Hatton v Katsidis
-
ShadrachSimmo
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4738
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42
Hatton v Katsidis
This is the story that's doing the rounds. Not sure if its a done deal yet. Dangerous choice of opponent even if Katsidis is a long way past his best. Thoughts?
Re: Hatton v Katsidis
On Twitter, Ricky says announcement Friday, hopefully someone on here will knowShadrachSimmo wrote:This is the story that's doing the rounds. Not sure if its a done deal yet. Dangerous choice of opponent even if Katsidis is a long way past his best. Thoughts?
Re: Hatton v Katsidis
Id like to see it
-
Roars Like Me
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1763
- Joined: 14 Feb 2006, 10:43
Re: Hatton v Katsidis
He does have a penchant for being the bigger man in there, he likes the lighter guys to come up to him. With that all aside he does need to have a name and make a bit of an impact so it seems like this fight would do that for him. Katsidis is still quite quick so he still needs to watch out though.
Re: Hatton v Katsidis
You have to say Burns' performances post Katsidis suggest that maybe the Aussie isn't quite a worn as we originally suggested - certainly still has the power.
A Ricky at 70% peak should have too much for Katisidis, but one thing is for certain. Hatton will need to throw many punches and need to be super fit - cause Katsidis will stick to him all night. Just think of how Burns' shots just bounced of Katsidis.
A Ricky at 70% peak should have too much for Katisidis, but one thing is for certain. Hatton will need to throw many punches and need to be super fit - cause Katsidis will stick to him all night. Just think of how Burns' shots just bounced of Katsidis.
Re: Hatton v Katsidis
Roars Like Me wrote:He does have a penchant for being the bigger man in there, he likes the lighter guys to come up to him. With that all aside he does need to have a name and make a bit of an impact so it seems like this fight would do that for him. Katsidis is still quite quick so he still needs to watch out though.
I agree he usually had a good few lb's on his opponents in the ring, but I can't agree with you when you say "he likes the lighter guys to come up to him". While he was world champion at 140 the only guy you could class as a 'lighter guy' moving up was Castillo, but there was no way he was ever making 135 again anyway. The rest of the time he fought guys that had been at 140 for years and were reining 140lb champions, either that or he was at 147 fighting for titles....
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Hatton v Katsidis
he had a lot of gtuys moving up from 130 and 135 in the WBU days.....CheckHook wrote:Roars Like Me wrote:He does have a penchant for being the bigger man in there, he likes the lighter guys to come up to him. With that all aside he does need to have a name and make a bit of an impact so it seems like this fight would do that for him. Katsidis is still quite quick so he still needs to watch out though.
I agree he usually had a good few lb's on his opponents in the ring, but I can't agree with you when you say "he likes the lighter guys to come up to him". While he was world champion at 140 the only guy you could class as a 'lighter guy' moving up was Castillo, but there was no way he was ever making 135 again anyway. The rest of the time he fought guys that had been at 140 for years and were reining 140lb champions, either that or he was at 147 fighting for titles....
-
Bronxbull666
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 384
- Joined: 16 Aug 2012, 17:00
Re: Hatton v Katsidis
There's no doubt that Katsidis is vulnerable at lightweight, I'd be surprised if he was to fight at Welterweight, he'd be quick, but I think his power is a little bit over-rated. Wouldn't have been an ideal opponent for a Hatton comeback, but a safe(ish) choice. Hatton can back opponents up nicely, this would be the way to dishearten Katsidis. I'd worry about the later rounds, Rick will know what shape he's in, but I'd hope he didn't get too eager early on.
It'd be a good fight, it would be telling anyway.
It'd be a good fight, it would be telling anyway.
Re: Hatton v Katsidis
Tony Pep and Aldo Rios... and Pep was a 6 foot lightweight. Anyone I missed?Counter-puncher wrote:he had a lot of gtuys moving up from 130 and 135 in the WBU days.....spam wrote:Roars Like Me wrote:He does have a penchant for being the bigger man in there, he likes the lighter guys to come up to him. With that all aside he does need to have a name and make a bit of an impact so it seems like this fight would do that for him. Katsidis is still quite quick so he still needs to watch out though.
I agree he usually had a good few lb's on his opponents in the ring, but I can't agree with you when you say "he likes the lighter guys to come up to him". While he was world champion at 140 the only guy you could class as a 'lighter guy' moving up was Castillo, but there was no way he was ever making 135 again anyway. The rest of the time he fought guys that had been at 140 for years and were reining 140lb champions, either that or he was at 147 fighting for titles....
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Hatton v Katsidis
to be fair checking his record there weren't nearly as many as I thought 
Re: Hatton v Katsidis
Pederson is another but can't think of many moreCheckHook wrote:Tony Pep and Aldo Rios... and Pep was a 6 foot lightweight. Anyone I missed?
How am I quoting Spam?
Last edited by Lenny on 24 Sep 2012, 11:15, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Hatton v Katsidis
pederson was late notice for Kelvin pinto pullout so vcan be excused.
thaxton though he was a career lightweight.
thaxton though he was a career lightweight.
Re: Hatton v Katsidis
Witter did offer to step in though when Pinto pulled outJ wrote:pederson was late notice for Kelvin pinto pullout so vcan be excused.
thaxton though he was a career lightweight.
and no, I have no intension of starting this one again, just thought I'd mention it...
Re: Hatton v Katsidis
HAHAH no worries mate... 
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Hatton v Katsidis
weighing in regularly at 140ish before HattonJ wrote: thaxton though he was a career lightweight.
-
Datsue
- Heavyweight

Re: Hatton v Katsidis
Lenny wrote:Pederson is another but can't think of many more
"Fearless" Freddie Pendleton? No idea if he qualifies, I just like typing "Fearless" Freddie Pendleton.
-
split_decision
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 255
- Joined: 26 Apr 2005, 16:11
Re: Hatton v Katsidis
Katsidis sounds perfect. A typical Hatton opponent. Has seen his best days and considerably lighter.
Re: Hatton v Katsidis
You love typing it so much you do it when somebody references Dennis Pedersen!!Datsue wrote:Lenny wrote:Pederson is another but can't think of many more
"Fearless" Freddie Pendleton? No idea if he qualifies, I just like typing "Fearless" Freddie Pendleton.
Although he was never likely to inspire a mega thread...
-
Final round
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02
Re: Hatton v Katsidis
Good choice
, an established international name over here although more dangerous at a lighter weight and has seen better days his entertaining all-action swarming brawler ala Hatton should make for a good scrap while it lasts.
Katsidis last great performance imo was against Marquez and on the downhill ever since but who knows how bad Ricky has slid
Katsidis last great performance imo was against Marquez and on the downhill ever since but who knows how bad Ricky has slid
-
Datsue
- Heavyweight

Re: Hatton v Katsidis
I know. It's a terrible affliction.Lenny wrote:You love typing it so much you do it when somebody references Dennis Pedersen!!Datsue wrote:Lenny wrote:Pederson is another but can't think of many more
"Fearless" Freddie Pendleton? No idea if he qualifies, I just like typing "Fearless" Freddie Pendleton.
Although he was never likely to inspire a mega thread...
I do think "Fearless" Freddie is worth a mega-thread, meself. I shall see if I can get one going in BOTP, though I fear the sage greybeards therein will look askance at something that's not to do with Harry Greb.
Re: Hatton v Katsidis
If this fight happens they better have two facial surgeons on standby, with the way both fighters cut up.
Would be fun to watch, no-one can doubt that. Katsidis is strong as an ox at 135, I wonder if he could carry that up the weights.
Would be fun to watch, no-one can doubt that. Katsidis is strong as an ox at 135, I wonder if he could carry that up the weights.
-
Manchester Hitman
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 1263
- Joined: 23 Aug 2012, 15:56
Re: Hatton v Katsidis
Fcuken hell
Hatton - Katsidis
Quigg - Munroe
Martin Murry, Joe Murray & I heard Richard Towers all on the bill...
This is definatley going to be PPV
Hatton - Katsidis
Quigg - Munroe
Martin Murry, Joe Murray & I heard Richard Towers all on the bill...
This is definatley going to be PPV
Re: Hatton v Katsidis
Lenny wrote:Pederson is another but can't think of many morespam wrote:Tony Pep and Aldo Rios... and Pep was a 6 foot lightweight. Anyone I missed?
How am I quoting Spam?
????
Re: Hatton v Katsidis
Maybe you could try it in the current scene? But then he would probably be called a bum for not beating Pernall Whitaker? I think here might be the best place for it. Definitely worthy of a mega thread by the wayDatsue wrote:I know. It's a terrible affliction.
I do think "Fearless" Freddie is worth a mega-thread, meself. I shall see if I can get one going in BOTP, though I fear the sage greybeards therein will look askance at something that's not to do with Harry Greb.
Last edited by Lenny on 25 Sep 2012, 05:21, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Hatton v Katsidis
Try quoting CheckHook, it comes up as Spam?carlbcfc wrote:Lenny wrote:Pederson is another but can't think of many morespam wrote:Tony Pep and Aldo Rios... and Pep was a 6 foot lightweight. Anyone I missed?
How am I quoting Spam?
????
I can't even write CheckHook!!CheckHook wrote:Spam