Gay boxers.

kevo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6559
Joined: 30 Apr 2003, 14:30

Re: Gay boxers.

Post by kevo »

Datsue wrote:
big lennox wrote:The whole thing is a non-issue to my mind. I like people. If you go for a pint with somone, it's because you enjoy their company not because of who they are sleeping with/or fancy.

If someone is gay, they haven't messed up, there is nothing wrong with them. To that person, fancying a man or a woman, is the most natural thing in the world, in the same way some people fancy confident people, whilst others are very taken with quieter personailities.Equally, some people love being in a dramatic relationship and some people don't. Everyone has their own variations on the theme of love/fancying people.

I just don't understand how someone not fancying the same person or gender as you makes them less than equal. That school of thought is a nonsense.

:TU:

After all, if we were to discriminate based upon our reactions to peoples' choice of bed-partners, Kevo would be the most unpopular man on Earth. But thankfully it's not so...
:lol:

Heyyyy..........
SamWise72
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1346
Joined: 02 Jul 2011, 16:41

Re: Gay boxers.

Post by SamWise72 »

JLP wrote:
The Dark Destroyer wrote:I always wonder about the people who proclaim to hate it and how much it repulses them, there must be a reason why. Deep seated homosexual tendencies probably.
I'm not sure. I agree there must be a reason why some people are repulsed (genuinely repulsed i.e. not affected repulsion which is a very different issue) by homosexuality but I question whether that reason is typically a deep seated homosexual tendency. It is something that is commonly proposed but I've always got the impression it's not based on any type of fact or concerted study. If a repulsion brought on by the sight or thought of homosexual acts was caused by a deep seated tendency towards homosexuality, it would figure that those repulsed by, for example: child abuse, murder, rape, Marmite, etc... must have deep seated tendencies towards those things. This may or may not be the case.
I don't buy this either. I think SOME people cover up for latent homosexual feelings by acting out really strongly against it. For me, I feel repulsed by the idea of sex with a man, and I don't like seeing or imagining it. I think this is because I'm only attracted to women; I believe there are men on the far gay end of the spectrum who find the idea of heterosexual sex repulsive; it makes sense to me. I think straight men aren't repulsed by lesbian acts because they can be attracted to both the participants.

None of this means I hate gay people, or want to stop them doing what they want to do. I simply choose not to watch gay sex or think very often about it. Simples! I also wouldn't have felt the need to say that it repulses me, had we stuck to just talking about gay boxers, only because this topic came up. My opinion of or feelings about other people's sexual practises are irrelevant, as long as those acts don't harm anyone.
vagabundo55
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Gay boxers.

Post by vagabundo55 »

About 90% of "elite" boxers, much like the newscasters and hollywood "stars"..
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5512
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: Gay boxers.

Post by forcefraser »

SamWise72 wrote:
JLP wrote:
The Dark Destroyer wrote:I always wonder about the people who proclaim to hate it and how much it repulses them, there must be a reason why. Deep seated homosexual tendencies probably.
I'm not sure. I agree there must be a reason why some people are repulsed (genuinely repulsed i.e. not affected repulsion which is a very different issue) by homosexuality but I question whether that reason is typically a deep seated homosexual tendency. It is something that is commonly proposed but I've always got the impression it's not based on any type of fact or concerted study. If a repulsion brought on by the sight or thought of homosexual acts was caused by a deep seated tendency towards homosexuality, it would figure that those repulsed by, for example: child abuse, murder, rape, Marmite, etc... must have deep seated tendencies towards those things. This may or may not be the case.
I don't buy this either. I think SOME people cover up for latent homosexual feelings by acting out really strongly against it. For me, I feel repulsed by the idea of sex with a man, and I don't like seeing or imagining it. I think this is because I'm only attracted to women; I believe there are men on the far gay end of the spectrum who find the idea of heterosexual sex repulsive; it makes sense to me. I think straight men aren't repulsed by lesbian acts because they can be attracted to both the participants.

None of this means I hate gay people, or want to stop them doing what they want to do. I simply choose not to watch gay sex or think very often about it. Simples! I also wouldn't have felt the need to say that it repulses me, had we stuck to just talking about gay boxers, only because this topic came up. My opinion of or feelings about other people's sexual practises are irrelevant, as long as those acts don't harm anyone.
I`ve never understood that train of thought either. If someone who is replused by the thought of male arse badgering is really a closet homosexual, then how could he be repulsed by something he is actually attracted to? Unless the person is lying about being replused, it makes no sense at all.

It might be unfashionable or politically incorrect to openly admit to finding homosexuality disgusting, but I don`t care. There is nothing about another mans rasshul that I find even remotely attractive. A bloke is generally a hairy stinking animal, wheras a tasty bird is a thing of beauty.

I have to admit to having no female friends and I don`t believe a purely platonic relatiionship can exist between a straight guy and straight bird. Apart from the pummeling they are pretty useless as far as company goes.

I can`t think of one bird I would call to come and wtach the footy with me if there were no strings attached. What would be the point of hanging out with a bird unless you were secretly trying to get a root out of it?

Birds are for pummeling and blokes are for mates. Not the other way around.
SamWise72
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1346
Joined: 02 Jul 2011, 16:41

Re: Gay boxers.

Post by SamWise72 »

Wow, well I hope nobody assumes from that, that I agree with you. Pummelling? Wow. What a class act. The assumption is that people who make a lot of NOISE about being repulsed are suppressing their true feelings. And of course, if women can find blokes attractive, it doesn't seem so far fetched that some men would. I'm not sure I've got anything else to say to anyone who has that low and opinion of women, though.
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5512
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: Gay boxers.

Post by forcefraser »

SamWise72 wrote:Wow, well I hope nobody assumes from that, that I agree with you. Pummelling? Wow. What a class act. The assumption is that people who make a lot of NOISE about being repulsed are suppressing their true feelings. And of course, if women can find blokes attractive, it doesn't seem so far fetched that some men would. I'm not sure I've got anything else to say to anyone who has that low and opinion of women, though.
I don`t have a low opinion of women at all. I let one of them marry me for christ sakes. I love women, but then again I am probably supressing my true feelings and would rather be chasing some hairy arsed bloke looking for a face full of fudge.

Of course women find blokes attractive, It`s a natural part of the reproduction process. Bloke pummels bird, bird has nipper. Not bloke pummels bloke and gets a shat covered sausage. I`m glad you don`t agree with me, as I imagine we would most likely not get on too well.
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5512
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: Gay boxers.

Post by forcefraser »

The Dark Destroyer wrote:Let her marry you? She was a lucky girl.
I'd'consider her fairly lucky. In addition to my great sense of humour, I am also a generous soul who buys her presents.

On her last birthday I gave her a shovel and told her she was no longer just a dishwasher, but she was now also a snowplough.

It's'important to give them job titles to keep their confidence up.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Gay boxers.

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Hey, you know what, nobody is forcing you to bum people, if you find it repulsive, fine, I'm not into either, but that doesn't mean i object to anyone else being turned on by it, it's called tolerance.

Hey, I find the idea of eating seals which have been buried in the ground for six months repulsive, but if an innuit wants to do it, be my guest.

The more gay men, the more women left for me, i couldn't give a toss.
misterpunch
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1252
Joined: 13 Jan 2012, 17:48

Re: Gay boxers.

Post by misterpunch »

i wrote previously that i found some amusement in a post by forcefraser...i have to say now that i was rash. it has only encouraged him to be very offensive indeed.

forcefraser you claim to "...love women.." you dont certainly dont love women if you view them simply as "pummel fodder" - men and women cant have a platonic relationship? what the f,,k do you do all day long with your missus after the 2 minute pummelling is over?
kevo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6559
Joined: 30 Apr 2003, 14:30

Re: Gay boxers.

Post by kevo »

That forcefraser, eh? He's such a bloody bloke.
TJ77
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1352
Joined: 19 Sep 2010, 13:01

Re: Gay boxers.

Post by TJ77 »

jtourettes wrote:
TJ77 wrote:Why the interest? Would the gay community gain anything from boxers coming out?
Equally what does boxing gain from fighters declaring their sexuality?
Probably nothing in either case.
The gay community gains role models outside of the flouncy, camp type in the public eye.
Fair point :salut: If im honest we get barraged with gayness in every aspect of life these days .(very difficult to write this without sounding like a homophobe).Im all for people to be able to live openly and its obviously better these days for gay people if they want to come out.Due to more understanding in society but i think they are over represented in fictional television and pardon the punn but it gets rammed down our throats at times.
Basically who you choose to shag is no ones business but your own .
Someone wants to tell them benders that ........Joking
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5512
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: Gay boxers.

Post by forcefraser »

misterpunch wrote:i wrote previously that i found some amusement in a post by forcefraser...i have to say now that i was rash. it has only encouraged him to be very offensive indeed.

forcefraser you claim to "...love women.." you dont certainly dont love women if you view them simply as "pummel fodder" - men and women cant have a platonic relationship? what the f,,k do you do all day long with your missus after the 2 minute pummelling is over?

Unlike most blokes these days who are whipped into line by their missus, walking two feet behind them on a shopping trip carrying plastic bags, I don`t tend to hang around my missus all day long. Firstly I am at work, then there is sport to watch on the TV, training at the gym, footy training and wanking, thus there is not that much time for the missus.

I was over in the UK at Christmas and was shocked to see how women appear to have taken the upper hand. Screaming at their blokes in public, driving cars and even having their own money. I overheard some luckless clown when asked if he would be out that night, reply with a shit eating grin that "I will just have to ask the boss first" (meaning his wife)

I felt like shaking the maggot into life and telling him that apart form arse buggery (obviously) hearinga bloke openly admit to marital subversity in such a manner is the most replulsive thing a bloke can hear.

Where are all the proper blokes gone? The UK has turned into a load of coffee bar ponces who heel at their missus`s demands and dare not speak their minds for fear of adverse reaction. Either that or they are running around chasing same sex arse, speaking in a fairy accent and claiming that "pink is the new black"

My advice, as a real bloke, man up and find some balls. Women are not attracted to cowering cabbages who do what they are told. Pummel them proper and they will fall into line. Women are not equal to men, if they were they would also be able to piss standing up without a problem, but they can`t and there is a reason for that. Any bloke who spends his days agreeing with his missus for an easy life or simply being ordered around like a dog is obviously in the wrong relationship. GET OUT NOW, it will only lead to misery. Birds don`t like wimps, they like hard fornicating real men like me :box:

Peace out brothers or should I say brothers acting a sisters. Wise up, stay safe and share the love and if you have to shag an arse, make sure it`s clean.
sweetscience
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2816
Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09

Re: Gay boxers.

Post by sweetscience »

Forcefraser you are an absolute legend :bow:
TJ77
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1352
Joined: 19 Sep 2010, 13:01

Re: Gay boxers.

Post by TJ77 »

sweetscience wrote:Forcefraser you are an absolute legend :bow:
Agreed very funny.
pugnus
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1
Joined: 18 Feb 2013, 12:16

Re: Gay boxers.

Post by pugnus »

Well Dr Kinsey suggested around 10% of men were ' homoerotic' and less than 3 % acted on those feelings so figure it out for yourself. I knew of a trainer who was gay and it was never an issue and why should it be , it just a persons natural sexuality, it's not a chosen option you are born that way....!
rhino222
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6618
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 09:38

Re: Gay boxers.

Post by rhino222 »

Forcefraser is my man and I want to share beer with him. Men who think male on male is ok should be forced to back scuttle a hairy arsed lorry driver with a pilonidal sinus!

Then see if they change their mind!
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11810
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Gay boxers.

Post by Old bones Ian »

rhino222 wrote:Forcefraser is my man and I want to share beer with him. Men who think male on male is ok should be forced to back scuttle a hairy arsed lorry driver with a pilonidal sinus!

Then see if they change their mind!
Just share beer with him? Thats how Brokeback Mountain started
misterpunch
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1252
Joined: 13 Jan 2012, 17:48

Re: Gay boxers.

Post by misterpunch »

this could be the start of a beooooootiful friendship
rob h
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 610
Joined: 15 Dec 2006, 08:36

Re: Gay boxers.

Post by rob h »

I nearly got moisturiser in my eye from laughing so much then
Post Reply