Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13498
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)
Stiverne beat Arreola tonight. Put him on his backside in the third and then won a widish decision.
I really think it would be wise for Fury's team to go this route rather than Pulev, and then defend the belt against the best guys out there. I think Pulev is too good, certainly wayyyyyyy better than Stiverne who's a bit of a plodder with better than average skills, basically better than average in most areas. Not sure if Fury has given up his ranking with WBC or not but just my take on it.
I really think it would be wise for Fury's team to go this route rather than Pulev, and then defend the belt against the best guys out there. I think Pulev is too good, certainly wayyyyyyy better than Stiverne who's a bit of a plodder with better than average skills, basically better than average in most areas. Not sure if Fury has given up his ranking with WBC or not but just my take on it.
-
el_grande_mauro_mina
- Lightweight
- Posts: 11215
- Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54
Re: Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)
I have just seen the fight now, Stiverne is bloody good and is all wrong for Tyson
Fury.
Fury.
Re: Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)
Fury will probably lose to both of them!jameswilson wrote:Stiverne beat Arreola tonight. Put him on his backside in the third and then won a widish decision.
I really think it would be wise for Fury's team to go this route rather than Pulev, and then defend the belt against the best guys out there. I think Pulev is too good, certainly wayyyyyyy better than Stiverne who's a bit of a plodder with better than average skills, basically better than average in most areas. Not sure if Fury has given up his ranking with WBC or not but just my take on it.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13498
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)
I disagree I think Fury would be able to use his height and workrate far more effectively against Stieverne than he would be able to against Pulev.Fat Git wrote:I have just seen the fight now, Stiverne is bloody good and is all wrong for Tyson
Fury.
-
el_grande_mauro_mina
- Lightweight
- Posts: 11215
- Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54
Re: Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)
Stiverne surprised me tonight, he showed great handspeed and has power, he would keepjameswilson wrote:I disagree I think Fury would be able to use his height and workrate far more effectively against Stieverne than he would be able to against Pulev.Fat Git wrote:I have just seen the fight now, Stiverne is bloody good and is all wrong for Tyson
Fury.
Fury down if Fury fought like he did against Cunningham.
I want to know what the ruckus was about between Don King and that woman in the ring.
Re: Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)
where did you two watch the fight? Stream?Fat Git wrote:Stiverne surprised me tonight, he showed great handspeed and has power, he would keepjameswilson wrote:I disagree I think Fury would be able to use his height and workrate far more effectively against Stieverne than he would be able to against Pulev.Fat Git wrote:I have just seen the fight now, Stiverne is bloody good and is all wrong for Tyson
Fury.
Fury down if Fury fought like he did against Cunningham.
I want to know what the ruckus was about between Don King and that woman in the ring.
-
el_grande_mauro_mina
- Lightweight
- Posts: 11215
- Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54
Re: Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)
HBO online after the Murray vs Martinez fight - fantastic fight. All action for 12 rounds.columbo wrote:where did you two watch the fight? Stream?Fat Git wrote:I disagree I think Fury would be able to use his height and workrate far more effectively against Stieverne than he would be able to against Pulev.jameswilson wrote:I have just seen the fight now, Stiverne is bloody good and is all wrong for Tyson
Fury.
Stiverne surprised me tonight, he showed great handspeed and has power, he would keep
Fury down if Fury fought like he did against Cunningham.
I want to know what the ruckus was about between Don King and that woman in the ring.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13498
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)
It was on the HBO telecast straight after the Martinez coverage.columbo wrote:where did you two watch the fight? Stream?Fat Git wrote:Stiverne surprised me tonight, he showed great handspeed and has power, he would keepjameswilson wrote:
I disagree I think Fury would be able to use his height and workrate far more effectively against Stieverne than he would be able to against Pulev.
Fury down if Fury fought like he did against Cunningham.
I want to know what the ruckus was about between Don King and that woman in the ring.
Re: Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)
I disagree I think Fury would be able to use his height and workrate far more effectively against Stieverne than he would be able to against Pulev.[/quote]
Stiverne surprised me tonight, he showed great handspeed and has power, he would keep
Fury down if Fury fought like he did against Cunningham.
I want to know what the ruckus was about between Don King and that woman in the ring.
[/quote]
where did you two watch the fight? Stream?[/quote]
It was on the HBO telecast straight after the Martinez coverage.[/quote]
I was watching on allegedly so didnt see it!
Stiverne surprised me tonight, he showed great handspeed and has power, he would keep
Fury down if Fury fought like he did against Cunningham.
I want to know what the ruckus was about between Don King and that woman in the ring.
where did you two watch the fight? Stream?[/quote]
It was on the HBO telecast straight after the Martinez coverage.[/quote]
I was watching on allegedly so didnt see it!
-
iamasadlittleboy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1877
- Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05
Re: Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)
Either Pulev or Stiverne would stop Fury.
Re: Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)
stiverne is now mandotary for vitali
so fury cant have a wbc eliminator
if stiverne hits fury its game over
so fury cant have a wbc eliminator
if stiverne hits fury its game over
Re: Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)
Pleased that Stiverne has finally made a breakthrough. I thought he was one to watch after his blowout of Kerton Manswell, even though Manswell's subsequent KO losses diluted the achievement considerably.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13498
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)
Well Vitali isn't fighting again is he so Fury could get a shot at Stiverne for the vacant title or the title that Stiverne gets handed.dammage7 wrote:stiverne is now mandotary for vitali
so fury cant have a wbc eliminator
if stiverne hits fury its game over
-
HomicideHenry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 18722
- Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43
Re: Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)
Peter Fury said in our interview, that he is only interested in three fights for Tyson and that is David Haye, Kubrat Pulev, and Vladimir Klitschko. However, he did say if things don't go quite their way in negotiations, they will try and get Tyson ranked in the top 5 in all the organisations so there be no choice at all but to force mandatory challenge on Klitschko.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17140
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)
Either Stiverne will fight Vitali, or Vitali retires and the WBC will just give the title to Stiverne. He could then defend against Fury, but he'd already be champion.
Re: Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)
I will tell you right now that Wlad will be one corner when that WBC comes up for grabs.
Prob Haye in the other.
Prob Haye in the other.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17140
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)
Nope. Stiverne fight Vitali or he will inherit the title - the WBC have done it before, it's in their rules and everything.G0mez wrote:I will tell you right now that Wlad will be one corner when that WBC comes up for grabs.
Prob Haye in the other.
Re: Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)
then he will fight wladkeithmoonhangover wrote:Nope. Stiverne fight Vitali or he will inherit the title - the WBC have done it before, it's in their rules and everything.G0mez wrote:I will tell you right now that Wlad will be one corner when that WBC comes up for grabs.
Prob Haye in the other.
-
loaded_gloves
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 1907
- Joined: 09 Mar 2011, 12:18
Re: Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)
He won't have to fight Wlad - Wlad has no sway with the WBC, he holds the other belts so is excluded from their rankings. Vitali cannot dictate what happens to his belt after he vacates.
Don King and the WBC have a long history, it will be Stiverne versus the usual Don King challengers.
Perhaps John Ruiz will be exhumed.
Don King and the WBC have a long history, it will be Stiverne versus the usual Don King challengers.
Perhaps John Ruiz will be exhumed.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17140
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)
No, but it'll be by far the biggest purse he will receive. Two easy defences and then Wlad.loaded_gloves wrote:He won't have to fight Wlad.
-
Old bones Ian
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 11811
- Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33
Re: Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)
Won a little bit on Stiverne last night, there is always the concern his chin was going to let him down, that early loss in his career still sticks in the memory. But i was impressed with him last night, stuck to his game plan well, and showed a new level of movement and punch output not seen before.
He was really digging in the body shots, nice left hooks downstairs and up again.
He was really digging in the body shots, nice left hooks downstairs and up again.