Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!

Andypittcov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!

Post by Andypittcov »

Adamj1987 wrote:
Andypittcov wrote:Well what a waste of time that was
i dont know they guy looked nervous and who wants to be talked down to by lorraine kelly she will make you feel bad

also "i wont do it again"
"i know where you live :twisted: "
It was only a few minutes long and was basically just him apologising
Andypittcov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!

Post by Andypittcov »

Finch wrote:Why did he agree to go on there? He looked terrified and was purely lip service being provided.
Can't agree with this, I thought he looked unbelievably at ease considering the circumstances
Adamj1987
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5400
Joined: 14 Oct 2008, 16:16

Re: Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!

Post by Adamj1987 »

Andypittcov wrote:
Adamj1987 wrote:
Andypittcov wrote:Well what a waste of time that was
i dont know they guy looked nervous and who wants to be talked down to by lorraine kelly she will make you feel bad

also "i wont do it again"
"i know where you live :twisted: "
It was only a few minutes long and was basically just him apologising
its the principle of it anyone who watched it knows who he is and what a vile person he is and hopefully it will reach a wider audience and make other people think twice about doing the same as him.

it still stands that lorriane will make you feel like you've let everyone down
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26472
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!

Post by banjo »

MachoMan09 wrote:
Adamj1987 wrote:its the principle of it anyone who watched it knows who he is and what a vile person he is and hopefully it will reach a wider audience and make other people think twice about doing the same as him.
What's that? Giving a bloke grief on a social networking site and then getting paid by a national television company to sit and get a ticking off from a Scottish witch for a few minutes to entertain a few million daytime television watchers? Where's the deterrent if you're skint and want to make a fast buck?
This.

It's like a weeks wages for an appearance on that show.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28528
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!

Post by Coco »

Getting this fella on tv brings feeding the troll to a new level.
Finch
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1129
Joined: 01 Mar 2008, 08:14

Re: Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!

Post by Finch »

banjo wrote:
MachoMan09 wrote:
Adamj1987 wrote:its the principle of it anyone who watched it knows who he is and what a vile person he is and hopefully it will reach a wider audience and make other people think twice about doing the same as him.
What's that? Giving a bloke grief on a social networking site and then getting paid by a national television company to sit and get a ticking off from a Scottish witch for a few minutes to entertain a few million daytime television watchers? Where's the deterrent if you're skint and want to make a fast buck?
This.

It's like a weeks wages for an appearance on that show.

Really?
TJ77
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1352
Joined: 19 Sep 2010, 13:01

Re: Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!

Post by TJ77 »

Think people are missing the point the media run with things all Curtis did was tell his brief story .The fact this plum bag was willing to ridicule himself further by grovelling on telly whatever he was paid .
He hasnt gained anything apart from years of abuse from everyone who recognises him on nights out in Sheffield.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28528
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!

Post by Coco »

TJ77 wrote:Think people are missing the point the media run with things all Curtis did was tell his brief story .The fact this plum bag was willing to ridicule himself further by grovelling on telly whatever he was paid .
He hasnt gained anything apart from years of abuse from everyone who recognises him on nights out in Sheffield.
I guess Curtis was paid and it is all exposure for him, but the show would not have happen if Curtis had not turned up. Trolls will take great encouragement from this if they feel they can get such exposure. Woodhouse actually said in the I film interview that abuse has increased.
TJ77
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1352
Joined: 19 Sep 2010, 13:01

Re: Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!

Post by TJ77 »

Coco wrote:
TJ77 wrote:Think people are missing the point the media run with things all Curtis did was tell his brief story .The fact this plum bag was willing to ridicule himself further by grovelling on telly whatever he was paid .
He hasnt gained anything apart from years of abuse from everyone who recognises him on nights out in Sheffield.
I guess Curtis was paid and it is all exposure for him, but the show would not have happen if Curtis had not turned up. Trolls will take great encouragement from this if they feel they can get such exposure. Woodhouse actually said in the I film interview that abuse has increased.
Bet in some way it was nice not to be referred to as ''former Birmingham city footballer turned boxer''I dont think theres a league of trolls thinking this has broken the ice and is the way to go .
Trolls are gonna be there as society always has a scum element nice to see one get a bit back .
Wont change the world either way but its one less mug on Curtis Woodhouse twitter .If there are copy cats then they look even more ridiculous now surely.
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!

Post by reggaereggae »

Hagler2002 wrote:
reggaereggae wrote:Curtis is lucky he didn't get nicked
What for? :oo
Intimidation, harassment......threatening behaviour. I'm not a lawyer but I imagine these charges might be applicable
Andypittcov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!

Post by Andypittcov »

reggaereggae wrote:
Hagler2002 wrote:
reggaereggae wrote:Curtis is lucky he didn't get nicked
What for? :oo
Intimidation, harassment......threatening behaviour. I'm not a lawyer but I imagine these charges might be applicable
The tweets were all of those things
n1ebf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4267
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 10:33

Re: Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!

Post by n1ebf »

Andypittcov wrote:
reggaereggae wrote: Intimidation, harassment......threatening behaviour. I'm not a lawyer but I imagine these charges might be applicable
The tweets were all of those things
Come off it mate
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28528
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!

Post by Coco »

Claiming self defence when you drive 75 miles is difficult.
Legal protocol means you would need to report the offender to the police unless you are in imminent danger.
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!

Post by reggaereggae »

Good point Andy - and it serves to illustrate why traditional law is ill equipped to deal with new technology.

Both could arguably be subject to breaking laws.
JamesH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1897
Joined: 08 Aug 2008, 09:16

Re: Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!

Post by JamesH »

Coco wrote:Claiming self defence when you drive 75 miles is difficult.
Legal protocol means you would need to report the offender to the police unless you are in imminent danger.
Doesn't matter if you walk 5000 miles, and then 5000 more. If someone attacks you, you are entitled to defend yourself. Curtis is saying he wanted to explain a few things to him, which certainly isn't illegal. Attacking him phsically in response would however be illegal.

I think anyone who is getting to carried away about this needs to read back some of Woodhouses previous work around other fights. The guy is an understated comedic genius.

As for his tormenter, he's a bell end. When his daybreak cash is gone, he is still a bell end. Even a fool, when he holdeth his peace, is counted wise: and he that shutteth his lips is esteemed a man of understanding. Instead, he's just showed himself to be a cheap whore.
Adamj1987
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5400
Joined: 14 Oct 2008, 16:16

Re: Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!

Post by Adamj1987 »

billy bessey wrote:Is there a link anywhere to the daybreak show?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JbgEJ95Gcok
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13358
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!

Post by MightyWarrior »

Just seen it now - you wonder what type of cretin bothers to abuse people on twitter, it's like a modern day obscene phone call.
But you can see this troll is really, really thick - apologies like a robot, but you can tell he'd get a hard on to do it again, if he wasn't in danger of getting caught out of course. What a creep.
Curtis should have been alowed to chin him live on TV - would have been well deserved.
n1ebf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4267
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 10:33

Re: Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!

Post by n1ebf »


hmmm, shouldn't really lamp people but then you shouldn't really put you saliva soaked finger in someone's ear either.
That guy didn't seem like he was about to go away any time soon, professional tw@t.
You suspect if he reported it tho the guy would have to pay a fine and lose his livelihood cos of this moron.
loaded_gloves
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1907
Joined: 09 Mar 2011, 12:18

Re: Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!

Post by loaded_gloves »

Neither Curtis nor his trollish tormentor will have been paid a penny to appear on this show. It doesn't work that way, you don't get paid, just expenses which is essentially your train ticket.
el_grande_mauro_mina
Lightweight
Posts: 11215
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54

Re: Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!

Post by el_grande_mauro_mina »

Nice! Anyone who puts a salivia covered fingertip in your ear deserves a smack in the mouth - minimum.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Curtis Woodhouse talking about "that incident" lol : Good !!

Post by lefty »

Fat Git wrote:
Nice! Anyone who puts a salivia covered fingertip in your ear deserves a smack in the mouth - minimum.
I was watching that video today! That guy was a complete pudendum! Its a shame he wasnt sparked out cold!
Post Reply