Has allegedly threatened ifilm London with legal action

junior pepa seed
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 448
Joined: 16 Dec 2008, 12:36

Has allegedly threatened ifilm London with legal action

Post by junior pepa seed »

Dunno if you saw their last video with barry Hearn but there was some allegedly questions and answers in there, now video is removed and kugans tweeted due to legal reasons its gone.


Kugan Cassius iFILM @KuganCassius 11m
Unfortunately we have had to remove our latest video on the channel due to the threat of legal proceedings against us. #boxing
View details ·


Kugan Cassius iFILM @KuganCassius 10m
Myself and James are unable to make any further comment on this, but will do in due course if necessary. Thank you.
View details ·



“@KuganCassius: Unfortunately we have had to remove our latest video on the channel due to threat of legal proceedings against us” laughable
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Has allegedly threatened ifilm London with legal action

Post by lefty »

The tweets in question....


Kugan Cassius iFILM ‏@KuganCassius 12m
Unfortunately we have had to remove our latest video on the channel due to the threat of legal proceedings against us. #boxing


Kugan Cassius iFILM ‏@KuganCassius 11m
Myself and James are unable to make any further comment on this, but will do in due course if necessary. Thank you.

Kugan Cassius iFILM ‏@KuganCassius 7m
Myself and James pride our work on credibility, impartiality and honesty. Today we were put in a position which makes US question this.
junior pepa seed
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 448
Joined: 16 Dec 2008, 12:36

Re: Has allegedly threatened ifilm London with legal action

Post by junior pepa seed »

Crazy ..
Newport Daz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 687
Joined: 31 Aug 2010, 07:26

Re: Has allegedly threatened ifilm London with legal action

Post by Newport Daz »

There's an interview in this month's BN with W@rren and he does come across as both thin skinned and ruthless. A guy wrote something on an internet site W@rren didn;t like and despite the guy telling W@rren he was sorry and skint, W@rren still wants to literally bankrupt him.
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Has allegedly threatened ifilm London with legal action

Post by DMA1987 »

The bloke who has threatened legal action is a joke. They need to tell him to fornicate off. Cant throw his weight around when he hears something he doesn't like. Especially as that is all it is, a threat - he would never be successful. He just picks on those weaker than him.

Its obvious who HE is btw.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Has allegedly threatened ifilm London with legal action

Post by lefty »

Im guessing the argument from FW side if it is him of course is that I think someone said that Barry had stated that FW's business is in ruins? If that isnt true that is probably slanderous and could affect his business in terms of fighters wanting to join his stable...... I doubt it's Kugan and James that the issue is with. It's just their video.
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Has allegedly threatened ifilm London with legal action

Post by DMA1987 »

columbo wrote:Im guessing the argument from FW side if it is him of course is that I think someone said that Barry had stated that FW's business is in ruins? If that isnt true that is probably slanderous and could affect his business in terms of fighters wanting to join his stable...... I doubt it's Kugan and James that the issue is with. It's just their video.
I have a feeling Barry Hearn is very very familiar with the accounts of FW. I doubt he would have said something about his business if it weren't true, especially with FW's track record of legal action.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Has allegedly threatened ifilm London with legal action

Post by lefty »

DMA1987 wrote:
columbo wrote:Im guessing the argument from FW side if it is him of course is that I think someone said that Barry had stated that FW's business is in ruins? If that isnt true that is probably slanderous and could affect his business in terms of fighters wanting to join his stable...... I doubt it's Kugan and James that the issue is with. It's just their video.
I have a feeling Barry Hearn is very very familiar with the accounts of FW. I doubt he would have said something about his business if it weren't true, especially with FW's track record of legal action.
Im not saying he's wrong as I dont know either way. Im just saying I imagine that's what the core of the legal threat is.
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Has allegedly threatened ifilm London with legal action

Post by DMA1987 »

columbo wrote:
DMA1987 wrote:
columbo wrote:Im guessing the argument from FW side if it is him of course is that I think someone said that Barry had stated that FW's business is in ruins? If that isnt true that is probably slanderous and could affect his business in terms of fighters wanting to join his stable...... I doubt it's Kugan and James that the issue is with. It's just their video.
I have a feeling Barry Hearn is very very familiar with the accounts of FW. I doubt he would have said something about his business if it weren't true, especially with FW's track record of legal action.
Im not saying he's wrong as I dont know either way. Im just saying I imagine that's what the core of the legal threat is.
Oh right, yeah no doubt. Will be embarrassing for Fr@nk.
rio
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1173
Joined: 22 Oct 2012, 16:48

Re: Has allegedly threatened ifilm London with legal action

Post by rio »

DMA1987 wrote:
columbo wrote:Im guessing the argument from FW side if it is him of course is that I think someone said that Barry had stated that FW's business is in ruins? If that isnt true that is probably slanderous and could affect his business in terms of fighters wanting to join his stable...... I doubt it's Kugan and James that the issue is with. It's just their video.
I have a feeling Barry Hearn is very very familiar with the accounts of FW. I doubt he would have said something about his business if it weren't true, especially with FW's track record of legal action.[/quote

Isnt it public knowledge that allegedly and sports network is in the red? Im sure i seen a press release somewhere. All this does is make the hardcore fan like warren even less going after kuggs like this. You carnt imagine hearn doing the same thing
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Has allegedly threatened ifilm London with legal action

Post by lefty »

columbo wrote:
DMA1987 wrote:
columbo wrote:Im guessing the argument from FW side if it is him of course is that I think someone said that Barry had stated that FW's business is in ruins? If that isnt true that is probably slanderous and could affect his business in terms of fighters wanting to join his stable...... I doubt it's Kugan and James that the issue is with. It's just their video.
I have a feeling Barry Hearn is very very familiar with the accounts of FW. I doubt he would have said something about his business if it weren't true, especially with FW's track record of legal action.
Im not saying he's wrong as I dont know either way. Im just saying I imagine that's what the core of the legal threat is.
Oh right, yeah no doubt. Will be embarrassing for Fr@nk.[/quote]

It's entertaining to watch though! Haha. I hope FW doesnt ban Ifilm from his shows though as firstly you want to see interviews from as many shows as possible and secondly it's not going to benefit them banning a youtube channel that has a big boxing fanbase.
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Has allegedly threatened ifilm London with legal action

Post by DMA1987 »

rio wrote:
Isnt it public knowledge that Allegedly channel and sports network is in the red? Im sure i seen a press release somewhere. All this does is make the hardcore fan like warren even less going after kuggs like this. You carnt imagine hearn doing the same thing
Absolutely, it will all be available at companies house won't it.

And no you're right they wouldn't. Frank is old school, he tries to bully his way through, clearly doesn't give a fornicate about public image.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23188
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Has allegedly threatened ifilm London with legal action

Post by mickey1975 »

As he stated in BM, no one mentions his new company, w promotions, made 2.5million last year. He will be ok. Bet he's well up for the BJS fight! (And Liam Smith).
MarkMcBurney
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1670
Joined: 18 Nov 2012, 07:47

Re: Has allegedly threatened ifilm London with legal action

Post by MarkMcBurney »

So W Promotions made £2.5m? Maybe he can pay Calzaghe the £1.8m he still owes him then?
BillyTKid
Cruiserweight
Posts: 401
Joined: 08 Sep 2010, 13:19

Re: Has allegedly threatened ifilm London with legal action

Post by BillyTKid »

I'm sure I heard that the owner of rainham steel had bought half of BN.
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: Has allegedly threatened ifilm London with legal action

Post by JimJim2009 »

The topic question is "has allegedly threatened ifilm london with legal action ?"

Without knowing any insider details about this at all, the law of averages suggests that the answer to the question is yes
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Has allegedly threatened ifilm London with legal action

Post by Final round »

When two tribes go to war a point is all that you can score.
mullenman
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1124
Joined: 23 Oct 2012, 11:10

Re: Has allegedly threatened ifilm London with legal action

Post by mullenman »

kugan and james do go work
i hope this does not restrict them in the job that they do
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Has allegedly threatened ifilm London with legal action

Post by lefty »

MachoMan09 wrote:.
Shit yourself there i see ;;-) :lol:
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Has allegedly threatened ifilm London with legal action

Post by lefty »

MachoMan09 wrote:
columbo wrote:
MachoMan09 wrote:.
poo yourself there i see ;;-) :lol:
No. I decided it was a cheap shot.
Haha fairplay.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23188
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Has allegedly threatened ifilm London with legal action

Post by mickey1975 »

MarkMcBurney wrote:So W Promotions made £2.5m? Maybe he can pay Calzaghe the £1.8m he still owes him then?
W Promotions doesn't owe Joe money.
damianhucker1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3071
Joined: 20 Sep 2008, 17:36

Re: Has allegedly threatened ifilm London with legal action

Post by damianhucker1 »

mickey1975 wrote:
MarkMcBurney wrote:So W Promotions made £2.5m? Maybe he can pay Calzaghe the £1.8m he still owes him then?
W Promotions doesn't owe Joe money.
No it was Sports Network wasnt it ? Im guessing the New company is free of any previous companies debts , Unless im completely off the mark and it is all now resolved ???
MarkMcBurney
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1670
Joined: 18 Nov 2012, 07:47

Re: Has allegedly threatened ifilm London with legal action

Post by MarkMcBurney »

damianhucker1 wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:
MarkMcBurney wrote:So W Promotions made £2.5m? Maybe he can pay Calzaghe the £1.8m he still owes him then?
W Promotions doesn't owe Joe money.
No it was Sports Network wasnt it ? Im guessing the New company is free of any previous companies debts , Unless im completely off the mark and it is all now resolved ???
Of course. Old company goes bust owing millions, directors set up new company with a different name doing the same business with mostly the same people...

Frank W@rren is morally bankrupt, if not financially.
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Has allegedly threatened ifilm London with legal action

Post by DMA1987 »

MarkMcBurney wrote:
Of course. Old company goes bust owing millions, directors set up new company with a different name doing the same business with mostly the same people...

Frank W@rren is morally bankrupt, if not financially.
For the things he has done, and the way he has conducted his business he gets an extremely easy ride from most.
MarkMcBurney
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1670
Joined: 18 Nov 2012, 07:47

Re: Has allegedly threatened ifilm London with legal action

Post by MarkMcBurney »

DMA1987 wrote:
MarkMcBurney wrote:
Of course. Old company goes bust owing millions, directors set up new company with a different name doing the same business with mostly the same people...

Frank W@rren is morally bankrupt, if not financially.
For the things he has done, and the way he has conducted his business he gets an extremely easy ride from most.
I agree. As a child of the 80's I'll always be grateful to Frank for some brilliant nights in front of ITV involving people like Benn, Eubank, Collins & Bruno; but things like that always leave a bit of a sour taste, especially give that, love them or hate them, Matchroom have done it the 'right way' and are a bloody successful company. Granted, as Barry says, that's not all down to Boxing but you've got to admire their success.
Locked