Sid Razak's License Withdrawn

Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28521
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Sid Razak's License Withdrawn

Post by Coco »

Just seen this on twitter, no reason was given with it, one of a select few of fighters to reach the 100 fight mark.
He can look back at his career with some quiet satisfaction.
bigped
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1572
Joined: 05 Jul 2004, 16:26

Re: Sid Razak's License Withdrawn

Post by bigped »

you keep on withdrawing guys like these licenses be no decent journey men left.
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11810
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Sid Razak's License Withdrawn

Post by Old bones Ian »

Sid punches back less and less nowadays. He's got a good chin but the board is right on this one.
taffytoon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 17 Nov 2009, 18:15

Re: Sid Razak's License Withdrawn

Post by taffytoon »

bigped wrote:you keep on withdrawing guys like these licenses be no decent journey men left.
Not such a bad thing, it may mean we see more prospects matched against each other in 50/50 fights rather than know the result before the fight starts.
Last edited by taffytoon on 27 Oct 2012, 17:48, edited 1 time in total.
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4738
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: Sid Razak's License Withdrawn

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

He's pushing 40 now it's probably not the worst idea in the world. He's been one of if not the toughest journeyman in Britain over the last few years but you can't fight forever.
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: Sid Razak's License Withdrawn

Post by dondada »

He still has his pride but he's too heavy for a start. That Cardle lad really tried to beat the crap out of him and it was uncomfortable to watch. But he stayed the course. Very tough man.
fizzjambo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1283
Joined: 22 Sep 2010, 10:36

Re: Sid Razak's License Withdrawn

Post by fizzjambo »

dondada wrote:He still has his pride but he's too heavy for a start. That Cardle lad really tried to beat the crap out of him and it was uncomfortable to watch. But he stayed the course. Very tough man.
:TU: Bingo (and I don't often agree with you!)
I think weight gain can be a key indicator for a journyman nearing the end. Harder to mess a guy about when he's 5/7 pounds heavier than you are used too, and fit with it. Hard SoaB though! :bag:
The Insider
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 2581
Joined: 26 Mar 2012, 11:21

Re: Sid Razak's License Withdrawn

Post by The Insider »

Withdrawn as his weight was a huge concern to the Board. I believe it's going to an appeal hearing. Sid also got very complacent as of late.
johnnygreaves
Cruiserweight
Posts: 910
Joined: 07 Jan 2011, 07:41

Re: Sid Razak's License Withdrawn

Post by johnnygreaves »

I know this is down to sids weight. He's getting weight off before going to see the board. SIDS had a tough time of late, lost his job & is his fathers full time carer. Sid is a great fella as well as the hardest git I know.Its a lovely thought but prospects won't be matched together.theyll get rid of journeymen like us then bring in east Europeans who fall straight over.the likes of Sid are much needed in today's small hall scene
Champ1982
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 196
Joined: 02 Dec 2011, 06:17

Re: Sid Razak's License Withdrawn

Post by Champ1982 »

Shame. Legend in ma eyes, glad I shared the ring wif this legend :TU:
Jeff Thomas
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3016
Joined: 30 Apr 2009, 06:32

Re: Sid Razak's License Withdrawn

Post by Jeff Thomas »

He's actually got a pretty nice defence
billy nelson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1966
Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49

Re: Sid Razak's License Withdrawn

Post by billy nelson »

Toughest journeyman in the UK and a great lad
tear up
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1832
Joined: 06 Dec 2010, 12:25

Re: Sid Razak's License Withdrawn

Post by tear up »

Takin punches to the head takes its toll out of you in life look at poor Howard Clarke Sid s S great man great for the sport not sayin the board is right but they must of seen somethink in Sid s progress in the ring
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11810
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Sid Razak's License Withdrawn

Post by Old bones Ian »

Nowadays the board withdrawing a licence might just make a boxer follow the unlicenced route. As there seems alot of promotions going that way. And the medical side is alot less strict.
LeedsLad
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 996
Joined: 02 Jul 2010, 06:15

Re: Sid Razak's License Withdrawn

Post by LeedsLad »

billy bessey wrote:Good on the bbbc they should make more of a stance on it. The lad has won 1 out of the last 86 rounds he has competed in this is a professional sport where people should try to win and be able to do so what other PROFESSIONAL sports has serial losers in it like ours?

P.s don't tell me cos his the away fighter he should have won a lot more than he has 1 round won from 86 good on you Bbbc let's see more of it
In theory it's the right idea, but until we stop seeing fat Latvians coming over to take a dive and spend a weekend at the seaside I'd rather they try and maintain the number of and quality of domestic journeymen.

Razak can still handle himself, it's not as if he's getting his head kicked in routintely like Robin Deakin was.
Peter Parker
Super Middleweight
Posts: 86
Joined: 24 Oct 2012, 18:30

Re: Sid Razak's License Withdrawn

Post by Peter Parker »

Bullets For You wrote:
billy bessey wrote:Good on the bbbc they should make more of a stance on it. The lad has won 1 out of the last 86 rounds he has competed in this is a professional sport where people should try to win and be able to do so what other PROFESSIONAL sports has serial losers in it like ours?

P.s don't tell me cos his the away fighter he should have won a lot more than he has 1 round won from 86 good on you Bbbc let's see more of it
With respect Billy if the BBBC should 'make more of a stance' how would you have fared when still boxing? You were clearly a Supermiddle/Lightheavy at the most most yet waddled into the ring as a heavyweight.

If you're advocating quality control about who and who shouldn't be allowed to box, have a look at some of your so called 'white collar' shows, even though the fighters are often as inept as each other usually NEITHER fighter is fit to be in a ring 'white collar' or not.

If Sid wants to continue with his career the board should demand he drops some weight and more importantly veto some of the bouts he takes.
I think it is about age as well as rising in the weights, as you get towards 40 your punch resistance goes down, the board have done it to other fighters, don't think journeymen should fight past 35 in my opinion, they receive a lot of punishment and take fights at short notice against fully fit prospects and contenders.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Sid Razak's License Withdrawn

Post by palooka »

Billy, do yo think Sid has been overmatched or do you think he does not compete at all?
iamasadlittleboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1877
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05

Re: Sid Razak's License Withdrawn

Post by iamasadlittleboy »

billy bessey wrote:Good on the bbbc they should make more of a stance on it. The lad has won 1 out of the last 86 rounds he has competed in this is a professional sport where people should try to win and be able to do so what other PROFESSIONAL sports has serial losers in it like ours?

P.s don't tell me cos his the away fighter he should have won a lot more than he has 1 round won from 86 good on you Bbbc let's see more of it
San Marino?
Adamj1987
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5400
Joined: 14 Oct 2008, 16:16

Re: Sid Razak's License Withdrawn

Post by Adamj1987 »

his fight vs cardle he took a hell of a beating

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7Ctw2xWhm0
el_grande_mauro_mina
Lightweight
Posts: 11215
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54

Re: Sid Razak's License Withdrawn

Post by el_grande_mauro_mina »

bigped wrote:you keep on withdrawing guys like these licenses be no decent journey men left.
And 'prospects' will have to fight each other! Oh no! How terrible! :lol:
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Sid Razak's License Withdrawn

Post by palooka »

That was all was ever going to happen when those 2 were in the ring under lights; the only real surprise is that Sid wasn't bashed and stopped. I agree with a point someone made earlier about people boxing to their level; there are men that Sid could box competitively against, it's better that he does that IMO. I feel I understand the distinctions within boxing with hopers, triers, journeymen, prospects, contenders and titlists. The journeyman band is the broadest with some excellent boxers capable of a real argument, no damage to themselves and the odd upset. The people at the bottom end though sould not be put in with red hot, ex england amateur flying machines.
SAPFO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2732
Joined: 06 May 2010, 16:48

Re: Sid Razak's License Withdrawn

Post by SAPFO »

If only the BBBoC, or their equivalent local branches matched fighters instead of promoters....


Boxing is like WWE. In fact, when watching WWE with my kids today, I never had a clue who was going to win. Most of us can pick 95% of bouts listed on boxrecs schedule.
REEVE
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 776
Joined: 19 Apr 2010, 19:12

Re: Sid Razak's License Withdrawn

Post by REEVE »

just watched the cardle fight the ref should of stopped that fight for sure! no punches coming back at all in the 4th whatsoever
frankgreaves
Cruiserweight
Posts: 142
Joined: 26 Sep 2010, 08:13

Re: Sid Razak's License Withdrawn

Post by frankgreaves »

There are major issues with the way Managers / Promoters match the prospects that they handle, we are all to blame in some way!! If a prospect gets overmatched & beaten the whole team get stick for not doing there job properly, I know this is where a good matchmaker is needed but it is a very difficult thing to get right! I must say tho that, for me, journeymen, good ones, like Sid Razak, Johnny Greaves, Kristian Laight, Jason Nesbitt, Al Hamidi etc etc are great for the game, they provide vital rounds for prospects that need them, sometimes they are overmatched & they have to use every bit of skill, guile, intelligence & ringcraft to get through a fight, yes it's sometimes a hard watch but then so is seeing a good prospect getting beaten through bad matching!! I'd rather see Tommy Coyle vs Sid Razak than against some eastern european fall over merchant any day of the week, as for prospect vs prospect week in week out hahahaha I won't hold my breath!!!
pyenest77
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1491
Joined: 29 Sep 2009, 15:14

Re: Sid Razak's License Withdrawn

Post by pyenest77 »

as for prospect vs prospect week in week out hahahaha I won't hold my breath!!![/quote]

Unfortunately Frank we will never get that & although I know promoters have to build their prospects up, but I have been I have seen cards on here where every boxer in the away column on the schedule page is red (Ie lost the last 6). Then surprisngly most fights finish 60-54 or 40-36. If the shows srent competitive then surely the fans will stop paying there hard earned...
Post Reply