Lobeless Hearn

Post Reply
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5516
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Lobeless Hearn

Post by forcefraser »

I had a bunch of mates round for the boxing on Saturday. Top night and a great fight with Froch v Kessler.

However, one astute observer, not a boxing fan to be fair, oted something that I have not noticed before. This mate is from Belarussia and he saw that Eddie Hearn had no visible ear lobes. In his country this means that a man is not to be trusted. "A lobeless man is a fox with cunning, a tricky animal" as he put it.

My experience with lobes and whether they are related to trustworthiness is pretty limited, but there is no denying the fact that Eddie certainly lacks depth in the lobe department.

I have always found Hearn, although slick and wide, to be genuinely interested in his boxers and the sport. This lobe issue has cast a shadow of doubt over proceedings and I am now directionless in my assement of young Hearn.

Do the lobes tell a story? or is it just an old belarussian wives tale?
Parson Cross
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1991
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57

Re: Lobeless Hearn

Post by Parson Cross »

Khan has a bone infection affecting his jaw.
That's why he can't trust taking a shot on it.
Purdy has a cream cake obsession.
Damn these imperfections.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Lobeless Hearn

Post by palooka »

forcefraser wrote:I had a bunch of mates round for the boxing on Saturday. Top night and a great fight with Froch v Kessler.

However, one astute observer, not a boxing fan to be fair, oted something that I have not noticed before. This mate is from Belarussia and he saw that Eddie Hearn had no visible ear lobes. In his country this means that a man is not to be trusted. "A lobeless man is a fox with cunning, a tricky animal" as he put it.

My experience with lobes and whether they are related to trustworthiness is pretty limited, but there is no denying the fact that Eddie certainly lacks depth in the lobe department.

I have always found Hearn, although slick and wide, to be genuinely interested in his boxers and the sport. This lobe issue has cast a shadow of doubt over proceedings and I am now directionless in my assement of young Hearn.

Do the lobes tell a story? or is it just an old belarussian wives tale?
I've no frontal lobe.

If your mate knows all about head shapes etc get him round the next time Valuev boxes and see what he says then.
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5516
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: Lobeless Hearn

Post by forcefraser »

How does one post pictures on here? It is proving beyond my skills.
SNG
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4703
Joined: 22 May 2013, 21:02

Re: Lobeless Hearn

Post by SNG »

It's definitely bollocks.

Image
SNG
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4703
Joined: 22 May 2013, 21:02

Re: Lobeless Hearn

Post by SNG »

palooka wrote: I've no frontal lobe.
That explains so much.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Lobeless Hearn

Post by palooka »

SNG wrote:It's definitely bollocks.

Image
that's not Eddie Hearn pal, though he's much better looking and with his lovely lobes he must be very trustworthy.
SNG
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4703
Joined: 22 May 2013, 21:02

Re: Lobeless Hearn

Post by SNG »

palooka wrote:
SNG wrote:It's definitely bollocks.

Image
that's not Eddie Hearn pal, though he's much better looking and with his lovely lobes he must be very trustworthy.
Er....I know. I was showing that Warren has lobes and isn't particularly trustworthy, so the theory is nonsense.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Lobeless Hearn

Post by palooka »

SNG wrote:
palooka wrote:
SNG wrote:It's definitely bollocks.

Image
that's not Eddie Hearn pal, though he's much better looking and with his lovely lobes he must be very trustworthy.
Er....I know. I was showing that Warren has lobes and isn't particularly trustworthy, so the theory is nonsense.
Ah; so that's what a frontal lobe is for.
chad
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1806
Joined: 22 Sep 2011, 13:52

Re: Lobeless Hearn

Post by chad »

Image

Image

Image

I'd trust Eddie ahead of any of the above well lobed men! Especially if it came to baby sitting.
kevo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6559
Joined: 30 Apr 2003, 14:30

Re: Lobeless Hearn

Post by kevo »

Image
kevo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6559
Joined: 30 Apr 2003, 14:30

Re: Lobeless Hearn

Post by kevo »

Just been discussing the whole earlobe situation on Twitter with Mr Hearn himself. Apparently it's 'all the rage'.
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5516
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: Lobeless Hearn

Post by forcefraser »

kevo wrote:Just been discussing the whole earlobe situation on Twitter with Mr Hearn himself. Apparently it's 'all the rage'.

Good work Kevo. We will get to the bottom of this lobe situation.

I thought about blaming Groves, but on closer inspection I see that Richard "The Secret" Williams is at fault here.
J
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8015
Joined: 17 Feb 2004, 12:39

Re: Lobeless Hearn

Post by J »

do you trust evander holyfield?

he had lobes but they got chewed off..what then?
desperados
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Lobeless Hearn

Post by desperados »

J wrote:do you trust evander holyfield?

he had lobes but they got chewed off..what then?
your ear anatomy is a little off.
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Lobeless Hearn

Post by Final round »

SNG wrote:
palooka wrote:
SNG wrote:It's definitely bollocks.

Image
that's not Eddie Hearn pal, though he's much better looking and with his lovely lobes he must be very trustworthy.
Er....I know. I was showing that Warren has lobes and isn't particularly trustworthy, so the theory is nonsense.
That's lobe'l if I've ever heard it release the legal hounds Wazza
Post Reply