Mark Prince Licence

Post Reply
Darcy Delaney
Cruiserweight
Posts: 634
Joined: 19 Mar 2011, 07:56

Mark Prince Licence

Post by Darcy Delaney »

I've just see on Mark's facebook page that he's been refused his licence from the British Boxing Board of Control ? all it say's is it aint finished yet' what's your thoughts on Mark getting his licence back ?
fizzjambo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1283
Joined: 22 Sep 2010, 10:36

Re: Mark Prince Licence

Post by fizzjambo »

Huge amount of sympathy for what he (Mark Prince) is trying to achieve but in my humble it shouldn't be in a boxing ring.

Lillis hinted at this the other night on allegedly. He didn't mention names but I thought of Mark Prince straight away, he basically said he'd recently seen a come backing British boxer in the gym and had serious concerns over him coming back.

The Board over here generally do a good job on this issue, you've got to take emotion out of it and I hope (and believe) they have.
JamesH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1897
Joined: 08 Aug 2008, 09:16

Re: Mark Prince Licence

Post by JamesH »

The right decision, no doubt. He is an incredible man, best of luck to Mark in everything he does, except getting a licence.
hurlock
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5687
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 04:23

Re: Mark Prince Licence

Post by hurlock »

Can I ask why there is so much discontent with prince making a return???
The man lives well & never had a punishing career so what's up with him doing a 4 or 6 rd job??
He would turn over most of the domestic cruisers IMO
spudder56
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1568
Joined: 16 Jun 2011, 11:27

Re: Mark Prince Licence

Post by spudder56 »

JamesH wrote:The right decision, no doubt. He is an incredible man, best of luck to Mark in everything he does, except getting a licence.

X 2 Mark is nearly 44 and been out of the ring since 1999 why would he want to come back ? But as you say best of luck in life to him
polecateddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Mark Prince Licence

Post by polecateddy »

Stick him in with Danny Williams, Dominic Negus and Mark Potter. Probably beat the lot!
spudder56
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1568
Joined: 16 Jun 2011, 11:27

Re: Mark Prince Licence

Post by spudder56 »

polecateddy wrote:Stick him in with Danny Williams, Dominic Negus and Mark Potter. Probably beat the lot!



I agree the unlicensed circuit would welcome Mark with open arms
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28528
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Mark Prince Licence

Post by Coco »

I doubt there would be a problem if he was only going to fight in 4 rounders against journeymen, but I guess he wants to come back and have once last tilt at title class. Getting in a 12 rounder against a young hungry fighter is a different thing. If he did get hurt in that sort of fight the board would find it hard to justify it.
spudder56
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1568
Joined: 16 Jun 2011, 11:27

Re: Mark Prince Licence

Post by spudder56 »

Coco wrote:I doubt there would be a problem if he was only going to fight in 4 rounders against journeymen, but I guess he wants to come back and have once last tilt at title class. Getting in a 12 rounder against a young hungry fighter is a different thing. If he did get hurt in that sort of fight the board would find it hard to justify it.



x2
Superheavy
Cruiserweight
Posts: 333
Joined: 20 Feb 2011, 07:24

Re: Mark Prince Licence

Post by Superheavy »

Let the guy box
Parson Cross
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1991
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57

Re: Mark Prince Licence

Post by Parson Cross »

Notice no one's said why he wasn't granted a licence.
Before everyone slaughters the Board should we not establish that ?
What if there is a medical issue ?
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27516
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Mark Prince Licence

Post by stujones »

Agree Parson's Cross - likewise though, if it is just concerns over his age (and not based on a medical report or also on concerns about how he is performing in the gym) then the BBBoC warrant criticism.

But as you state, we don't know the facts so shouldn't judge.

Michael Holden and Terry Dunstan were both recently granted a licence and are a similar age and had a similar period out. Dunstan was fairly sucessful on his return, should have got a British title shot - but took some wrong options.
JamesH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1897
Joined: 08 Aug 2008, 09:16

Re: Mark Prince Licence

Post by JamesH »

MachoMan09 wrote:
hurlock wrote:Can I ask why there is so much discontent with prince making a return???
The man lives well & never had a punishing career so what's up with him doing a 4 or 6 rd job??
He would turn over most of the domestic cruisers IMO
Some people like to position themselves as moral guardians, some people like stomping on ambition.
Some people are judgemental of those with a different view to their own, some people are wrong.
magnus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1178
Joined: 13 Dec 2004, 08:59

Re: Mark Prince Licence

Post by magnus »

Parson Cross wrote:Notice no one's said why he wasn't granted a licence.
Before everyone slaughters the Board should we not establish that ?
What if there is a medical issue ?
This is an internet forum, we'll have no carefully considered responses based on all the facts here.
JamesH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1897
Joined: 08 Aug 2008, 09:16

Re: Mark Prince Licence

Post by JamesH »

MachoMan09 wrote:
JamesH wrote:
MachoMan09 wrote: Some people like to position themselves as moral guardians, some people like stomping on ambition.
Some people are judgemental of those with a different view to their own, some people are wrong.
If Mark wants to box, there is absolutely no reason that you could put forward that would make me say he shouldn't be able to do so.
I don't recall mentioning anything about wanting to make you say anything. If anything, I prefer the bouts of silence.

I respect and like Mark, but there is more to this than whether he has had ring wars. It's not about morals. If I were some kind of moralistic crusader, I wouldn't be nuts deep into one of, if not the most corrupt sports on the planet. I just have a view, like you do, and mine is that he should not be fighting now. I don't mind that not everyone shares that view, in fact healthy disagreement forms the basis of many of the best threads. So you please say, or don't say, anything you like :TU:
Post Reply