Holyfield was more stable than Mike but at that time Tyson STILL PHYSICALLY was too much for Evander. Tyson still had that timing, snap
in his punches, and had his killer instinct and at some point during this fight had it taken place he would have had Evander hurt BADLY. To this
very day I still think Mike Tyson still had the physical advantage over Holyfield 86-91' version of Tyson. Let's be real about this...Holyfield
fought a Mike Tyson that was inactive for FOUR YEARS...One year layoff in boxing isn't good but FOUR YEARS? Come on now! Till this DAY
I do not believe that Holyfield fought the REAL Tyson that was active and fighting regularly. I wanted to see him in there with that 86-91'
version of Tyson so so so bad.....Damn.......Tell me of ANY sport where an athlete could take a 4 year layoff and then come back to
dominate like they did prior to the layoff. That's like Joe Calzaghe stepping out of retirement in 2015 to challenge Carl Froch who has been
active all the time
That's like Oscar coming out of retirement to challenge Alvarez, Mayweather, or Martinez.
Calzaghe last fought in 2008, nitwit. Learn basic math. HINT: 2008-2015 isn't a four-year layoff.
That's like praising someone for being the thinnest patient on a fat farm.