Ingle and the Bomber

Pugilist-specialist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1632
Joined: 11 Jul 2008, 04:37

Re: Ingle and the Bomber

Post by Pugilist-specialist »

palooka wrote:You mean amateurs? Do they not pay gym dues? If they did then the Ingles weren't out of pocket and get good press; if they don't then the professionals, (journeymen and champions) paid their way. I've no axe to grind - the Ingles have done some great stuff and helped a lot of people - they have not done it out of their charitable hearts though - it has benefited them as well and there are not many of the boxers done as well out of it.
No axe to grind? You've started threads criticising them. When tear-up posted something about them that was removed you were telling him what a legend he was for it. You've claimed on this thread that Brendan owns 40 or 50 houses which is a blatant lie.
You claim that a few boxers have left over money issues and that is a matter of record. Share your knowledge with us and provide some links. As all the professionals have to sign contracts how many took these issues to the Board? How many took legal action ? If the boxers weren't happy with the terms of their contracts they wouldn't sign them.
Do you think that the people who train there shouldn't pay for the heating, lights and rates?
Why don't you remove your tongue from your mate's backside and go to the gym and see how packed it is and how happy the kids and the pro's are?
You're trying to cast aspersions against a man who has helped hundreds if not thousands of people.

:shame:
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Ingle and the Bomber

Post by palooka »

Do you mean the thread about Dom Ingles corner performance in the Brook v Jones bout? I can appreciate that you admire the set up and hope you understand that the corner that night was not well organised and was worthy of questions been raised. The Tear Up post was something that made me laugh; it wasn't directed at either Brendan or John and although you like the man not everyone has had the same friendly experience as you and they are allowed to put their view across. The gym dues thing was a response to Rhino; not everything I post is directly to you though this is; the boxers that train there do pay for the running of the place and that is right and proper; don't try to make out that the Ingles do it out of the goodness of their hearts; it is a way to make a good living. The 40 - 50 houses thing is something that I heard from someone able to know; if it's wrong I apologise. Though I understand that Brendan Ingle and the gym has done some fantastic work in a deprived area - my contention that there are no 'saints and sinners' in boxing (life) stands. As for me taking my tongue out of someones arse you'd be better taking your own advice.
TJ77
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1352
Joined: 19 Sep 2010, 13:01

Re: Ingle and the Bomber

Post by TJ77 »

Parson Cross wrote:TJ,
You need to have a word with him.
You more than anyone can testify the North is better than the Sarf ! :TU:
He probably enjoys a quieter life daan Sarf Parson like he'd listen to me anyway. :TU:

I watched a video of Emanuel Augustus Herol clearly had influence across the pond too via Naz by the look of the shorts.
It may have its flaws that style but its fun to watch and its a lasting legacy Herol and the ingles and Sheffield can be proud of.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvkRpykP6mQ
Post Reply