Hatton v Katsidis

ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4738
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Hatton v Katsidis

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

This is the story that's doing the rounds. Not sure if its a done deal yet. Dangerous choice of opponent even if Katsidis is a long way past his best. Thoughts?
Crazyboy
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1246
Joined: 12 Nov 2010, 11:56

Re: Hatton v Katsidis

Post by Crazyboy »

ShadrachSimmo wrote:This is the story that's doing the rounds. Not sure if its a done deal yet. Dangerous choice of opponent even if Katsidis is a long way past his best. Thoughts?
On Twitter, Ricky says announcement Friday, hopefully someone on here will know
Bricks
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3916
Joined: 28 Apr 2008, 12:42

Re: Hatton v Katsidis

Post by Bricks »

Id like to see it
Roars Like Me
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1763
Joined: 14 Feb 2006, 10:43

Re: Hatton v Katsidis

Post by Roars Like Me »

He does have a penchant for being the bigger man in there, he likes the lighter guys to come up to him. With that all aside he does need to have a name and make a bit of an impact so it seems like this fight would do that for him. Katsidis is still quite quick so he still needs to watch out though.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27515
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Hatton v Katsidis

Post by stujones »

You have to say Burns' performances post Katsidis suggest that maybe the Aussie isn't quite a worn as we originally suggested - certainly still has the power.

A Ricky at 70% peak should have too much for Katisidis, but one thing is for certain. Hatton will need to throw many punches and need to be super fit - cause Katsidis will stick to him all night. Just think of how Burns' shots just bounced of Katsidis.
CheckHook
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 780
Joined: 10 Oct 2008, 06:45

Re: Hatton v Katsidis

Post by CheckHook »

Roars Like Me wrote:He does have a penchant for being the bigger man in there, he likes the lighter guys to come up to him. With that all aside he does need to have a name and make a bit of an impact so it seems like this fight would do that for him. Katsidis is still quite quick so he still needs to watch out though.

I agree he usually had a good few lb's on his opponents in the ring, but I can't agree with you when you say "he likes the lighter guys to come up to him". While he was world champion at 140 the only guy you could class as a 'lighter guy' moving up was Castillo, but there was no way he was ever making 135 again anyway. The rest of the time he fought guys that had been at 140 for years and were reining 140lb champions, either that or he was at 147 fighting for titles....
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Hatton v Katsidis

Post by Counter-puncher »

CheckHook wrote:
Roars Like Me wrote:He does have a penchant for being the bigger man in there, he likes the lighter guys to come up to him. With that all aside he does need to have a name and make a bit of an impact so it seems like this fight would do that for him. Katsidis is still quite quick so he still needs to watch out though.

I agree he usually had a good few lb's on his opponents in the ring, but I can't agree with you when you say "he likes the lighter guys to come up to him". While he was world champion at 140 the only guy you could class as a 'lighter guy' moving up was Castillo, but there was no way he was ever making 135 again anyway. The rest of the time he fought guys that had been at 140 for years and were reining 140lb champions, either that or he was at 147 fighting for titles....
he had a lot of gtuys moving up from 130 and 135 in the WBU days.....
Bronxbull666
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 384
Joined: 16 Aug 2012, 17:00

Re: Hatton v Katsidis

Post by Bronxbull666 »

There's no doubt that Katsidis is vulnerable at lightweight, I'd be surprised if he was to fight at Welterweight, he'd be quick, but I think his power is a little bit over-rated. Wouldn't have been an ideal opponent for a Hatton comeback, but a safe(ish) choice. Hatton can back opponents up nicely, this would be the way to dishearten Katsidis. I'd worry about the later rounds, Rick will know what shape he's in, but I'd hope he didn't get too eager early on.

It'd be a good fight, it would be telling anyway.
CheckHook
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 780
Joined: 10 Oct 2008, 06:45

Re: Hatton v Katsidis

Post by CheckHook »

Counter-puncher wrote:
spam wrote:
Roars Like Me wrote:He does have a penchant for being the bigger man in there, he likes the lighter guys to come up to him. With that all aside he does need to have a name and make a bit of an impact so it seems like this fight would do that for him. Katsidis is still quite quick so he still needs to watch out though.

I agree he usually had a good few lb's on his opponents in the ring, but I can't agree with you when you say "he likes the lighter guys to come up to him". While he was world champion at 140 the only guy you could class as a 'lighter guy' moving up was Castillo, but there was no way he was ever making 135 again anyway. The rest of the time he fought guys that had been at 140 for years and were reining 140lb champions, either that or he was at 147 fighting for titles....
he had a lot of gtuys moving up from 130 and 135 in the WBU days.....
Tony Pep and Aldo Rios... and Pep was a 6 foot lightweight. Anyone I missed? :TU:
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Hatton v Katsidis

Post by Counter-puncher »

to be fair checking his record there weren't nearly as many as I thought :TU:
Lenny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3656
Joined: 27 Nov 2003, 05:31

Re: Hatton v Katsidis

Post by Lenny »

CheckHook wrote:Tony Pep and Aldo Rios... and Pep was a 6 foot lightweight. Anyone I missed? :TU:
Pederson is another but can't think of many more

How am I quoting Spam?
Last edited by Lenny on 24 Sep 2012, 11:15, edited 1 time in total.
J
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8015
Joined: 17 Feb 2004, 12:39

Re: Hatton v Katsidis

Post by J »

pederson was late notice for Kelvin pinto pullout so vcan be excused.

thaxton though he was a career lightweight.
Lenny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3656
Joined: 27 Nov 2003, 05:31

Re: Hatton v Katsidis

Post by Lenny »

J wrote:pederson was late notice for Kelvin pinto pullout so vcan be excused.

thaxton though he was a career lightweight.
Witter did offer to step in though when Pinto pulled out
and no, I have no intension of starting this one again, just thought I'd mention it...
J
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8015
Joined: 17 Feb 2004, 12:39

Re: Hatton v Katsidis

Post by J »

HAHAH no worries mate... :salut:
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Hatton v Katsidis

Post by Counter-puncher »

J wrote: thaxton though he was a career lightweight.
weighing in regularly at 140ish before Hatton
Datsue
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hatton v Katsidis

Post by Datsue »

Lenny wrote:Pederson is another but can't think of many more

"Fearless" Freddie Pendleton? No idea if he qualifies, I just like typing "Fearless" Freddie Pendleton.
split_decision
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 255
Joined: 26 Apr 2005, 16:11

Re: Hatton v Katsidis

Post by split_decision »

Katsidis sounds perfect. A typical Hatton opponent. Has seen his best days and considerably lighter.
Lenny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3656
Joined: 27 Nov 2003, 05:31

Re: Hatton v Katsidis

Post by Lenny »

Datsue wrote:
Lenny wrote:Pederson is another but can't think of many more

"Fearless" Freddie Pendleton? No idea if he qualifies, I just like typing "Fearless" Freddie Pendleton.
You love typing it so much you do it when somebody references Dennis Pedersen!!

Although he was never likely to inspire a mega thread...
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Hatton v Katsidis

Post by Final round »

Good choice :TU: , an established international name over here although more dangerous at a lighter weight and has seen better days his entertaining all-action swarming brawler ala Hatton should make for a good scrap while it lasts.
Katsidis last great performance imo was against Marquez and on the downhill ever since but who knows how bad Ricky has slid
Datsue
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hatton v Katsidis

Post by Datsue »

Lenny wrote:
Datsue wrote:
Lenny wrote:Pederson is another but can't think of many more

"Fearless" Freddie Pendleton? No idea if he qualifies, I just like typing "Fearless" Freddie Pendleton.
You love typing it so much you do it when somebody references Dennis Pedersen!!

Although he was never likely to inspire a mega thread...
I know. It's a terrible affliction.

I do think "Fearless" Freddie is worth a mega-thread, meself. I shall see if I can get one going in BOTP, though I fear the sage greybeards therein will look askance at something that's not to do with Harry Greb.
greenyox3
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1197
Joined: 20 Jul 2010, 16:53

Re: Hatton v Katsidis

Post by greenyox3 »

If this fight happens they better have two facial surgeons on standby, with the way both fighters cut up.

Would be fun to watch, no-one can doubt that. Katsidis is strong as an ox at 135, I wonder if he could carry that up the weights.
Manchester Hitman
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1263
Joined: 23 Aug 2012, 15:56

Re: Hatton v Katsidis

Post by Manchester Hitman »

Fcuken hell

Hatton - Katsidis
Quigg - Munroe
Martin Murry, Joe Murray & I heard Richard Towers all on the bill...
This is definatley going to be PPV
SAPFO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2732
Joined: 06 May 2010, 16:48

Re: Hatton v Katsidis

Post by SAPFO »

Lenny wrote:
spam wrote:Tony Pep and Aldo Rios... and Pep was a 6 foot lightweight. Anyone I missed? :TU:
Pederson is another but can't think of many more

How am I quoting Spam?

????
Lenny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3656
Joined: 27 Nov 2003, 05:31

Re: Hatton v Katsidis

Post by Lenny »

Datsue wrote:I know. It's a terrible affliction.

I do think "Fearless" Freddie is worth a mega-thread, meself. I shall see if I can get one going in BOTP, though I fear the sage greybeards therein will look askance at something that's not to do with Harry Greb.
Maybe you could try it in the current scene? But then he would probably be called a bum for not beating Pernall Whitaker? I think here might be the best place for it. Definitely worthy of a mega thread by the way
Last edited by Lenny on 25 Sep 2012, 05:21, edited 1 time in total.
Lenny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3656
Joined: 27 Nov 2003, 05:31

Re: Hatton v Katsidis

Post by Lenny »

carlbcfc wrote:
Lenny wrote:
spam wrote:Tony Pep and Aldo Rios... and Pep was a 6 foot lightweight. Anyone I missed? :TU:
Pederson is another but can't think of many more

How am I quoting Spam?

????
Try quoting CheckHook, it comes up as Spam?
CheckHook wrote:Spam
I can't even write CheckHook!!
Post Reply