Burns v Raymundo Beltran September

Post Reply
geoffburt07
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 237
Joined: 16 Jul 2010, 09:49

Burns v Raymundo Beltran September

Post by geoffburt07 »

In Glasgow. 90% done deal. Thoughts?
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Burns v Raymundo Beltran September

Post by Final round »

Who?
BigCheese1986
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 617
Joined: 08 Nov 2008, 15:41

Re: Burns v Raymundo Beltran September

Post by BigCheese1986 »

Final round wrote:Who?
^^ This
The Insider
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 2581
Joined: 26 Mar 2012, 11:21

Re: Burns v Raymundo Beltran September

Post by The Insider »

I heard this. Meant to be September 7th. Bit disappointed as I thought Hearn was going to deliver the big unification fights for burns now. Still he's meant to be a live contender so will sit back and see how Ricky does.
Trojans44
Cruiserweight
Posts: 352
Joined: 23 Sep 2010, 14:05

Re: Burns v Raymundo Beltran September

Post by Trojans44 »

I have completely given up on the notion that Ricky Burns has any interest in being a top level fighter.

The worst thing is that his last fight showed he may as well roll the dice against a big money opponent because in his efforts to earn shedloads on a Calzaghe inspired model he nearly lost it all against a total nobody.
johnswan1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3348
Joined: 27 Feb 2005, 18:03

Re: Burns v Raymundo Beltran September

Post by johnswan1 »

Bum of the month.

Eventually one of these guys is going to beat Burns.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Burns v Raymundo Beltran September

Post by whiskey »

Beltran is actually pretty entertaining. He's no Mayweather but he has a lot of heart and has got off the deck to come back and win. Mexican born and bred.

Burn's last outing against Jose Gonzalez - well he was a very slick fighter, far slicker than anyone possibly envisaged going into the bout - and thankfully he faded and quit. It didn't help that Burns was so washed-out going into the event either, having trained for two events that got canned. He looked well beaten until Gonzalez jacked it in and maybe that's why they're working Ricky back into the mix with this guy.

I think the idea must be to get Burns out regularly and back to his best. Stick a good undercard together and price the tickets sensibly given the headliner, and give the Scottish fans a night out - then probably crack on at the end of the year.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Burns v Raymundo Beltran September

Post by lefty »

This is why ive been defending FW somewhat. People keep going on about Hearn being the saviour of british boxing but he likes to protect his fighters just as much as FW in my opinion if not more so! In interviews you see Hearn talking about how much he loves boxing and wants to put on the best fights but the truth is he just wants to line his pockets!
Parson Cross
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1991
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57

Re: Burns v Raymundo Beltran September

Post by Parson Cross »

90% done ......................... so 10% chance it won't happen.
Enough said.
If Wazza had done this he'd get a slaughtering.
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: Burns v Raymundo Beltran September

Post by JimJim2009 »

Trojans44 wrote:I have completely given up on the notion that Ricky Burns has any interest in being a top level fighter.

The worst thing is that his last fight showed he may as well roll the dice against a big money opponent because in his efforts to earn shedloads on a Calzaghe inspired model he nearly lost it all against a total nobody.
x2
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Burns v Raymundo Beltran September

Post by lefty »

G0mez wrote:Beltran is actually pretty entertaining. He's no Mayweather but he has a lot of heart and has got off the deck to come back and win. Mexican born and bred.

Burn's last outing against Jose Gonzalez - well he was a very slick fighter, far slicker than anyone possibly envisaged going into the bout - and thankfully he faded and quit. It didn't help that Burns was so washed-out going into the event either, having trained for two events that got canned. He looked well beaten until Gonzalez jacked it in and maybe that's why they're working Ricky back into the mix with this guy.

I think the idea must be to get Burns out regularly and back to his best. Stick a good undercard together and price the tickets sensibly given the headliner, and give the Scottish fans a night out - then probably crack on at the end of the year.
He's pretty mediocre to be honest. He's lost 6 times and one of those was Bogere who Richard Abril beat not that long ago and he was also knocked out in 4 rounds by Ameth Diaz who Vazquez dominated. Burns is being protected. No two ways about it.
Parson Cross
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1991
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57

Re: Burns v Raymundo Beltran September

Post by Parson Cross »

So why do you think Hearn signed him when he's got the pick of whoever he wants ?
Not disagreeing with you mate but the signing surprised me.
OK he'll sell out on his home turf - but for how long ?
Shirow
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1719
Joined: 29 Nov 2003, 11:15

Re: Burns v Raymundo Beltran September

Post by Shirow »

Ray Beltran is not a bum, solid but definitely not spectacular. He was good enough to beat Hank Lundy.
johnswan1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3348
Joined: 27 Feb 2005, 18:03

Re: Burns v Raymundo Beltran September

Post by johnswan1 »

Whatever happened with Morrison, did the Board take action against him for his Facebook comments about the Muslims?
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23175
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Burns v Raymundo Beltran September

Post by mickey1975 »

G0mez wrote:Beltran is actually pretty entertaining. He's no Mayweather but he has a lot of heart and has got off the deck to come back and win. Mexican born and bred.

Burn's last outing against Jose Gonzalez - well he was a very slick fighter, far slicker than anyone possibly envisaged going into the bout - and thankfully he faded and quit. It didn't help that Burns was so washed-out going into the event either, having trained for two events that got canned. He looked well beaten until Gonzalez jacked it in and maybe that's why they're working Ricky back into the mix with this guy.

I think the idea must be to get Burns out regularly and back to his best. Stick a good undercard together and price the tickets sensibly given the headliner, and give the Scottish fans a night out - then probably crack on at the end of the year.
So, in a roundabout way, it's actually Wazza's fault Eddie is putting on a pretty poor fight?
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Burns v Raymundo Beltran September

Post by lefty »

Parson Cross wrote:So why do you think Hearn signed him when he's got the pick of whoever he wants ?
Not disagreeing with you mate but the signing surprised me.
OK he'll sell out on his home turf - but for how long ?
Who was that aimed at?
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Burns v Raymundo Beltran September

Post by lefty »

Shirow wrote:Ray Beltran is not a bum, solid but definitely not spectacular. He was good enough to beat Hank Lundy.
Yeah but who has Hank Lundy ever beaten?
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Burns v Raymundo Beltran September

Post by lefty »

Id of rather seen Burns in against Antonio Demarco who Hearn kept saying Rees would beat in the build up to his fight with Broner! Put your money where your mouth is! Id pick Demarco to beat Rees and he'd also give Burns a very tough fight.
danconnollyeire
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 3576
Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31

Re: Burns v Raymundo Beltran September

Post by danconnollyeire »

I don't know if the fighters are to blame, the promoters or the promoters confidence in their fighters (I think it's the later)

Eddie will let Froch fight anyone because he's confident that if he doesn't win, he win put up a great fight (alla Ward) and still be a megastar name. Wazza and Hearn must know the others will eventually lose and go off the radar otherwise they'd do the same...

With Chisora and Fury (with Henessey), they have the personalities that even if they lose, they're persona's will still keep them at the top as possible cashcows. Clev and Burns, for example, don't posses the personalities to keep their names in the media if they lose
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Burns v Raymundo Beltran September

Post by lefty »

danconnollyeire wrote:I don't know if the fighters are to blame, the promoters or the promoters confidence in their fighters (I think it's the later)

Eddie will let Froch fight anyone because he's confident that if he doesn't win, he win put up a great fight (alla Ward) and still be a megastar name. Wazza and Hearn must know the others will eventually lose and go off the radar otherwise they'd do the same...

With Chisora and Fury (with Henessey), they have the personalities that even if they lose, they're persona's will still keep them at the top as possible cashcows. Clev and Burns, for example, don't posses the personalities to keep their names in the media if they lose
I have the feeling though that with Hearn its all about making these guys big names in their hometowns and then having them in stadium fights or big arena fights ie Burns and Brook and cashing in on them. However to do that they cant afford to lose, so Hearn will just keep putting them in with relatively soft opposition and cashing in basically.
danconnollyeire
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 3576
Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31

Re: Burns v Raymundo Beltran September

Post by danconnollyeire »

columbo wrote:
danconnollyeire wrote:I don't know if the fighters are to blame, the promoters or the promoters confidence in their fighters (I think it's the later)

Eddie will let Froch fight anyone because he's confident that if he doesn't win, he win put up a great fight (alla Ward) and still be a megastar name. Wazza and Hearn must know the others will eventually lose and go off the radar otherwise they'd do the same...

With Chisora and Fury (with Henessey), they have the personalities that even if they lose, they're persona's will still keep them at the top as possible cashcows. Clev and Burns, for example, don't posses the personalities to keep their names in the media if they lose
I have the feeling though that with Hearn its all about making these guys big names in their hometowns and then having them in stadium fights or big arena fights ie Burns and Brook and cashing in on them. However to do that they cant afford to lose, so Hearn will just keep putting them in with relatively soft opposition and cashing in basically.
True. Some people can be pushed in to stadium fights and others are naturally made for them (Haye, Froch, Fury)
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Burns v Raymundo Beltran September

Post by lefty »

danconnollyeire wrote:
columbo wrote:
danconnollyeire wrote:I don't know if the fighters are to blame, the promoters or the promoters confidence in their fighters (I think it's the later)

Eddie will let Froch fight anyone because he's confident that if he doesn't win, he win put up a great fight (alla Ward) and still be a megastar name. Wazza and Hearn must know the others will eventually lose and go off the radar otherwise they'd do the same...

With Chisora and Fury (with Henessey), they have the personalities that even if they lose, they're persona's will still keep them at the top as possible cashcows. Clev and Burns, for example, don't posses the personalities to keep their names in the media if they lose
I have the feeling though that with Hearn its all about making these guys big names in their hometowns and then having them in stadium fights or big arena fights ie Burns and Brook and cashing in on them. However to do that they cant afford to lose, so Hearn will just keep putting them in with relatively soft opposition and cashing in basically.
True. Some people can be pushed in to stadium fights and others are naturally made for them (Haye, Froch, Fury)
Burns is a guy who also can sell out in Scotland I think because without meaning to insult scottish boxers or fans, there isnt many top scottish boxers currently and Burns is flying the flag really.
rio
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1173
Joined: 22 Oct 2012, 16:48

Re: Burns v Raymundo Beltran September

Post by rio »

Shocker didn't see this burns fighting an absolute nobody in a fight that literally no one cares about. I take it gamboa was busy and any other meaningfull opponent for that matter?
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Burns v Raymundo Beltran September

Post by DMA1987 »

I am a big fan of Eddie, but this isn't supposed to be what he is about and I am a bit disappointed

That being said it is probably wise from his P.O.V to see Burns put a solid performance in, before putting him in with the top names. Get him going into a bigger fight in good form.
billy nelson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1966
Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49

Re: Burns v Raymundo Beltran September

Post by billy nelson »

Colombo England are hardly bursting at the seems with world champ are you?
Post Reply