So that gives him the right to be a c0ck?Coco wrote:The reason Eric is in a position to name drop is because he knows well and is genuinely friendly with pretty much everyone in the game.sweetscience wrote:everytime you post you name drop in some way or otherERIC GUY wrote:PM me your phone numbers, and I will get them to call you, then you can explain to them personally.
you seriously need to get over yourself.... your just a cameraman for fucks sake
To Paul Thomas and Mickey Vann
-
danconnollyeire
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 3576
- Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31
Re: To Paul Thomas and Mickey Vann
Re: To Paul Thomas and Mickey Vann
Eric isn't a cockdanconnollyeire wrote:
So that gives him the right to be a c0ck?
-
sweetscience
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2816
- Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09
Re: To Paul Thomas and Mickey Vann
im sure he is a lovely guy & good for the sport
however... his name dropping is excessive !
however... his name dropping is excessive !
Re: To Paul Thomas and Mickey Vann
As boxing fans we regularly talk about people in the game, Eric is in a position to give personal insights, people on the forum have accused him of bs before, I see it more as jealousy, he doesn't say stuff unless he has been there and done it.sweetscience wrote:im sure he is a lovely guy & good for the sport
however... his name dropping is excessive !
-
Yes We Can
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 2087
- Joined: 29 Sep 2010, 17:16
Re: To Paul Thomas and Mickey Vann
I haven't seen the fight , so cant comment on that aspect.
People have the chance to here a reasoned explanation from the officials (if Eric is to be believed they will actually call) , how the hell can anybody criticising not take the oppurtunity with both hands to actually have a reasoned conversation with those involved?
give your phone number to the guy, and see what they have to say. Don't jump down his throat for such an off the cuff comment.
People have the chance to here a reasoned explanation from the officials (if Eric is to be believed they will actually call) , how the hell can anybody criticising not take the oppurtunity with both hands to actually have a reasoned conversation with those involved?
give your phone number to the guy, and see what they have to say. Don't jump down his throat for such an off the cuff comment.
-
Datsue
- Heavyweight

Re: To Paul Thomas and Mickey Vann
I think getting personal because someone dared question his mate is, if not cock-like, at least close enough to cock that it can be seen on a clear day. Particularly when... Well.Coco wrote:Eric isn't a cockdanconnollyeire wrote:
So that gives him the right to be a c0ck?
Alexander Dimitrenko 253½ lbs lost to Eddie Chambers 208¼ lbs by MD in round 12 of 12
Location: Color Line Arena, Altona, Hamburg, Germany
Referee: Genaro Rodriguez
Judge: Glenn Feldman 109-117
Judge: Fernando Laguna 111-116
Judge: Paul Thomas 113-113
-
Datsue
- Heavyweight

Re: To Paul Thomas and Mickey Vann
funtime wrote:I haven't seen the fight , so cant comment on that aspect.
People have the chance to here a reasoned explanation from the officials (if Eric is to be believed they will actually call) , how the hell can anybody criticising not take the oppurtunity with both hands to actually have a reasoned conversation with those involved?
give your phone number to the guy, and see what they have to say. Don't jump down his throat for such an off the cuff comment.
I don't know the fella so can't say, but did that sound like he was going to have a reasoned conversation? Or did it sound like a closing-the-doors old-boy's-network don't-ever-question-one-of-our-own bully-boy bullshit how-dare-you threat?
I have my own opinion, obviously, but I'd like to see how that comment could be construed as anything else.
& if he really meant "Give me your phone number so he can have a reasonable conversation" then I apologise but fvck me I'm having trouble seeing that from the tone of the post, mate.
Re: To Paul Thomas and Mickey Vann
Datsue wrote:funtime wrote:I haven't seen the fight , so cant comment on that aspect.
People have the chance to here a reasoned explanation from the officials (if Eric is to be believed they will actually call) , how the hell can anybody criticising not take the oppurtunity with both hands to actually have a reasoned conversation with those involved?
give your phone number to the guy, and see what they have to say. Don't jump down his throat for such an off the cuff comment.
I don't know the fella so can't say, but did that sound like he was going to have a reasoned conversation? Or did it sound like a closing-the-doors old-boy's-network don't-ever-question-one-of-our-own bully-boy bullshit how-dare-you threat?
I have my own opinion, obviously, but I'd like to see how that comment could be construed as anything else.
PM me your phone numbers, and I will get them to call you, then THEY can explain to them TO YOU
As people where questioning the judging. Unless they needed a phone call to explain the question? Which wasn't that hard to understand. Especially when compared to the judging
-
el_grande_mauro_mina
- Lightweight
- Posts: 11215
- Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54
Re: To Paul Thomas and Mickey Vann
What would be better is if Eric could get Paul Thomas to come on here and explain his scoring on various fights he has judged and reffed but the thread would 168 pages long and the bandwith of boxrec would fornicating explode. Paul Thomas is the main offender by a long long chalk.
Re: To Paul Thomas and Mickey Vann
The original post was very bullish, using terms like inept, corrupt, joke etc.
Whether you agree with his opinion or not you can hardly be surprised if equally bullish responses are made.
Whether you agree with his opinion or not you can hardly be surprised if equally bullish responses are made.
-
Datsue
- Heavyweight

Re: To Paul Thomas and Mickey Vann
What would you call it then mate?Coco wrote:The original post was very bullish, using terms like inept, corrupt, joke etc.
Whether you agree with his opinion or not you can hardly be surprised if equally bullish responses are made.
A slight conflict of interest? A prolonged series of questionable results? A Series of Unfortunate Events? A catalogue of teensy-tiny-ickle oversights? Is that better?
I fvcking love boxing.
I love the people involved. How can you not?
But fvck me everyone I've ever spoken to (& twenty years of going to fights, it's one or two) acknowledges that some cancerous shit goes on, & then out the other side of their mouths they dig the shithole a little deeper, because they've all got one eye on their pocket.
Listen to A Certain Someone reminisce if you want a shining example. "Old Kent Road... Closed down pub... 'E 'ad to retire, detached brain stem... Shame people get exploited... Closed down pub... Shady reference... Closed down pub... I'm gonna get a job as a promoter's boy...".
The problem with boxing is... Boxing people. & the bullshit "it's how it's done" mentality. & it's fvcking retarded that you can't speak honestly because of "the way things are done". I know people like it that way, but fvck me I'll be glad in twenty-five years, if I'm still alive, because hopefully the next wave will be as repulsed by all this cloak & dagger fvcking pull-the-wagons-round-in-a-circle bullshit as I am.
Last edited by Datsue on 28 Nov 2012, 12:27, edited 1 time in total.
Re: To Paul Thomas and Mickey Vann
I've just had an irate Paul Thomas on the phone. He's requested that we all ring Eric Guy instead.
Eric, what's your number please?
Eric, what's your number please?
-
Datsue
- Heavyweight

Re: To Paul Thomas and Mickey Vann
Ben Carey wrote:I've just had an irate Paul Thomas on the phone. He's requested that we all ring Eric Guy instead.
Eric, what's your number please?
-
misterpunch
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 1252
- Joined: 13 Jan 2012, 17:48
Re: To Paul Thomas and Mickey Vann
cracking post - datsue 
-
thepocketrocket
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3283
- Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26
Re: To Paul Thomas and Mickey Vann
Ben Carey wrote:I've just had an irate Paul Thomas on the phone. He's requested that we all ring Eric Guy instead.
Eric, what's your number please?
Re: To Paul Thomas and Mickey Vann
Teddys Toupee may have a story to tell about Mr Vann and his impartiallity, as a ref and not a judge though.
-
Datsue
- Heavyweight

Re: To Paul Thomas and Mickey Vann
How dare you?!?!?!?palooka wrote:Teddys Toupee may have a story to tell about Mr Vann and his impartiallity, as a ref and not a judge though.
What's your phone number?
Et cetera...
Re: To Paul Thomas and Mickey Vann
Jealousy is a terrible thing
-
Datsue
- Heavyweight

Re: To Paul Thomas and Mickey Vann
Choon!@matt___s wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHrECHho14U
-
Datsue
- Heavyweight

Re: To Paul Thomas and Mickey Vann
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!Coco wrote:Jealousy is a terrible thing
That's brilliant. Thank you for that. Are you here all week?
In other news, I'm actually most upset that no-one got my Lemony Snicket reference. I worked that in quite well, I thought...
Re: To Paul Thomas and Mickey Vann
It is Coco but I'm not sure who's showing that they're jealous or envious of anyone here.Coco wrote:Jealousy is a terrible thing
Re: To Paul Thomas and Mickey Vann
I'd need it pointed out to me I think, was that the film Jim Carrey was in?Datsue wrote:Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!Coco wrote:Jealousy is a terrible thing
That's brilliant. Thank you for that. Are you here all week?
In other news, I'm actually most upset that no-one got my Lemony Snicket reference. I worked that in quite well, I thought...
I made a cracking Venn diagram joke in Off Topic the other day - fcuk all. Nothing.
-
Datsue
- Heavyweight

Re: To Paul Thomas and Mickey Vann
Though I've admitted I'm quite bitter that no-one got my Lemony Snicket reference.palooka wrote:It is Coco but I'm not sure who's showing that they're jealous or envious of anyone here.Coco wrote:Jealousy is a terrible thing
-
Datsue
- Heavyweight

Re: To Paul Thomas and Mickey Vann
Fuckin' bunch of savages.@matt___s wrote:I'd need it pointed out to me I think, was that the film Jim Carrey was in?Datsue wrote:Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!Coco wrote:Jealousy is a terrible thing
That's brilliant. Thank you for that. Are you here all week?
In other news, I'm actually most upset that no-one got my Lemony Snicket reference. I worked that in quite well, I thought...
I made a cracking Venn diagram joke in Off Topic the other day - fcuk all. Nothing.

Last edited by Datsue on 28 Nov 2012, 14:13, edited 1 time in total.