Urgent! correct Chauncy's record

Post Reply
nztyrant
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 36
Joined: 20 Sep 2004, 04:35

Urgent! correct Chauncy's record

Post by nztyrant »

Regarding Chauncy Wellivers result against Elisara SiUta (05-03-05)
The final outcome is officially a NO CONTEST
I have seen the paperwork, and it was confirmed personaly by the President Mr Gary McCrystal of the N.Z.N.B.F (New Zealand National Boxing Federation)
I've been told that only the editor who locks in a result is the one able to access it and change it?
If that is the case and it cannot be changed then I think someone who knows or is able to contact ANTON SEVESK might like to let him know whats happened.
He is welcome to call Mr McCrystal for verification of this final change.

I would appreciate any help with getting this corrected as soon as possible, it is important, and it is the WRONG result at present

Thanks for your consideration

John Glozier
delisa
Editor
Editor
Posts: 1466
Joined: 29 Dec 2001, 20:00

Post by delisa »

I have email and reports from McCrystal confirming the NC result.
One editor (Anton) has a conspiracy theory regarding this and claims the reports from NZ re a NC were forgery, yet no proof of this has surfaced.

Based on my investigation and documents received I have changed it back to a NC.
AntonS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6406
Joined: 16 Sep 2003, 04:38

Post by AntonS »

I have contacted Gary McCrystal again and he had explained the situation and the reason for it.
However, he still maintains the letter which was supposedly by him was a fake.
I’m glad this has finally come to a conclusion and looking forward to their re-match.

Regards to all
Anton
delisa
Editor
Editor
Posts: 1466
Joined: 29 Dec 2001, 20:00

Post by delisa »

Why no letter from McCrystal? Why no documentation other than what I ahve recived? Why no emails from the fighters ionvolved, other than my corresp. with Welliver.

Other than your hearsay, the record stands as a NC.

Get some proof, please.

I have no personal stake in this, Anton, but why should I believe you rather than a signed, notarized document?
AntonS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6406
Joined: 16 Sep 2003, 04:38

Post by AntonS »

delisa
As I said, Gary has explained to me why the result has now been changed to NC.
End of story
John
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9072
Joined: 08 May 2000, 20:00

Post by John »

Here we go again :roll: I´m at the WBC convention and I have managed to speak with Douglas Belton who is the current president of the NZ boxing federation and also this years president of the commonwealth boxing council. He said Welliver lost on points, that he was at the fight and saw it with his own eyes. He added that McCrystal is an amateur boxing official and a bit of a bullshitter.
AntonS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6406
Joined: 16 Sep 2003, 04:38

Post by AntonS »

McCrystal claimed likewise until I called him again on Sunday Oct 2.
His explanation was that judge Reddaway had now submitted a letter to NZNBF (in an affidavit form) admitting he had stuffed up. Therefore, they had no alternative but to rule it a No Contest.
He said that if this letter was not submitted by Reddaway the result would stand i.e. Split Points Win to Sii Uta.
IMHO not a satisfactory conclusion, but that’s NZNBF’s problem. Stuff ups like this are not easily forgotten.
Post Reply