Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky

Black Sam Bellamy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1476
Joined: 25 Sep 2008, 13:51

Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky

Post by Black Sam Bellamy »

After the Heavyweight Prizefighter train-wreck, tonight's bill was totally uncompetitive in the main. Despite Froch and friends' valiant attempts to suggest otherwise. This Matchroom monopoly isn't healthy. Poor quality cheap opponents. Looks like only meaningful fights will be PPV moving forward. Totally unsatisfactory.
Ratchet Exits Nu
Super Middleweight
Posts: 645
Joined: 26 Sep 2012, 18:04

Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky

Post by Ratchet Exits Nu »

Black Sam Bellamy wrote:After the Heavyweight Prizefighter train-wreck, tonight's bill was totally uncompetitive in the main. Despite Froch and friends' valiant attempts to suggest otherwise. This Matchroom monopoly isn't healthy. Poor quality cheap opponents. Looks like only meaningful fights will be PPV moving forward. Totally unsatisfactory.

Agree.....
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky

Post by Horse »

It has been very bad since Hearn took over.
Ratchet Exits Nu
Super Middleweight
Posts: 645
Joined: 26 Sep 2012, 18:04

Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky

Post by Ratchet Exits Nu »

Don't worry, MATCHROOM will charge us PPV for anything decent.

:roll:
n1ebf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4267
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 10:33

Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky

Post by n1ebf »

I thought Adam Smith had been killed for a good second there....
Jack B
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 324
Joined: 18 Jan 2008, 13:51

Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky

Post by Jack B »

These IBF Inter-Continental title fight head liners are starting to annoy me.

Since the exclusive Matchroom contract, tonight was the worst card. 3 main fights all dreadfully one sided. And it's not like there were lots of late drop outs either.

Not good enough.
bfchunk
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 884
Joined: 28 Sep 2009, 15:39

Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky

Post by bfchunk »

Image
Rob nelson
Cruiserweight
Posts: 19
Joined: 11 Jul 2011, 15:34

Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky

Post by Rob nelson »

Cheap show :verysad: :evil:
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky

Post by crusader »

Groves's fight was particularly bad.

I know they were trying to showcase him, but the opponent was dreadful; they went far too low imo.
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky

Post by Final round »

Rob nelson wrote:Cheap show :verysad: :evil:
You want a proper fight pay PPV money otherwise Sir Carl and Messr Kessler will not trade fisticuffs
Ratchet Exits Nu
Super Middleweight
Posts: 645
Joined: 26 Sep 2012, 18:04

Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky

Post by Ratchet Exits Nu »

Final round wrote:
Rob nelson wrote:Cheap show :verysad: :evil:
You want a proper fight pay PPV money otherwise Sir Carl and Messr Kessler will not trade fisticuffs

I pay for SKY SPORTS, that should be enough, but Carl deserves the £££s...This time!
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky

Post by Hagler2002 »

Final yearround wrote:
Rob nelson wrote:Cheap show :verysad: :evil:
You want a proper fight pay PPV money otherwise Sir Carl and Messr Kessler will not trade fisticuffs
People who subscribe to sky sports are already paying good money!

You dont see Man Utd V Liverpool been put onto PPV do you!
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13357
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky

Post by MightyWarrior »

Yep, Smith took over and fcuked it up in record time. He's a disaster.
Deno1986
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5349
Joined: 25 Jul 2009, 06:58

Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky

Post by Deno1986 »

Hagler2002 wrote:
Final yearround wrote:
Rob nelson wrote:Cheap show :verysad: :evil:
You want a proper fight pay PPV money otherwise Sir Carl and Messr Kessler will not trade fisticuffs
People who subscribe to sky sports are already paying good money!

You dont see Man Utd V Liverpool been put onto PPV do you!
Only a matter of time before the "big games" are made PPV imo.
Khaosai-Galaxy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2739
Joined: 29 Apr 2007, 12:15

Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky

Post by Khaosai-Galaxy »

Black Sam Bellamy wrote:After the Heavyweight Prizefighter train-wreck, tonight's bill was totally uncompetitive in the main. Despite Froch and friends' valiant attempts to suggest otherwise. This Matchroom monopoly isn't healthy. Poor quality cheap opponents. Looks like only meaningful fights will be PPV moving forward. Totally unsatisfactory.

Matchroom have a monopoly?
Tomasino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7876
Joined: 24 Apr 2010, 16:39

Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky

Post by Tomasino »

MightyWarrior wrote:Yep, Smith took over and fcuked it up in record time. He's a disaster.

I've tried many times to give the oaf the benefit of the doubt but he has consistently proven himself a useless sycophant. I thought he conducted himself particularly poorly during the Gavin Rees post fight interview. I wish Gary Lockett had of whacked him.
righthook
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky

Post by righthook »

Black Sam Bellamy wrote:After the Heavyweight Prizefighter train-wreck, tonight's bill was totally uncompetitive in the main. Despite Froch and friends' valiant attempts to suggest otherwise. This Matchroom monopoly isn't healthy. Poor quality cheap opponents. Looks like only meaningful fights will be PPV moving forward. Totally unsatisfactory.
A bit harsh that I think!

Your right it wasn't the best show tonight but don't forget groves opponent had 1 weeks notice
Due to groves switching promoters.

Am not saying tonight's show was good but we have been getting some good shows recently from sky and with all the new crop coming through it will get better an better.

Another thing worth mentioning is that people have far to high expectations. Lets be real here if u want to see 50/50 world class fights j need to pay for them simple as that. I see a few people on here crying about paying ppv and saying they pay for sky sports. Boxing gets a tiny amount of money we pay for sky sports there is nowhere near enough money from sky sports to have great fights all the time. If people don't like paying for ppv it's simple don't get it and don't watch the big fights. Same with sky sports if yous are not happy with the fights there producing then get rid of sky sports no one puts a gun to ya head to watch it.

Se people just moan for the sake of moaning
Boxingcutsman
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 783
Joined: 30 May 2012, 21:35

Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky

Post by Boxingcutsman »

A lot of you posters and people involved in the sport have been laughing and enjoying the recent downfalls of a certain other big promoter for what ever your own personal reasons, but from a true boxing fans point of view I just hope after tonights yet again appalling show on Sky that these people start to wake up and realise that boxing will be left in a bad way and alienate it's self from the wider audiences appeal if it keeps going the way it's going under Matchroom's monopoly with Sky. Since there monopoly has begun they stage a show every few weeks and they have been consistently poor quality, I can think of only a couple of shows where they have been ok to watch, we need all these promoters, and the Tv companys to show not only the big time promoters but the promoters who struggle to put on IMO better quality fights in the small hall's to give people a wider choice and to keep the non hard core fans interested other wise its only boxing that is going to suffer. Maybe the fickle will start to realise that soon.
Jeff Thomas
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3016
Joined: 30 Apr 2009, 06:32

Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky

Post by Jeff Thomas »

Boxingcutsman wrote:A lot of you posters and people involved in the sport have been laughing and enjoying the recent downfalls of a certain other big promoter for what ever your own personal reasons, but from a true boxing fans point of view I just hope after tonights yet again appalling show on Sky that these people start to wake up and realise that boxing will be left in a bad way and alienate it's self from the wider audiences appeal if it keeps going the way it's going under Matchroom's monopoly with Sky. Since there monopoly has begun they stage a show every few weeks and they have been consistently poor quality, I can think of only a couple of shows where they have been ok to watch, we need all these promoters, and the Tv companys to show not only the big time promoters but the promoters who struggle to put on IMO better quality fights in the small hall's to give people a wider choice and to keep the non hard core fans interested other wise its only boxing that is going to suffer. Maybe the fickle will start to realise that soon.
Pump some money into VIP, Goodwin and Coldwells shows.

Give them a chance to build some interest in their fighters.

That would make sense now.
earsjohn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1691
Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 14:34

Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky

Post by earsjohn »

Boxingcutsman wrote:A lot of you posters and people involved in the sport have been laughing and enjoying the recent downfalls of a certain other big promoter for what ever your own personal reasons, but from a true boxing fans point of view I just hope after tonights yet again appalling show on Sky that these people start to wake up and realise that boxing will be left in a bad way and alienate it's self from the wider audiences appeal if it keeps going the way it's going under Matchroom's monopoly with Sky. Since there monopoly has begun they stage a show every few weeks and they have been consistently poor quality, I can think of only a couple of shows where they have been ok to watch, we need all these promoters, and the Tv companys to show not only the big time promoters but the promoters who struggle to put on IMO better quality fights in the small hall's to give people a wider choice and to keep the non hard core fans interested other wise its only boxing that is going to suffer. Maybe the fickle will start to realise that soon.
Remind me if the great shows that were broadcast each and every week when Sky had four promoters?

The 4 promoter situation certainly did not encourage aggressive match making and the shows during that time were consistently weak and uncompetitive.

And please stop calling the situation a monopoly. How can it be a monopoly when boxing is available on Sky, BN, Loaded, C5, ESPN, Eurosport as well as online via you tube channels, coldwell app, etc. the situation is about as far from a monopoly as possible. In fact, it would be more accurate to describe Henessey as having a Terrestrial monopoly as his shows are the only ones available thru non-sub TV.
The Insider
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 2581
Joined: 26 Mar 2012, 11:21

Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky

Post by The Insider »

Hearn hasn't got a monopoly on boxing, but he does have a monopoly on boxing shown by sky which historically, over the last 10 years, has been televised boxings biggest outlet. And yes, since Hearn has had his "monopoly" with sky the shows have gone to shit. I'd still rather pay for BN, Codlwell TV and any other boxing app or pay to view channel than give sky a subscription for the tat they are showing lately.
jonnyyorkshu
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 449
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:12

Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky

Post by jonnyyorkshu »

Clarke vs Camacho was fun,poor but fun. :box:

I cant remember the last 50/50 top of the bill fight matchroom put on.
saturday_kid
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 847
Joined: 14 May 2009, 04:05

Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky

Post by saturday_kid »

Boxingcutsman wrote:A lot of you posters and people involved in the sport have been laughing and enjoying the recent downfalls of a certain other big promoter for what ever your own personal reasons, but from a true boxing fans point of view I just hope after tonights yet again appalling show on Sky that these people start to wake up and realise that boxing will be left in a bad way and alienate it's self from the wider audiences appeal if it keeps going the way it's going under Matchroom's monopoly with Sky. Since there monopoly has begun they stage a show every few weeks and they have been consistently poor quality, I can think of only a couple of shows where they have been ok to watch, we need all these promoters, and the Tv companys to show not only the big time promoters but the promoters who struggle to put on IMO better quality fights in the small hall's to give people a wider choice and to keep the non hard core fans interested other wise its only boxing that is going to suffer. Maybe the fickle will start to realise that soon.

Hit. Nail. Head

Agree entirely.

I'm no big fan of FW, and have no affiliation to any promoter - but as a fan I want to see the best fight the best - and would much rather see the best domesticfighters fight each other for the lonsdale than see one of our "future stars" fight for a bollocksy international intercontinental bauble against some argentinian i've never heard off.
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky

Post by Final round »

jonnyyorkshu wrote:Clarke vs Camacho was fun,poor but fun. :box:

I cant remember the last 50/50 top of the bill fight matchroom put on.
Bute v Froch.

Eddie got given the keys to Sky boxing on the back of that fight.
jonnyyorkshu
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 449
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:12

Re: Adam Smith has killed boxing on Sky

Post by jonnyyorkshu »

i would rather watch a even,small hall,domestic fight than a big name fighting a no hope import any day.
Post Reply