Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !

lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !

Post by lefty »

DMA1987 wrote:
columbo wrote:
kaiserbill wrote:You have advanced neurosyphilis?

It's all falling into place now. :wink:
Yeah im doomed. My knob is in the final stages of decomposition and also as you state, my brain is also heavily affected :OhYes:
Is that because your knob is on your head?
That's charming that is :lol:
kaiserbill
Cruiserweight
Posts: 355
Joined: 29 Jun 2011, 18:11

Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !

Post by kaiserbill »

I must say though, that it should be a very entertaining fight, whilst it lasts.

The build up should be interesting, in a slow-motion train wreck sort of way.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !

Post by palooka »

DMA1987 wrote:
columbo wrote:
kaiserbill wrote:You have advanced neurosyphilis?

It's all falling into place now. :wink:
Yeah im doomed. My knob is in the final stages of decomposition and also as you state, my brain is also heavily affected :OhYes:
Is that because your knob is on your head?
Quite brilliant :bow:
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !

Post by lefty »

kaiserbill wrote:I must say though, that it should be a very entertaining fight, whilst it lasts.

The build up should be interesting, in a slow-motion train wreck sort of way.
I just think that Fury makes too many mistakes and Haye will capitalise on them.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !

Post by lefty »

DMA1987 wrote:
columbo wrote:
kaiserbill wrote:You have advanced neurosyphilis?

It's all falling into place now. :wink:
Yeah im doomed. My knob is in the final stages of decomposition and also as you state, my brain is also heavily affected :OhYes:
Is that because your knob is on your head?
Quite brilliant :bow:[/quote]

arse kisser ;;-)
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !

Post by palooka »

No, it seemed quick; I've just had a glance through this thread and can't understand all the arguments, missed out big time not being on here 24/7. Nothing personal lefty, just thought it was a good, quick put down/pun.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !

Post by lefty »

palooka wrote:No, it seemed quick; I've just had a glance through this thread and can't understand all the arguments, missed out big time not being on here 24/7. Nothing personal lefty, just thought it was a good, quick put down/pun.
:TU: ...... just a debate/argument regarding Haye when he fought Klitschko haha.
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !

Post by Finn »

kaiserbill wrote:
Finn wrote:
columbo wrote:
Your debate with Finn is just that. However I don't think you need to be quite so condescending and arrogant about it. It gets too personal on here at times.
Yeah i think plenty of us are guilty of that at times on here. However its water of a ducks back i went to uni and im 32.

Dr Bill im fairly sure your argument was that "who are you" was not a sports chant in the UK and that hayes fans were just being disrespectful to wlad at the weigh in - you argued it to the death despite being told by numerous poster it was. Which sport it was is irrelevant - didnt it turn out you arent even british or something? Thats where the whole i play rugby argument came in because you came to england once on a rugby tour? so knew britain. I cant really remember its was years ago.
Finn, my thrust was that it was a distasteful chant, used by certain elements.
It has never been used by any rugby crowd for just those reasons.
Rather be complimentary to the opposition, as it does reflect on your team/champion that the opposition have the guts to be there to compete. Their best efforts reflect upon your own teams/champions efforts, particularly if you end up victorious.

I'm quite aware it is used in certain sports. Doesn't mean I like it, nor that it has always been used in the past.
Travelling widely, I can honestly say that, apart from football fans in other nations, it is almost unheard of by foreign fans of other sports, particularly at something as innocuous as a weigh in.
It's why it is looked down upon with bewilderment when it happens overseas by the travelling fans at things such as the weigh in.

I may or may not be originally British.... it hardly matters now in any event at this point in my life.
I've lived for various parts of my life in London, Ely, Cornwall, Preston, and Bristol.

It was years ago, so perhaps we should just agree to disagree.
Thats right i remember now thats why i posted the video of families, Japanese tourists and children chanting who are ya at a 70,000 capacity stadium explaining to you that its not a vindictive chant only used by hooligans and its tradition to shout down the other team in the UK. Then you got on your high horse trying to explain to me about british fans because you came here before.

Regardless you've crossed the line Bill, you are now my arch enemy; im only 14 and im still reading ben and spot books at school. Your insults have cut hard and deep i will never forgive or forget. I may self harm tonight.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !

Post by lefty »

kaiserbill wrote:
Finn wrote:
columbo wrote:
Your debate with Finn is just that. However I don't think you need to be quite so condescending and arrogant about it. It gets too personal on here at times.
Yeah i think plenty of us are guilty of that at times on here. However its water of a ducks back i went to uni and im 32.

Dr Bill im fairly sure your argument was that "who are you" was not a sports chant in the UK and that hayes fans were just being disrespectful to wlad at the weigh in - you argued it to the death despite being told by numerous poster it was. Which sport it was is irrelevant - didnt it turn out you arent even british or something? Thats where the whole i play rugby argument came in because you came to england once on a rugby tour? so knew britain. I cant really remember its was years ago.
Finn, my thrust was that it was a distasteful chant, used by certain elements.
It has never been used by any rugby crowd for just those reasons.
Rather be complimentary to the opposition, as it does reflect on your team/champion that the opposition have the guts to be there to compete. Their best efforts reflect upon your own teams/champions efforts, particularly if you end up victorious.

I'm quite aware it is used in certain sports. Doesn't mean I like it, nor that it has always been used in the past.
Travelling widely, I can honestly say that, apart from football fans in other nations, it is almost unheard of by foreign fans of other sports, particularly at something as innocuous as a weigh in.
It's why it is looked down upon with bewilderment when it happens overseas by the travelling fans at things such as the weigh in.

I may or may not be originally British.... it hardly matters now in any event at this point in my life.
I've lived for various parts of my life in London, Ely, Cornwall, Preston, and Bristol.

It was years ago, so perhaps we should just agree to disagree.
Thats right i remember now thats why i posted the video of families, Japanese tourists and children chanting who are ya at a 70,000 capacity stadium explaining to you that its not a vindictive chant only used by hooligans and its tradition to shout down the other team in the UK. Then you got on your high horse trying to explain to me about british fans because you came here before.

Regardless you've crossed the line Bill, you are now my arch enemy; im only 14 and im still reading ben and spot books at school. Your insults have cut hard and deep i will never forgive or forget. I may self harm tonight.[/quote]

Need the number of the samaritans?
Crazyboy
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1246
Joined: 12 Nov 2010, 11:56

Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !

Post by Crazyboy »

DMA1987 wrote:
kaiserbill wrote:
DMA1987 wrote:Stop being so personal Bill you condescending tosser.
I fear the irony in your own post is obviously completely unintentional, and thus lost on you.

It's like a bad Ben Stiller comedy.
What's irony? Is that a medical thing?
nah its that thing the missus uses sometimes....i think its called that anyway
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !

Post by Finn »

columbo wrote:
Need the number of the samaritans?
Are they still going? :lol:
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !

Post by Final round »

Have we found out 'The Facts' yet ?
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !

Post by DMA1987 »

Crazyboy wrote:
DMA1987 wrote:
kaiserbill wrote:
I fear the irony in your own post is obviously completely unintentional, and thus lost on you.

It's like a bad Ben Stiller comedy.
What's irony? Is that a medical thing?
nah its that thing the missus uses sometimes....i think its called that anyway
:lol: :TU:
lillywhite14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !

Post by lillywhite14 »

Surely you lovebirds can continue this flirting via pm? :wink:
damianhucker1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3071
Joined: 20 Sep 2008, 17:36

Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !

Post by damianhucker1 »

The FACT is ... That Fury has just written on his facebook page .....

"FIGHTS ON!!! FURY VS HAYE

Sep 28th manchester!!! "
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !

Post by palooka »

palooka wrote:I talked to Tysons' father in law this morning and he was under the impression that the Haye bout had been agreed, signed for in September.

Told you so :salut:
damianhucker1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3071
Joined: 20 Sep 2008, 17:36

Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !

Post by damianhucker1 »

Press conference 11th July .
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !

Post by palooka »

damianhucker1 wrote:Press conference 11th July .
That might be lively.
damianhucker1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3071
Joined: 20 Sep 2008, 17:36

Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !

Post by damianhucker1 »

palooka wrote:
damianhucker1 wrote:Press conference 11th July .
That might be lively.

Dont think theyll need to be seperated by a metal fence but the banter should certainly be interesting .
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !

Post by palooka »

damianhucker1 wrote:
palooka wrote:
damianhucker1 wrote:Press conference 11th July .
That might be lively.

Dont think theyll need to be seperated by a metal fence but the banter should certainly be interesting .
Might have to put Tyson in a straight jacket though :OhYes:
Teddy's Toupee
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2903
Joined: 25 Sep 2010, 17:37

Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !

Post by Teddy's Toupee »

kaiserbill wrote:
Teddy's Toupee wrote:Did the Holocaust happen, kaiserbill?
What a bizarre post.

Of course it did.
Just wondering with all your talk of re-written history and revisionism, kaiser.
rhino222
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6618
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 09:38

Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !

Post by rhino222 »

my opinion is to always be aware of a fighter that likes to fight. adam booth is a shrewd customer and he knows fury likes to fight and he knows fury is dangerous. haye will have to knock fury down more than once to win, maybe 3 or 4 times.

but......does fury have the power to trouble haye ???....(well...monte barratt did and fury is better than him!!)... I think fury can beat haye, but he has to land, that's where the issue is, haye is fast and very very powerful. fury is ok speed wise but not lightening quick. who will land first?.....and often enough.
MarkMcBurney
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1670
Joined: 18 Nov 2012, 07:47

Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !

Post by MarkMcBurney »

If Wladimir Klitschko couldn't knock David Haye down/out I'd suggest Tyson Fury might struggle.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23189
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !

Post by mickey1975 »

MarkMcBurney wrote:If Wladimir Klitschko couldn't knock David Haye down/out I'd suggest Tyson Fury might struggle.
I suspect Haye might not fight like he is terrified against Fury and leave himself a bit more open to shots.
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !

Post by DMA1987 »

rhino222 wrote:my opinion is to always be aware of a fighter that likes to fight. adam booth is a shrewd customer and he knows fury likes to fight and he knows fury is dangerous. haye will have to knock fury down more than once to win, maybe 3 or 4 times.

but......does fury have the power to trouble haye ???....(well...monte barratt did and fury is better than him!!)... I think fury can beat haye, but he has to land, that's where the issue is, haye is fast and very very powerful. fury is ok speed wise but not lightening quick. who will land first?.....and often enough.
You reckon? Cunningham put him down, I'm sure Haye would make him stay that way.
Post Reply