Mitchell v Burns undercard?
Mitchell v Burns undercard?
A cracking headline but the support looks particularly dismal.
John Simpson (23-9-0) v Dai Davies (9-18-2) and then 9 House Fighter v TBA's?
Is this simply a case that the headline is that good it doesn't need a worthwhile undercard?
John Simpson (23-9-0) v Dai Davies (9-18-2) and then 9 House Fighter v TBA's?
Is this simply a case that the headline is that good it doesn't need a worthwhile undercard?
Re: Mitchell v Burns undercard?
ive herd martin gethin v carl johanssen 12 rounder for some ibf title being moved on it from the walsall show
-
saturday_kid
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 847
- Joined: 14 May 2009, 04:05
Re: Mitchell v Burns undercard?
Yeah??maley1984 wrote:ive herd martin gethin v carl johanssen 12 rounder for some ibf title being moved on it from the walsall show
Shame for Martin this not being in his hometown - but for purely selfish reasons I'd be glad about this means i'd get to see it. Could be a war that
Re: Mitchell v Burns undercard?
just rumours ive herd i was going to walsall but not if that fights off the card yeah looks a good fight saw martins last couple and he looking goodsaturday_kid wrote:Yeah??maley1984 wrote:ive herd martin gethin v carl johanssen 12 rounder for some ibf title being moved on it from the walsall show
Shame for Martin this not being in his hometown - but for purely selfish reasons I'd be glad about this means i'd get to see it. Could be a war that
Re: Mitchell v Burns undercard?
Really poor under card!
Re: Mitchell v Burns undercard?
Just to let people know, live big fight countdown (Mitchell v burns) on b o x n a t i o n 7:30pm tue, wed, thu next week !
Re: Mitchell v Burns undercard?
Can't see too many casual subscribing for this such shame !jessi wrote:Just to let people know, live big fight countdown (Mitchell v burns) on b o x n a t i o n 7:30pm tue, wed, thu next week !
Re: Mitchell v Burns undercard?
Most people know of theses two guys now, if it's well advertised in the sun on Saturday it might pull in a few thousand !leforge wrote:Can't see too many casual subscribing for this such shame !jessi wrote:Just to let people know, live big fight countdown (Mitchell v burns) on b o x n a t i o n 7:30pm tue, wed, thu next week !
Re: Mitchell v Burns undercard?
Still nothing confirmed for undercard yet?? Well no opponents confirmed. Hope they show the Slowey on allegedly. Doubt it but. He's very accurate with his punches, only thing is he doesn't look like he can bang.
-
fightscorecollector
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 473
- Joined: 20 Dec 2011, 12:07
Re: Mitchell v Burns undercard?
john thain is fighting lee noble
-
smoggy7188
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 941
- Joined: 27 Oct 2010, 12:27
Re: Mitchell v Burns undercard?
Harrison/Tony Owen was mentioned the other day. Gethin fight is on wazza's charity card on friday night.
Re: Mitchell v Burns undercard?
Harrison vs Owen was reported in Glasgow's Evening Times and mentioned on ESB forum.
The scottish sun reported today that the opponent for Harrison was TBA
The scottish sun reported today that the opponent for Harrison was TBA
Re: Mitchell v Burns undercard?
I like Lee. Get the suprise result now and again. Would imagine he will be a big bigger than John. Any other news on the undercard
Re: Mitchell v Burns undercard?
According to Mickey Helliet they tried to get the Harrison fight for Tony Owen but it didnt come off so Scott is still fighting the well travelled warrior that is TBA.
Re: Mitchell v Burns undercard?
Tough fight for Thain who likes to trade don't think he'll have the strengh to stand and trade with Noble who's always game, i see a potential upset in this one
-
fightscorecollector
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 473
- Joined: 20 Dec 2011, 12:07
Re: Mitchell v Burns undercard?
only Harrison's opponent has not been named now....
http://boxrec.com/show_display.php?show_id=647389
http://boxrec.com/show_display.php?show_id=647389
-
danconnollyeire
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 3576
- Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31
Re: Mitchell v Burns undercard?
BoxRob vs Billy Nelson?earsjohn wrote:A cracking headline but the support looks particularly dismal.
John Simpson (23-9-0) v Dai Davies (9-18-2) and then 9 House Fighter v TBA's?
Is this simply a case that the headline is that good it doesn't need a worthwhile undercard?
-
ShadrachSimmo
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4733
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42
Re: Mitchell v Burns undercard?
danconnollyeire wrote:BoxRob vs Billy Nelson?earsjohn wrote:A cracking headline but the support looks particularly dismal.
John Simpson (23-9-0) v Dai Davies (9-18-2) and then 9 House Fighter v TBA's?
Is this simply a case that the headline is that good it doesn't need a worthwhile undercard?
-
fightscorecollector
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 473
- Joined: 20 Dec 2011, 12:07
Re: Mitchell v Burns undercard?
Ok Harrisons opponent is this guy
http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer
current WBC Mundo Hispano super bantamweight title champion
this is what ive been told by somebody from another site that quite close to scott
http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer
current WBC Mundo Hispano super bantamweight title champion
this is what ive been told by somebody from another site that quite close to scott
Last edited by fightscorecollector on 21 Sep 2012, 03:45, edited 1 time in total.
-
ShadrachSimmo
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4733
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42
Re: Mitchell v Burns undercard?
That link seems to be wrong.fightscorecollector wrote:Ok Harrisons opponent is this guy
http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?hum...6362&cat=boxer
current WBC Mundo Hispano super bantamweight title champion
this is what ive been told by somebody from another site that quite close to scott
-
Manchester Hitman
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1263
- Joined: 23 Aug 2012, 15:56
Re: Mitchell v Burns undercard?
Allegedly will have to get a couple of the security team gloved up for the undercard at this rate 
-
Bronxbull666
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 384
- Joined: 16 Aug 2012, 17:00
Re: Mitchell v Burns undercard?
John Simpson is a really good boxer and Dai Davies is better than his record suggests, good title fight.
Interesting to see Harrison out again, we can't expect too much too soon.
Bradley Saunders has looked like a good prospect so far.
Loads of prospects, plenty of fights!
It is a good undercard IMO.
Interesting to see Harrison out again, we can't expect too much too soon.
Bradley Saunders has looked like a good prospect so far.
Loads of prospects, plenty of fights!
It is a good undercard IMO.
Re: Mitchell v Burns undercard?
You are far too easily impressed. There is one fight on the bill that is anything other than at least 80:20, and that's the headline. I have no problems with the top fight, but for a World Championship promotion, surely some level of competitivity on the u/c wouldn't go amiss?Bronxbull666 wrote:John Simpson is a really good boxer and Dai Davies is better than his record suggests, good title fight.
Interesting to see Harrison out again, we can't expect too much too soon.
Bradley Saunders has looked like a good prospect so far.
Loads of prospects, plenty of fights!
It is a good undercard IMO.
Re: Mitchell v Burns undercard?
Just a usual Warren card. Couple of fights could be good. Lee Noble is unbeaten in his last 3 fights and will be natrually bigger than Thain. Simpson v Davies will be a goo scrap annol. I can maybe see Lee Quin beating Sammy Hill. Am sure Quinn was a sparring partener for Matthew Hatton and is decent.
Re: Mitchell v Burns undercard?
That undercard looks shocking to me. I will be truly shocked if it's not all home wins.. Maybe get a nice wee coupon