That's charming that isDMA1987 wrote:Is that because your knob is on your head?columbo wrote:Yeah im doomed. My knob is in the final stages of decomposition and also as you state, my brain is also heavily affectedkaiserbill wrote:You have advanced neurosyphilis?
It's all falling into place now.
Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
-
kaiserbill
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 355
- Joined: 29 Jun 2011, 18:11
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
I must say though, that it should be a very entertaining fight, whilst it lasts.
The build up should be interesting, in a slow-motion train wreck sort of way.
The build up should be interesting, in a slow-motion train wreck sort of way.
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
Quite brilliantDMA1987 wrote:Is that because your knob is on your head?columbo wrote:Yeah im doomed. My knob is in the final stages of decomposition and also as you state, my brain is also heavily affectedkaiserbill wrote:You have advanced neurosyphilis?
It's all falling into place now.
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
I just think that Fury makes too many mistakes and Haye will capitalise on them.kaiserbill wrote:I must say though, that it should be a very entertaining fight, whilst it lasts.
The build up should be interesting, in a slow-motion train wreck sort of way.
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
Quite brilliantDMA1987 wrote:Is that because your knob is on your head?columbo wrote:Yeah im doomed. My knob is in the final stages of decomposition and also as you state, my brain is also heavily affectedkaiserbill wrote:You have advanced neurosyphilis?
It's all falling into place now.
arse kisser ;;-)
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
No, it seemed quick; I've just had a glance through this thread and can't understand all the arguments, missed out big time not being on here 24/7. Nothing personal lefty, just thought it was a good, quick put down/pun.
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
palooka wrote:No, it seemed quick; I've just had a glance through this thread and can't understand all the arguments, missed out big time not being on here 24/7. Nothing personal lefty, just thought it was a good, quick put down/pun.
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
Thats right i remember now thats why i posted the video of families, Japanese tourists and children chanting who are ya at a 70,000 capacity stadium explaining to you that its not a vindictive chant only used by hooligans and its tradition to shout down the other team in the UK. Then you got on your high horse trying to explain to me about british fans because you came here before.kaiserbill wrote:Finn, my thrust was that it was a distasteful chant, used by certain elements.Finn wrote:Yeah i think plenty of us are guilty of that at times on here. However its water of a ducks back i went to uni and im 32.columbo wrote:
Your debate with Finn is just that. However I don't think you need to be quite so condescending and arrogant about it. It gets too personal on here at times.
Dr Bill im fairly sure your argument was that "who are you" was not a sports chant in the UK and that hayes fans were just being disrespectful to wlad at the weigh in - you argued it to the death despite being told by numerous poster it was. Which sport it was is irrelevant - didnt it turn out you arent even british or something? Thats where the whole i play rugby argument came in because you came to england once on a rugby tour? so knew britain. I cant really remember its was years ago.
It has never been used by any rugby crowd for just those reasons.
Rather be complimentary to the opposition, as it does reflect on your team/champion that the opposition have the guts to be there to compete. Their best efforts reflect upon your own teams/champions efforts, particularly if you end up victorious.
I'm quite aware it is used in certain sports. Doesn't mean I like it, nor that it has always been used in the past.
Travelling widely, I can honestly say that, apart from football fans in other nations, it is almost unheard of by foreign fans of other sports, particularly at something as innocuous as a weigh in.
It's why it is looked down upon with bewilderment when it happens overseas by the travelling fans at things such as the weigh in.
I may or may not be originally British.... it hardly matters now in any event at this point in my life.
I've lived for various parts of my life in London, Ely, Cornwall, Preston, and Bristol.
It was years ago, so perhaps we should just agree to disagree.
Regardless you've crossed the line Bill, you are now my arch enemy; im only 14 and im still reading ben and spot books at school. Your insults have cut hard and deep i will never forgive or forget. I may self harm tonight.
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
Thats right i remember now thats why i posted the video of families, Japanese tourists and children chanting who are ya at a 70,000 capacity stadium explaining to you that its not a vindictive chant only used by hooligans and its tradition to shout down the other team in the UK. Then you got on your high horse trying to explain to me about british fans because you came here before.kaiserbill wrote:Finn, my thrust was that it was a distasteful chant, used by certain elements.Finn wrote:Yeah i think plenty of us are guilty of that at times on here. However its water of a ducks back i went to uni and im 32.columbo wrote:
Your debate with Finn is just that. However I don't think you need to be quite so condescending and arrogant about it. It gets too personal on here at times.
Dr Bill im fairly sure your argument was that "who are you" was not a sports chant in the UK and that hayes fans were just being disrespectful to wlad at the weigh in - you argued it to the death despite being told by numerous poster it was. Which sport it was is irrelevant - didnt it turn out you arent even british or something? Thats where the whole i play rugby argument came in because you came to england once on a rugby tour? so knew britain. I cant really remember its was years ago.
It has never been used by any rugby crowd for just those reasons.
Rather be complimentary to the opposition, as it does reflect on your team/champion that the opposition have the guts to be there to compete. Their best efforts reflect upon your own teams/champions efforts, particularly if you end up victorious.
I'm quite aware it is used in certain sports. Doesn't mean I like it, nor that it has always been used in the past.
Travelling widely, I can honestly say that, apart from football fans in other nations, it is almost unheard of by foreign fans of other sports, particularly at something as innocuous as a weigh in.
It's why it is looked down upon with bewilderment when it happens overseas by the travelling fans at things such as the weigh in.
I may or may not be originally British.... it hardly matters now in any event at this point in my life.
I've lived for various parts of my life in London, Ely, Cornwall, Preston, and Bristol.
It was years ago, so perhaps we should just agree to disagree.
Regardless you've crossed the line Bill, you are now my arch enemy; im only 14 and im still reading ben and spot books at school. Your insults have cut hard and deep i will never forgive or forget. I may self harm tonight.[/quote]
Need the number of the samaritans?
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
nah its that thing the missus uses sometimes....i think its called that anywayDMA1987 wrote:What's irony? Is that a medical thing?kaiserbill wrote:I fear the irony in your own post is obviously completely unintentional, and thus lost on you.DMA1987 wrote:Stop being so personal Bill you condescending tosser.
It's like a bad Ben Stiller comedy.
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
Are they still going?columbo wrote:
Need the number of the samaritans?
-
Final round
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
Have we found out 'The Facts' yet ?
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
Crazyboy wrote:nah its that thing the missus uses sometimes....i think its called that anywayDMA1987 wrote:What's irony? Is that a medical thing?kaiserbill wrote:
I fear the irony in your own post is obviously completely unintentional, and thus lost on you.
It's like a bad Ben Stiller comedy.
-
lillywhite14
- Heavyweight

Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
Surely you lovebirds can continue this flirting via pm? 
-
damianhucker1
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3071
- Joined: 20 Sep 2008, 17:36
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
The FACT is ... That Fury has just written on his facebook page .....
"FIGHTS ON!!! FURY VS HAYE
Sep 28th manchester!!! "
"FIGHTS ON!!! FURY VS HAYE
Sep 28th manchester!!! "
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
palooka wrote:I talked to Tysons' father in law this morning and he was under the impression that the Haye bout had been agreed, signed for in September.
Told you so
-
damianhucker1
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3071
- Joined: 20 Sep 2008, 17:36
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
Press conference 11th July .
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
That might be lively.damianhucker1 wrote:Press conference 11th July .
-
damianhucker1
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3071
- Joined: 20 Sep 2008, 17:36
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
palooka wrote:That might be lively.damianhucker1 wrote:Press conference 11th July .
Dont think theyll need to be seperated by a metal fence but the banter should certainly be interesting .
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
Might have to put Tyson in a straight jacket thoughdamianhucker1 wrote:palooka wrote:That might be lively.damianhucker1 wrote:Press conference 11th July .
Dont think theyll need to be seperated by a metal fence but the banter should certainly be interesting .
-
Teddy's Toupee
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 2903
- Joined: 25 Sep 2010, 17:37
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
Just wondering with all your talk of re-written history and revisionism, kaiser.kaiserbill wrote:What a bizarre post.Teddy's Toupee wrote:Did the Holocaust happen, kaiserbill?
Of course it did.
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
my opinion is to always be aware of a fighter that likes to fight. adam booth is a shrewd customer and he knows fury likes to fight and he knows fury is dangerous. haye will have to knock fury down more than once to win, maybe 3 or 4 times.
but......does fury have the power to trouble haye ???....(well...monte barratt did and fury is better than him!!)... I think fury can beat haye, but he has to land, that's where the issue is, haye is fast and very very powerful. fury is ok speed wise but not lightening quick. who will land first?.....and often enough.
but......does fury have the power to trouble haye ???....(well...monte barratt did and fury is better than him!!)... I think fury can beat haye, but he has to land, that's where the issue is, haye is fast and very very powerful. fury is ok speed wise but not lightening quick. who will land first?.....and often enough.
-
MarkMcBurney
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: 18 Nov 2012, 07:47
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
If Wladimir Klitschko couldn't knock David Haye down/out I'd suggest Tyson Fury might struggle.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23188
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
I suspect Haye might not fight like he is terrified against Fury and leave himself a bit more open to shots.MarkMcBurney wrote:If Wladimir Klitschko couldn't knock David Haye down/out I'd suggest Tyson Fury might struggle.
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
You reckon? Cunningham put him down, I'm sure Haye would make him stay that way.rhino222 wrote:my opinion is to always be aware of a fighter that likes to fight. adam booth is a shrewd customer and he knows fury likes to fight and he knows fury is dangerous. haye will have to knock fury down more than once to win, maybe 3 or 4 times.
but......does fury have the power to trouble haye ???....(well...monte barratt did and fury is better than him!!)... I think fury can beat haye, but he has to land, that's where the issue is, haye is fast and very very powerful. fury is ok speed wise but not lightening quick. who will land first?.....and often enough.