Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)

Post Reply
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13497
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)

Post by jameswilson »

Stiverne beat Arreola tonight. Put him on his backside in the third and then won a widish decision.

I really think it would be wise for Fury's team to go this route rather than Pulev, and then defend the belt against the best guys out there. I think Pulev is too good, certainly wayyyyyyy better than Stiverne who's a bit of a plodder with better than average skills, basically better than average in most areas. Not sure if Fury has given up his ranking with WBC or not but just my take on it.
el_grande_mauro_mina
Lightweight
Posts: 11215
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54

Re: Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)

Post by el_grande_mauro_mina »

I have just seen the fight now, Stiverne is bloody good and is all wrong for Tyson
Fury.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)

Post by lefty »

jameswilson wrote:Stiverne beat Arreola tonight. Put him on his backside in the third and then won a widish decision.

I really think it would be wise for Fury's team to go this route rather than Pulev, and then defend the belt against the best guys out there. I think Pulev is too good, certainly wayyyyyyy better than Stiverne who's a bit of a plodder with better than average skills, basically better than average in most areas. Not sure if Fury has given up his ranking with WBC or not but just my take on it.
Fury will probably lose to both of them!
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13497
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)

Post by jameswilson »

Fat Git wrote:I have just seen the fight now, Stiverne is bloody good and is all wrong for Tyson
Fury.
I disagree I think Fury would be able to use his height and workrate far more effectively against Stieverne than he would be able to against Pulev.
el_grande_mauro_mina
Lightweight
Posts: 11215
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54

Re: Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)

Post by el_grande_mauro_mina »

jameswilson wrote:
Fat Git wrote:I have just seen the fight now, Stiverne is bloody good and is all wrong for Tyson
Fury.
I disagree I think Fury would be able to use his height and workrate far more effectively against Stieverne than he would be able to against Pulev.
Stiverne surprised me tonight, he showed great handspeed and has power, he would keep
Fury down if Fury fought like he did against Cunningham.

I want to know what the ruckus was about between Don King and that woman in the ring. :lol:
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)

Post by lefty »

Fat Git wrote:
jameswilson wrote:
Fat Git wrote:I have just seen the fight now, Stiverne is bloody good and is all wrong for Tyson
Fury.
I disagree I think Fury would be able to use his height and workrate far more effectively against Stieverne than he would be able to against Pulev.
Stiverne surprised me tonight, he showed great handspeed and has power, he would keep
Fury down if Fury fought like he did against Cunningham.

I want to know what the ruckus was about between Don King and that woman in the ring. :lol:
where did you two watch the fight? Stream?
el_grande_mauro_mina
Lightweight
Posts: 11215
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54

Re: Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)

Post by el_grande_mauro_mina »

columbo wrote:
Fat Git wrote:
jameswilson wrote:I have just seen the fight now, Stiverne is bloody good and is all wrong for Tyson
Fury.
I disagree I think Fury would be able to use his height and workrate far more effectively against Stieverne than he would be able to against Pulev.

Stiverne surprised me tonight, he showed great handspeed and has power, he would keep
Fury down if Fury fought like he did against Cunningham.

I want to know what the ruckus was about between Don King and that woman in the ring. :lol:
where did you two watch the fight? Stream?
HBO online after the Murray vs Martinez fight - fantastic fight. All action for 12 rounds.
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13497
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)

Post by jameswilson »

columbo wrote:
Fat Git wrote:
jameswilson wrote:
I disagree I think Fury would be able to use his height and workrate far more effectively against Stieverne than he would be able to against Pulev.
Stiverne surprised me tonight, he showed great handspeed and has power, he would keep
Fury down if Fury fought like he did against Cunningham.

I want to know what the ruckus was about between Don King and that woman in the ring. :lol:
where did you two watch the fight? Stream?
It was on the HBO telecast straight after the Martinez coverage.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)

Post by lefty »

I disagree I think Fury would be able to use his height and workrate far more effectively against Stieverne than he would be able to against Pulev.[/quote]

Stiverne surprised me tonight, he showed great handspeed and has power, he would keep
Fury down if Fury fought like he did against Cunningham.

I want to know what the ruckus was about between Don King and that woman in the ring. :lol:[/quote]
where did you two watch the fight? Stream?[/quote]

It was on the HBO telecast straight after the Martinez coverage.[/quote]
I was watching on allegedly so didnt see it!
iamasadlittleboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1877
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05

Re: Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)

Post by iamasadlittleboy »

Either Pulev or Stiverne would stop Fury.
dammage7
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 129
Joined: 13 Jan 2012, 17:00

Re: Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)

Post by dammage7 »

stiverne is now mandotary for vitali
so fury cant have a wbc eliminator

if stiverne hits fury its game over
Kilburn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6720
Joined: 25 Jul 2002, 07:27

Re: Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)

Post by Kilburn »

Pleased that Stiverne has finally made a breakthrough. I thought he was one to watch after his blowout of Kerton Manswell, even though Manswell's subsequent KO losses diluted the achievement considerably.
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13497
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)

Post by jameswilson »

dammage7 wrote:stiverne is now mandotary for vitali
so fury cant have a wbc eliminator

if stiverne hits fury its game over
Well Vitali isn't fighting again is he so Fury could get a shot at Stiverne for the vacant title or the title that Stiverne gets handed.
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)

Post by HomicideHenry »

Peter Fury said in our interview, that he is only interested in three fights for Tyson and that is David Haye, Kubrat Pulev, and Vladimir Klitschko. However, he did say if things don't go quite their way in negotiations, they will try and get Tyson ranked in the top 5 in all the organisations so there be no choice at all but to force mandatory challenge on Klitschko.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17136
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Either Stiverne will fight Vitali, or Vitali retires and the WBC will just give the title to Stiverne. He could then defend against Fury, but he'd already be champion.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)

Post by whiskey »

I will tell you right now that Wlad will be one corner when that WBC comes up for grabs.

Prob Haye in the other.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17136
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)

Post by keithmoonhangover »

G0mez wrote:I will tell you right now that Wlad will be one corner when that WBC comes up for grabs.

Prob Haye in the other.
Nope. Stiverne fight Vitali or he will inherit the title - the WBC have done it before, it's in their rules and everything.
Adamj1987
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5400
Joined: 14 Oct 2008, 16:16

Re: Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)

Post by Adamj1987 »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
G0mez wrote:I will tell you right now that Wlad will be one corner when that WBC comes up for grabs.

Prob Haye in the other.
Nope. Stiverne fight Vitali or he will inherit the title - the WBC have done it before, it's in their rules and everything.
then he will fight wlad
loaded_gloves
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1907
Joined: 09 Mar 2011, 12:18

Re: Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)

Post by loaded_gloves »

He won't have to fight Wlad - Wlad has no sway with the WBC, he holds the other belts so is excluded from their rankings. Vitali cannot dictate what happens to his belt after he vacates.

Don King and the WBC have a long history, it will be Stiverne versus the usual Don King challengers.

Perhaps John Ruiz will be exhumed.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17136
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)

Post by keithmoonhangover »

loaded_gloves wrote:He won't have to fight Wlad.
No, but it'll be by far the biggest purse he will receive. Two easy defences and then Wlad.
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11811
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Fury and the WBC (contains a spoiler of Arreola v Sitverne)

Post by Old bones Ian »

Won a little bit on Stiverne last night, there is always the concern his chin was going to let him down, that early loss in his career still sticks in the memory. But i was impressed with him last night, stuck to his game plan well, and showed a new level of movement and punch output not seen before.

He was really digging in the body shots, nice left hooks downstairs and up again.
Post Reply