Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky
-
Black Sam Bellamy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1476
- Joined: 25 Sep 2008, 13:51
Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky
After the Heavyweight Prizefighter train-wreck, tonight's bill was totally uncompetitive in the main. Despite Froch and friends' valiant attempts to suggest otherwise. This Matchroom monopoly isn't healthy. Poor quality cheap opponents. Looks like only meaningful fights will be PPV moving forward. Totally unsatisfactory.
-
Ratchet Exits Nu
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 645
- Joined: 26 Sep 2012, 18:04
Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky
Black Sam Bellamy wrote:After the Heavyweight Prizefighter train-wreck, tonight's bill was totally uncompetitive in the main. Despite Froch and friends' valiant attempts to suggest otherwise. This Matchroom monopoly isn't healthy. Poor quality cheap opponents. Looks like only meaningful fights will be PPV moving forward. Totally unsatisfactory.
Agree.....
Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky
It has been very bad since Hearn took over.
-
Ratchet Exits Nu
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 645
- Joined: 26 Sep 2012, 18:04
Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky
Don't worry, MATCHROOM will charge us PPV for anything decent.

Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky
I thought Adam Smith had been killed for a good second there....
Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky
These IBF Inter-Continental title fight head liners are starting to annoy me.
Since the exclusive Matchroom contract, tonight was the worst card. 3 main fights all dreadfully one sided. And it's not like there were lots of late drop outs either.
Not good enough.
Since the exclusive Matchroom contract, tonight was the worst card. 3 main fights all dreadfully one sided. And it's not like there were lots of late drop outs either.
Not good enough.
-
Rob nelson
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 19
- Joined: 11 Jul 2011, 15:34
Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky
Cheap show

Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky
Groves's fight was particularly bad.
I know they were trying to showcase him, but the opponent was dreadful; they went far too low imo.
I know they were trying to showcase him, but the opponent was dreadful; they went far too low imo.
-
Final round
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02
Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky
You want a proper fight pay PPV money otherwise Sir Carl and Messr Kessler will not trade fisticuffsRob nelson wrote:Cheap show![]()
-
Ratchet Exits Nu
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 645
- Joined: 26 Sep 2012, 18:04
Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky
Final round wrote:You want a proper fight pay PPV money otherwise Sir Carl and Messr Kessler will not trade fisticuffsRob nelson wrote:Cheap show![]()
I pay for SKY SPORTS, that should be enough, but Carl deserves the £££s...This time!
-
Hagler2002
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3512
- Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04
Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky
People who subscribe to sky sports are already paying good money!Final yearround wrote:You want a proper fight pay PPV money otherwise Sir Carl and Messr Kessler will not trade fisticuffsRob nelson wrote:Cheap show![]()
You dont see Man Utd V Liverpool been put onto PPV do you!
-
MightyWarrior
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13357
- Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01
Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky
Yep, Smith took over and fcuked it up in record time. He's a disaster.
Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky
Only a matter of time before the "big games" are made PPV imo.Hagler2002 wrote:People who subscribe to sky sports are already paying good money!Final yearround wrote:You want a proper fight pay PPV money otherwise Sir Carl and Messr Kessler will not trade fisticuffsRob nelson wrote:Cheap show![]()
You dont see Man Utd V Liverpool been put onto PPV do you!
-
Khaosai-Galaxy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2739
- Joined: 29 Apr 2007, 12:15
Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky
Black Sam Bellamy wrote:After the Heavyweight Prizefighter train-wreck, tonight's bill was totally uncompetitive in the main. Despite Froch and friends' valiant attempts to suggest otherwise. This Matchroom monopoly isn't healthy. Poor quality cheap opponents. Looks like only meaningful fights will be PPV moving forward. Totally unsatisfactory.
Matchroom have a monopoly?
Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky
MightyWarrior wrote:Yep, Smith took over and fcuked it up in record time. He's a disaster.
I've tried many times to give the oaf the benefit of the doubt but he has consistently proven himself a useless sycophant. I thought he conducted himself particularly poorly during the Gavin Rees post fight interview. I wish Gary Lockett had of whacked him.
-
righthook
- Heavyweight

Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky
A bit harsh that I think!Black Sam Bellamy wrote:After the Heavyweight Prizefighter train-wreck, tonight's bill was totally uncompetitive in the main. Despite Froch and friends' valiant attempts to suggest otherwise. This Matchroom monopoly isn't healthy. Poor quality cheap opponents. Looks like only meaningful fights will be PPV moving forward. Totally unsatisfactory.
Your right it wasn't the best show tonight but don't forget groves opponent had 1 weeks notice
Due to groves switching promoters.
Am not saying tonight's show was good but we have been getting some good shows recently from sky and with all the new crop coming through it will get better an better.
Another thing worth mentioning is that people have far to high expectations. Lets be real here if u want to see 50/50 world class fights j need to pay for them simple as that. I see a few people on here crying about paying ppv and saying they pay for sky sports. Boxing gets a tiny amount of money we pay for sky sports there is nowhere near enough money from sky sports to have great fights all the time. If people don't like paying for ppv it's simple don't get it and don't watch the big fights. Same with sky sports if yous are not happy with the fights there producing then get rid of sky sports no one puts a gun to ya head to watch it.
Se people just moan for the sake of moaning
-
Boxingcutsman
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 783
- Joined: 30 May 2012, 21:35
Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky
A lot of you posters and people involved in the sport have been laughing and enjoying the recent downfalls of a certain other big promoter for what ever your own personal reasons, but from a true boxing fans point of view I just hope after tonights yet again appalling show on Sky that these people start to wake up and realise that boxing will be left in a bad way and alienate it's self from the wider audiences appeal if it keeps going the way it's going under Matchroom's monopoly with Sky. Since there monopoly has begun they stage a show every few weeks and they have been consistently poor quality, I can think of only a couple of shows where they have been ok to watch, we need all these promoters, and the Tv companys to show not only the big time promoters but the promoters who struggle to put on IMO better quality fights in the small hall's to give people a wider choice and to keep the non hard core fans interested other wise its only boxing that is going to suffer. Maybe the fickle will start to realise that soon.
-
Jeff Thomas
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3016
- Joined: 30 Apr 2009, 06:32
Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky
Pump some money into VIP, Goodwin and Coldwells shows.Boxingcutsman wrote:A lot of you posters and people involved in the sport have been laughing and enjoying the recent downfalls of a certain other big promoter for what ever your own personal reasons, but from a true boxing fans point of view I just hope after tonights yet again appalling show on Sky that these people start to wake up and realise that boxing will be left in a bad way and alienate it's self from the wider audiences appeal if it keeps going the way it's going under Matchroom's monopoly with Sky. Since there monopoly has begun they stage a show every few weeks and they have been consistently poor quality, I can think of only a couple of shows where they have been ok to watch, we need all these promoters, and the Tv companys to show not only the big time promoters but the promoters who struggle to put on IMO better quality fights in the small hall's to give people a wider choice and to keep the non hard core fans interested other wise its only boxing that is going to suffer. Maybe the fickle will start to realise that soon.
Give them a chance to build some interest in their fighters.
That would make sense now.
Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky
Remind me if the great shows that were broadcast each and every week when Sky had four promoters?Boxingcutsman wrote:A lot of you posters and people involved in the sport have been laughing and enjoying the recent downfalls of a certain other big promoter for what ever your own personal reasons, but from a true boxing fans point of view I just hope after tonights yet again appalling show on Sky that these people start to wake up and realise that boxing will be left in a bad way and alienate it's self from the wider audiences appeal if it keeps going the way it's going under Matchroom's monopoly with Sky. Since there monopoly has begun they stage a show every few weeks and they have been consistently poor quality, I can think of only a couple of shows where they have been ok to watch, we need all these promoters, and the Tv companys to show not only the big time promoters but the promoters who struggle to put on IMO better quality fights in the small hall's to give people a wider choice and to keep the non hard core fans interested other wise its only boxing that is going to suffer. Maybe the fickle will start to realise that soon.
The 4 promoter situation certainly did not encourage aggressive match making and the shows during that time were consistently weak and uncompetitive.
And please stop calling the situation a monopoly. How can it be a monopoly when boxing is available on Sky, BN, Loaded, C5, ESPN, Eurosport as well as online via you tube channels, coldwell app, etc. the situation is about as far from a monopoly as possible. In fact, it would be more accurate to describe Henessey as having a Terrestrial monopoly as his shows are the only ones available thru non-sub TV.
-
The Insider
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 2581
- Joined: 26 Mar 2012, 11:21
Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky
Hearn hasn't got a monopoly on boxing, but he does have a monopoly on boxing shown by sky which historically, over the last 10 years, has been televised boxings biggest outlet. And yes, since Hearn has had his "monopoly" with sky the shows have gone to shit. I'd still rather pay for BN, Codlwell TV and any other boxing app or pay to view channel than give sky a subscription for the tat they are showing lately.
-
jonnyyorkshu
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 449
- Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:12
Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky
Clarke vs Camacho was fun,poor but fun.
I cant remember the last 50/50 top of the bill fight matchroom put on.
I cant remember the last 50/50 top of the bill fight matchroom put on.
-
saturday_kid
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 847
- Joined: 14 May 2009, 04:05
Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky
Boxingcutsman wrote:A lot of you posters and people involved in the sport have been laughing and enjoying the recent downfalls of a certain other big promoter for what ever your own personal reasons, but from a true boxing fans point of view I just hope after tonights yet again appalling show on Sky that these people start to wake up and realise that boxing will be left in a bad way and alienate it's self from the wider audiences appeal if it keeps going the way it's going under Matchroom's monopoly with Sky. Since there monopoly has begun they stage a show every few weeks and they have been consistently poor quality, I can think of only a couple of shows where they have been ok to watch, we need all these promoters, and the Tv companys to show not only the big time promoters but the promoters who struggle to put on IMO better quality fights in the small hall's to give people a wider choice and to keep the non hard core fans interested other wise its only boxing that is going to suffer. Maybe the fickle will start to realise that soon.
Hit. Nail. Head
Agree entirely.
I'm no big fan of FW, and have no affiliation to any promoter - but as a fan I want to see the best fight the best - and would much rather see the best domesticfighters fight each other for the lonsdale than see one of our "future stars" fight for a bollocksy international intercontinental bauble against some argentinian i've never heard off.
-
Final round
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02
Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky
Bute v Froch.jonnyyorkshu wrote:Clarke vs Camacho was fun,poor but fun.![]()
I cant remember the last 50/50 top of the bill fight matchroom put on.
Eddie got given the keys to Sky boxing on the back of that fight.
-
jonnyyorkshu
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 449
- Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:12
Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky
i would rather watch a even,small hall,domestic fight than a big name fighting a no hope import any day.
