It was only a few minutes long and was basically just him apologisingAdamj1987 wrote:i dont know they guy looked nervous and who wants to be talked down to by lorraine kelly she will make you feel badAndypittcov wrote:Well what a waste of time that was
also "i wont do it again"
"i know where you live"
Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!
-
Andypittcov
- Heavyweight

Re: Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!
-
Andypittcov
- Heavyweight

Re: Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!
Can't agree with this, I thought he looked unbelievably at ease considering the circumstancesFinch wrote:Why did he agree to go on there? He looked terrified and was purely lip service being provided.
Re: Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!
its the principle of it anyone who watched it knows who he is and what a vile person he is and hopefully it will reach a wider audience and make other people think twice about doing the same as him.Andypittcov wrote:It was only a few minutes long and was basically just him apologisingAdamj1987 wrote:i dont know they guy looked nervous and who wants to be talked down to by lorraine kelly she will make you feel badAndypittcov wrote:Well what a waste of time that was
also "i wont do it again"
"i know where you live"
it still stands that lorriane will make you feel like you've let everyone down
Re: Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!
This.MachoMan09 wrote:What's that? Giving a bloke grief on a social networking site and then getting paid by a national television company to sit and get a ticking off from a Scottish witch for a few minutes to entertain a few million daytime television watchers? Where's the deterrent if you're skint and want to make a fast buck?Adamj1987 wrote:its the principle of it anyone who watched it knows who he is and what a vile person he is and hopefully it will reach a wider audience and make other people think twice about doing the same as him.
It's like a weeks wages for an appearance on that show.
Re: Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!
Getting this fella on tv brings feeding the troll to a new level.
Re: Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!
banjo wrote:This.MachoMan09 wrote:What's that? Giving a bloke grief on a social networking site and then getting paid by a national television company to sit and get a ticking off from a Scottish witch for a few minutes to entertain a few million daytime television watchers? Where's the deterrent if you're skint and want to make a fast buck?Adamj1987 wrote:its the principle of it anyone who watched it knows who he is and what a vile person he is and hopefully it will reach a wider audience and make other people think twice about doing the same as him.
It's like a weeks wages for an appearance on that show.
Really?
Re: Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!
Think people are missing the point the media run with things all Curtis did was tell his brief story .The fact this plum bag was willing to ridicule himself further by grovelling on telly whatever he was paid .
He hasnt gained anything apart from years of abuse from everyone who recognises him on nights out in Sheffield.
He hasnt gained anything apart from years of abuse from everyone who recognises him on nights out in Sheffield.
Re: Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!
I guess Curtis was paid and it is all exposure for him, but the show would not have happen if Curtis had not turned up. Trolls will take great encouragement from this if they feel they can get such exposure. Woodhouse actually said in the I film interview that abuse has increased.TJ77 wrote:Think people are missing the point the media run with things all Curtis did was tell his brief story .The fact this plum bag was willing to ridicule himself further by grovelling on telly whatever he was paid .
He hasnt gained anything apart from years of abuse from everyone who recognises him on nights out in Sheffield.
Re: Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!
Bet in some way it was nice not to be referred to as ''former Birmingham city footballer turned boxer''I dont think theres a league of trolls thinking this has broken the ice and is the way to go .Coco wrote:I guess Curtis was paid and it is all exposure for him, but the show would not have happen if Curtis had not turned up. Trolls will take great encouragement from this if they feel they can get such exposure. Woodhouse actually said in the I film interview that abuse has increased.TJ77 wrote:Think people are missing the point the media run with things all Curtis did was tell his brief story .The fact this plum bag was willing to ridicule himself further by grovelling on telly whatever he was paid .
He hasnt gained anything apart from years of abuse from everyone who recognises him on nights out in Sheffield.
Trolls are gonna be there as society always has a scum element nice to see one get a bit back .
Wont change the world either way but its one less mug on Curtis Woodhouse twitter .If there are copy cats then they look even more ridiculous now surely.
-
reggaereggae
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4723
- Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01
Re: Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!
Intimidation, harassment......threatening behaviour. I'm not a lawyer but I imagine these charges might be applicableHagler2002 wrote:What for?reggaereggae wrote:Curtis is lucky he didn't get nicked
-
Andypittcov
- Heavyweight

Re: Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!
The tweets were all of those thingsreggaereggae wrote:Intimidation, harassment......threatening behaviour. I'm not a lawyer but I imagine these charges might be applicableHagler2002 wrote:What for?reggaereggae wrote:Curtis is lucky he didn't get nicked
Re: Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!
Come off it mateAndypittcov wrote:The tweets were all of those thingsreggaereggae wrote: Intimidation, harassment......threatening behaviour. I'm not a lawyer but I imagine these charges might be applicable
Re: Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!
Claiming self defence when you drive 75 miles is difficult.
Legal protocol means you would need to report the offender to the police unless you are in imminent danger.
Legal protocol means you would need to report the offender to the police unless you are in imminent danger.
-
reggaereggae
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4723
- Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01
Re: Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!
Good point Andy - and it serves to illustrate why traditional law is ill equipped to deal with new technology.
Both could arguably be subject to breaking laws.
Both could arguably be subject to breaking laws.
Re: Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!
Doesn't matter if you walk 5000 miles, and then 5000 more. If someone attacks you, you are entitled to defend yourself. Curtis is saying he wanted to explain a few things to him, which certainly isn't illegal. Attacking him phsically in response would however be illegal.Coco wrote:Claiming self defence when you drive 75 miles is difficult.
Legal protocol means you would need to report the offender to the police unless you are in imminent danger.
I think anyone who is getting to carried away about this needs to read back some of Woodhouses previous work around other fights. The guy is an understated comedic genius.
As for his tormenter, he's a bell end. When his daybreak cash is gone, he is still a bell end. Even a fool, when he holdeth his peace, is counted wise: and he that shutteth his lips is esteemed a man of understanding. Instead, he's just showed himself to be a cheap whore.
Re: Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JbgEJ95Gcokbilly bessey wrote:Is there a link anywhere to the daybreak show?
-
MightyWarrior
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13359
- Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01
Re: Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!
Just seen it now - you wonder what type of cretin bothers to abuse people on twitter, it's like a modern day obscene phone call.
But you can see this troll is really, really thick - apologies like a robot, but you can tell he'd get a hard on to do it again, if he wasn't in danger of getting caught out of course. What a creep.
Curtis should have been alowed to chin him live on TV - would have been well deserved.
But you can see this troll is really, really thick - apologies like a robot, but you can tell he'd get a hard on to do it again, if he wasn't in danger of getting caught out of course. What a creep.
Curtis should have been alowed to chin him live on TV - would have been well deserved.
Re: Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!
hmmm, shouldn't really lamp people but then you shouldn't really put you saliva soaked finger in someone's ear either.
That guy didn't seem like he was about to go away any time soon, professional tw@t.
You suspect if he reported it tho the guy would have to pay a fine and lose his livelihood cos of this moron.
-
loaded_gloves
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 1907
- Joined: 09 Mar 2011, 12:18
Re: Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!
Neither Curtis nor his trollish tormentor will have been paid a penny to appear on this show. It doesn't work that way, you don't get paid, just expenses which is essentially your train ticket.
-
el_grande_mauro_mina
- Lightweight
- Posts: 11215
- Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54
Re: Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!
Nice! Anyone who puts a salivia covered fingertip in your ear deserves a smack in the mouth - minimum.
Re: Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!
I was watching that video today! That guy was a complete pudendum! Its a shame he wasnt sparked out cold!Fat Git wrote:Nice! Anyone who puts a salivia covered fingertip in your ear deserves a smack in the mouth - minimum.