnus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1175
Joined: 13 Dec 2004, 08:59

Re: Ian Tims vs Tony Conquest

Post by magnus »

Good win for Conquest, who seems to be progressing well.

Generally though, this was a poor card. I'm glad I recorded it, so I could fast forward most of the "contests". Also, maybe I'm just getting old and biased towards the past, but where are all the punchers these days?
iftkwoody
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 203
Joined: 27 Jul 2010, 03:10

Re: Ian Tims vs Tony Conquest

Post by iftkwoody »

Conquest is a great bloke and a decent fighter I nearly boxed him as an amateur and am looking forward to seeing him progress as a pro. Am looking forward to seeing how far he can go IMHO if he gets the right opportunities at the right time the sky is the limit
Post Reply