16 Years ago today...

observer1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1836
Joined: 27 Nov 2007, 22:30

Re: 16 Years ago today...

Post by observer1 »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Whatever helps you sleep at night, he was smack dab in the middle of his prime and he lost. I know that's tough to swallow for his fans, it happens to almost every fighter. Sorry kid.
How was he in the middle of his prime Saad?

Sure, physically he was better of Post-Prison.

But can you actually say with a serious face, that he was better Post-Prison than when he was Pre-Prison?

If you actually sit down and watch his fights Pre and Post Prison, you could be convinced it was 2 different fighters.

To Quote...
He was 41-1 before Prison. (Broke all the records)

9(2) - 5 after prison over the course of 10 years.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: 16 Years ago today...

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

observer1 wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Whatever helps you sleep at night, he was smack dab in the middle of his prime and he lost. I know that's tough to swallow for his fans, it happens to almost every fighter. Sorry kid.
How was he in the middle of his prime Saad?

Sure, physically he was better of Post-Prison.

But can you actually say with a serious face, that he was better Post-Prison than when he was Pre-Prison?

If you actually sit down and watch his fights Pre and Post Prison, you could be convinced it was 2 different fighters.

To Quote...
He was 41-1 before Prison. (Broke all the records)

9(2) - 5 after prison over the course of 10 years.
He fought Douglas before he went to prison. Where in the world did you get that I think his prime was after prison? Was it when I said the exact opposite of that right after your post? You're not following along very well.
misterpunch
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1252
Joined: 13 Jan 2012, 17:48

Re: 16 Years ago today...

Post by misterpunch »

prison only slammed in the last nail of his coffin - his head was not in the best place way before douglas knocked it off! women trouble, trainer trouble, media trouble, ego trouble, accountant trouble, promoter trouble, - this guy had to be some kind of god to have kept his form during that whirlwind...and he wasnt
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: 16 Years ago today...

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

misterpunch wrote:prison only slammed in the last nail of his coffin - his head was not in the best place way before douglas knocked it off! women trouble, trainer trouble, media trouble, ego trouble, accountant trouble, promoter trouble, - this guy had to be some kind of god to have kept his form during that whirlwind...and he wasnt
Still complete bullshit.
hhaehre
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6422
Joined: 23 Oct 2008, 07:26

Re: 16 Years ago today...

Post by hhaehre »

Rocky Balboa wrote:
hhaehre wrote:
Rocky Balboa wrote:Holyfield vs Tyson. "FINALLY"

Great performance from Evander. Not to undermine or diminish such a victory, but just how ANYONE felt Tyson would be the fighter he was four years previous, when this fight was originally scheduled, let alone the fighter he was during his peak, is laughable.
Why is that laughable? At the time Holyfield was considered passed it after poor showings in the third Bowe fight and the Czyz fight while Tyson had looked pretty good in his comeback, especially in his destruction of Bruno. The fight was more a case of Evander proving people wrong than Tyson being a shadow of his old self.
It's laughable because the man had been inactive for four years, thereof them spent in a prison cell, meaning during three years he didn't even lace up a pair of gloves, let alone do anything else remotely to do with Boxing. He was never going to be the fighter he was before he went to jail, let alone the one who tore through the division at his peak.
It's not laughable because AT THE TIME it looked like he was back in full force. In hindsight it's easy to say he was in fact diminished but you couldn't say that on the back of the second Bruno fight and going into the Holyfield fight.
misterpunch
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1252
Joined: 13 Jan 2012, 17:48

Re: 16 Years ago today...

Post by misterpunch »

exactly - its hindsight. looking at evidence which might have been obscured by other factors at the time of your original assessment. its not bullshit - in fact its the opposite of bullshit.

however, saad, your entitled to yours
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: 16 Years ago today...

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Hindsight is essential in evaluating anything properly, that doesn't make your thoughts immune from bullshit. That's all you're spouting when you tell me Tyson was well past his prime in Tokyo, pure unadulterated bullshit.
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26376
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: 16 Years ago today...

Post by banjo »

misterpunch wrote:prison only slammed in the last nail of his coffin - his head was not in the best place way before douglas knocked it off! women trouble, trainer trouble, media trouble, ego trouble, accountant trouble, promoter trouble, - this guy had to be some kind of god to have kept his form during that whirlwind...and he wasnt
Buster Douglas lead up was worse though, his mother died 3 weeks before the fight, his sons mother was seriously ill and he caught the flu the day before the fight and still left Tyson crawling around on the canvas. Everyone has issues, some just don't let it affect their professional life.
dan28uk
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 657
Joined: 19 Feb 2012, 13:24

Re: 16 Years ago today...

Post by dan28uk »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Whatever helps you sleep at night, he was smack dab in the middle of his prime and he lost. I know that's tough to swallow for his fans, it happens to almost every fighter. Sorry kid.

your so arrogant y cant u just except someone else's opinion.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: 16 Years ago today...

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

dan28uk wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Whatever helps you sleep at night, he was smack dab in the middle of his prime and he lost. I know that's tough to swallow for his fans, it happens to almost every fighter. Sorry kid.

your so arrogant y cant u just except someone else's opinion.
First off, the arrogant comments were quite mutual. Secondly, why can't you just accept me not accepting his opinion?
dan28uk
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 657
Joined: 19 Feb 2012, 13:24

Re: 16 Years ago today...

Post by dan28uk »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
dan28uk wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Whatever helps you sleep at night, he was smack dab in the middle of his prime and he lost. I know that's tough to swallow for his fans, it happens to almost every fighter. Sorry kid.

your so arrogant y cant u just except someone else's opinion.
First off, the arrogant comments were quite mutual. Secondly, why can't you just accept me not accepting his opinion?


i do, you just come across that way
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: 16 Years ago today...

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

dan28uk wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
dan28uk wrote:

your so arrogant y cant u just except someone else's opinion.
First off, the arrogant comments were quite mutual. Secondly, why can't you just accept me not accepting his opinion?


i do, you just come across that way
That's a shame, isn't my intention. Humor doesn't always translate as well in writing. On the other hand, he couldn't be more wrong so i'll accept some arrogance when refuting the ridiculous.
misterpunch
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1252
Joined: 13 Jan 2012, 17:48

Re: 16 Years ago today...

Post by misterpunch »

can you blame anyone for thinking youre are an arrogant so and so? the truth is its YOU who are unable to accept the opinion of someone else for a very good reason;

1. my argument is a winner

and i'm not a tyson fan - never have been - in fact i firmly believe that allying oneself to a favourite fighter seriously ruins ones judgement..you have proved that
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46488
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: 16 Years ago today...

Post by gilgamesh »

I don't think Mike was past his prime in Tokyo against Douglas, he just trained like he was going in there against a bum that he could blow out in 1 round. When he couldn't, he was f***ed. If he had trained for the Douglas fight, like he was going to be fighting a vicious challenger hell bent on taking his title, it very well may have been a different result, but he didn't and it wasn't. I don't think he would have ever beaten Holyfield though, Tyson was a classic bully and Holy ate up guys with bully mentalities because he wouldn't scared of any fighter. I think he would've always broken Tyson's will over the course of 12 rounds.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: 16 Years ago today...

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

misterpunch wrote:can you blame anyone for thinking youre are an arrogant so and so? the truth is its YOU who are unable to accept the opinion of someone else for a very good reason;

1. my argument is a winner

and i'm not a tyson fan - never have been - in fact i firmly believe that allying oneself to a favourite fighter seriously ruins ones judgement..you have proved that
No, I'm definitely extremely opinionated/arrogant. Can you accept that you're the same? Your argument is flimsy and weak. I never accused you of being a Tyson fan and your assertion that I'm biased is just more confirmation of your own arrogance.
Recycle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 17
Joined: 04 Mar 2012, 00:51

Re: 16 Years ago today...

Post by Recycle »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
misterpunch wrote:can you blame anyone for thinking youre are an arrogant so and so? the truth is its YOU who are unable to accept the opinion of someone else for a very good reason;

1. my argument is a winner

and i'm not a tyson fan - never have been - in fact i firmly believe that allying oneself to a favourite fighter seriously ruins ones judgement..you have proved that
No, I'm definitely extremely opinionated/arrogant. Can you accept that you're the same? Your argument is flimsy and weak. I never accused you of being a Tyson fan and your assertion that I'm biased is just more confirmation of your own arrogance.
Wow saad getting into Internet fights constantly. One hand on the keyboard and the other rubbing Erik morales ballsacks
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: 16 Years ago today...

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Thankfully, I have you rubbing mine.
misterpunch
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1252
Joined: 13 Jan 2012, 17:48

Re: 16 Years ago today...

Post by misterpunch »

does he do this a lot? have i been suckered into this one? - oh well, we live and learn. gilgermesh's argument is opposed to mine but there is (like my own) not a trace of arrogance in it - thats how it should be.

thanks for the warning and i wont get caught again
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: 16 Years ago today...

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

That's certainly your prerogative if you have no wish for an education. I look forward to many years of you not responding to my comments and may you find a comfortable resting place under Mike's scrotum.
Bobbyptsd
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1858
Joined: 24 Apr 2011, 00:58

Re: 16 Years ago today...

Post by Bobbyptsd »

misterpunch wrote:does he do this a lot? have i been suckered into this one? - oh well, we live and learn. gilgermesh's argument is opposed to mine but there is (like my own) not a trace of arrogance in it - thats how it should be.

thanks for the warning and i wont get caught again
He often mistakes arrogance, for some kind of superiority.

He isn't nearly as smart as he'd like to think, and he can't write very well, but he is persistent, I'll give him that. It's sort of like trying to argue with a person with down syndrome who's absolutely convinced he's smarter than you, he won't give up.

That's about the nicest thing I have to say about him.
bollox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2168
Joined: 12 Jan 2003, 07:41

Re: 16 Years ago today...

Post by bollox »

16 years ago ey? :o It doesn't seem like that long ago but that's probably because it was such a monumental moment in boxing (monumental for all the wrong fukking reasons)
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: 16 Years ago today...

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Bobbyptsd wrote:
misterpunch wrote:does he do this a lot? have i been suckered into this one? - oh well, we live and learn. gilgermesh's argument is opposed to mine but there is (like my own) not a trace of arrogance in it - thats how it should be.

thanks for the warning and i wont get caught again
He often mistakes arrogance, for some kind of superiority.

He isn't nearly as smart as he'd like to think, and he can't write very well, but he is persistent, I'll give him that. It's sort of like trying to argue with a person with down syndrome who's absolutely convinced he's smarter than you, he won't give up.

That's about the nicest thing I have to say about him.
I'm intelligent enough to know what ignore means. That puts me way up on you. Then again, you're just a Kung Fu junkie so it's nothing to brag about. Oh yeah, Nebraska is in the United States.
SamWise72
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1346
Joined: 02 Jul 2011, 16:41

Re: 16 Years ago today...

Post by SamWise72 »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:It's amazing how there wasn't one person in the universe that noticed his prime ending before the Douglas fight, as soon as he got his ass whipped it was all she wrote. Finished at 24, what a shame.
This really isn't true. Quite a lot of people were pointing out his reduced head movement, lack of combination punching etc. I thought he was on the slide after Tucker, and I remember reading serious predictions that he would lose to Tubbs.
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9011
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: 16 Years ago today...

Post by Syntax Error »

Rocky Balboa wrote:Holyfield vs Tyson. "FINALLY"

Great performance from Evander. Not to undermine or diminish such a victory, but just how ANYONE felt Tyson would be the fighter he was four years previous, when this fight was originally scheduled, let alone the fighter he was during his peak, is laughable.

Over four years without a fight, three of those years spent in prison - it was impossible for him to be the guy he was in 1991, let alone the guy he was at his best.

Tyson showed proper class & character in this defeat. Mike was never knocked out by shot - it was always the result of severe punishment absorbed. Displayed a great chin on this night. As did Holyfield, who stuck to the game plan.

Had they originally fought in 1991, when Evander was much more susceptible to being drawn into a slugfest, I believe that would have been his undoing. Holyfield was a much more wiser fighter some five years later.
I can't believe that fight was 16 years ago! :o

I can still vividly remember turning to my mates after the 2nd round & saying that Holyfield in going to 'do' Tyson by the 10th.

They all thought I was crazy when I said it, but I could just tell from the way Evander was fighting.

I didn't give him too much of a prayer pre fight, but once the fight was underway, I could just see he had the beating of Tyson.

As for the fight being in 1991, I think the result would have been the same had that come off then.

Tyson had stopped moving his head & throwing combinations even then & Holyfield would have done a similar number on him IMO.
Last edited by Syntax Error on 20 Nov 2012, 12:36, edited 1 time in total.
misterpunch
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1252
Joined: 13 Jan 2012, 17:48

Re: 16 Years ago today...

Post by misterpunch »

like i said.....past his peak
Post Reply