Groves v Johnson
-
iamasadlittleboy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1877
- Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05
Re: Groves v Johnson
...wheres a British stoppage when you have money on one?
-
The Insider
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 2581
- Joined: 26 Mar 2012, 11:21
Re: Groves v Johnson
Groves is wide open and starting to look tired now.
Re: Groves v Johnson
Tired as Groves is, he's showing some great stuff in there. I wish he would stop fornicating around with his hands down.
Re: Groves v Johnson
Shut up, Rawling.
Last edited by Horse on 15 Dec 2012, 19:28, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Groves v Johnson
Thought there might be a chance Johnson could 'old man' Groves out of it but turns out Johnson is just an old man.
Re: Groves v Johnson
Johnson starting to land some clean right hands in Round 10
-
Hagler2002
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3512
- Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04
Re: Groves v Johnson
What time is the main event on?
Re: Groves v Johnson
Why can't these commentators shut up!
-
Galvanised Clout
- Heavyweight

Re: Groves v Johnson
Indeed.steve689 wrote:Thought there might be a chance Johnson could 'old man' Groves out of it but turns out Johnson is just an old man.
Re: Groves v Johnson
This is just a young man fighting a very very old tired man. Did Groves learn anything from this fight?
Re: Groves v Johnson
It's ridiculous, isn't it? The best commentators don't have to be on constant send. It's TV not radio.mcato wrote:Why can't these commentators shut up!
-
The Insider
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 2581
- Joined: 26 Mar 2012, 11:21
Re: Groves v Johnson
He learnt Froch would end him and Degale would probably beat him.mcato wrote:This is just a young man fighting a very very old tired man. Did Groves learn anything from this fight?
Re: Groves v Johnson
Johnson down end of round 12, doesn't look too hurt.
-
Galvanised Clout
- Heavyweight

Re: Groves v Johnson
Really sad to be proved right, wasn't good.Galvanised Clout wrote:Johnson looked a bit tired against Fonfara and after a competitive couple of rounds he took a fairly sustained beating for the rest of the fight.
Johnson is still very durable and apart from the Smith fight Groves has rarely showed one punch stoppage power, have a feeling poor old Johnson will take another full distance pasting.
Re: Groves v Johnson
Groves hasn't improved at all! Infact his gone backwardThe Insider wrote:He learnt Froch would end him and Degale would probably beat him.mcato wrote:This is just a young man fighting a very very old tired man. Did Groves learn anything from this fight?
Re: Groves v Johnson
11-1 Groves.
Wasn't a legit knockdown, but doesn't really matter.
Wasn't a legit knockdown, but doesn't really matter.
-
danconnollyeire
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 3576
- Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31
Re: Groves v Johnson
Why are the commentators being so negative? Calling him an embarrassment and being baffled why he's not throwing enough. I believe it's called being 43 years old!
-
MightyWarrior
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13356
- Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01
Re: Groves v Johnson
I thought I was hearing things when he said that....what a plonkerGalvanised Clout wrote:"Imagination with discipline"
Groves was as good as you can expect him to be, work man like performance - no one knocks out ol Johnson, but he did the right thing by testing that chin. A good win though, it's going to be fun following George Groves next year.
-
Final round
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02
Re: Groves v Johnson
Eh?The Insider wrote:He learnt Froch would end him and Degale would probably beat him.mcato wrote:This is just a young man fighting a very very old tired man. Did Groves learn anything from this fight?
Re: Groves v Johnson
Let's give George some credit, he fought reasonably well.
We all know Johnson's legendary 70-90 punches a round was not going to happen tonight (I dont think he threw more than 30-40 a round).
I thought Groves might have over-exerted himself a little and as a result he lost his shape a lot, that bigger younger punchers would have exploited..
..but otherwise he did well after a long spell out of action.
We all know Johnson's legendary 70-90 punches a round was not going to happen tonight (I dont think he threw more than 30-40 a round).
I thought Groves might have over-exerted himself a little and as a result he lost his shape a lot, that bigger younger punchers would have exploited..
..but otherwise he did well after a long spell out of action.
Re: Groves v Johnson
Excellent performance by Groves. Glad he never got caught flush with too many (even though Johnson never threw that many).
For me, Groves was able to hurt Johnson more than Froch did. Although that may be due to the fact that Johnson has aged ring-wise quite a bit since then.
For me, Groves was able to hurt Johnson more than Froch did. Although that may be due to the fact that Johnson has aged ring-wise quite a bit since then.
-
Final round
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02
Re: Groves v Johnson
Well done to Groves , he kept his focus and kept firing at aJohnson who only seemed focused on keeping his granite chinned rep alive rather than actually winning.
-
The Insider
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 2581
- Joined: 26 Mar 2012, 11:21
Re: Groves v Johnson
Wasnt impressed by Groves. He may as well hit the heavy bag for 12 rounds. He looked open and tired IMO.Final round wrote:Eh?The Insider wrote:He learnt Froch would end him and Degale would probably beat him.mcato wrote:This is just a young man fighting a very very old tired man. Did Groves learn anything from this fight?
-
MightyWarrior
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13356
- Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01
Re: Groves v Johnson
I wouldn't put Groves in with Abraham though - AA still looks too crafty and hard hitting, pretty sure he'd flatten George - assuming he wins tonight, and it looks like he will.
Not sure what the other options are at 160, but Booth should avoid AA for a bit I reckon.
Not sure what the other options are at 160, but Booth should avoid AA for a bit I reckon.