Chisora 4/1 KO

CARLING
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 47
Joined: 25 Apr 2009, 08:11

Re: Chisora 4/1 KO

Post by CARLING »

handsofstone wrote:,a proffesional boxer should know you have to be on your feet by 8,rules is rules,its not the refs fault


3.33 If a Boxer is “down” he must regain his feet unassisted within ten seconds. The Referee shall not permit a Boxer to continue boxing, if in his opinion he is able to do so, until the expiration of 8 seconds following the knock down.

the count is 10 not 8. Scott beat the count and was in a position to continue. the ref fucked up.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23243
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Chisora 4/1 KO

Post by handsofstone »

squared circle wrote:Correct. Phil Edwards enforced the rules correctly, to the letter of the law.

However, the issue is whether he should have shown common sense on such a marginal call and let a fighter who appeared unhurt and was winning the fight carry on.
Yeah a lot of referees would have let it continue especially in the States,if it was a young British fighter having his 1st world title attempt abroad and the odds were stacked against him and he was in a very close fight which he would go on to lose on points,if somehow the same thing happened(Brit boxer knocked down champ) only this time the ref allowed the fight to continue then you would imagine the british fighter and his camp would be upset that the ref allowed the bout to go on
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23243
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Chisora 4/1 KO

Post by handsofstone »

CARLING wrote:
handsofstone wrote:,a proffesional boxer should know you have to be on your feet by 8,rules is rules,its not the refs fault


3.33 If a Boxer is “down” he must regain his feet unassisted within ten seconds. The Referee shall not permit a Boxer to continue boxing, if in his opinion he is able to do so, until the expiration of 8 seconds following the knock down.

the count is 10 not 8. Scott beat the count and was in a position to continue. the ref fucked up.
:TU: I always thought the fighter had to be up by 8,ah well you live,you learn
CARLING
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 47
Joined: 25 Apr 2009, 08:11

Re: Chisora 4/1 KO

Post by CARLING »

squared circle wrote: Phil Edwards enforced the rules correctly, to the letter of the law.
Like fornicate he did.
kaiserbill
Cruiserweight
Posts: 355
Joined: 29 Jun 2011, 18:11

Re: Chisora 4/1 KO

Post by kaiserbill »

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12TDyPaYs60

Full fight.

The plethora of warnings against Scott whilst Chisora got not a single warning for multiple similar infringements suggests ref Phil Edwards was always going to count him out whatever number he rose at.

Loaded deck, this was.
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Chisora 4/1 KO

Post by Final round »

MachoMan09 wrote:
The difference is, in the States if you appear to have your wits about you and you start to get up at nine, they generally let you box on e.g. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=imZaiGJgbsw.
I'm sure you could have found a fight from this country where they boxed on after nine or vice a versa over there it's not something that happens in every fight so why should Scott have been aware of any differences.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Chisora 4/1 KO

Post by palooka »

kaiserbill wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12TDyPaYs60

Full fight.

The plethora of warnings against Scott whilst Chisora got not a single warning for multiple similar infringements suggests ref Phil Edwards was always going to count him out whatever number he rose at.

Loaded deck, this was.
I can appreciate you feel strongly and I have seen boxers who when dropped heavily have pounded the ring floor in anger and frustration and listened to the count and stood at 8 and continued. Scott was doing very well in the bout and it was the first time he'd been caught hard to the head and he was far too casual about being down, smiling etc. The ref wasn't 'in the mobs pocket', it wasn't a fix; Scott ballsed up and he will feel awful about it today. I hope they rematch on the next big show AND it's over 12, so no excuses.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23243
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Chisora 4/1 KO

Post by handsofstone »

I suspect the Americans were less than impressed with last nights stoppage,another unbeaten HW bites the dust,Scott played a big part in orchastrating his own downfall
WelshJack
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1332
Joined: 29 Mar 2013, 13:43

Re: Chisora 4/1 KO

Post by WelshJack »

handsofstone wrote:I suspect the Americans were less than impressed with last nights stoppage,another unbeaten HW bites the dust,Scott played a big part in orchastrating his own downfall
Exactly, Scott is a talent but he showed no intention of getting up.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Chisora 4/1 KO

Post by palooka »

WelshJack wrote:
handsofstone wrote:I suspect the Americans were less than impressed with last nights stoppage,another unbeaten HW bites the dust,Scott played a big part in orchastrating his own downfall
Exactly, Scott is a talent but he showed no intention of getting up.
I didn't know whether to watch him or read him (apologies to Cape Fear)
CARLING
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 47
Joined: 25 Apr 2009, 08:11

Re: Chisora 4/1 KO

Post by CARLING »

WelshJack wrote:
handsofstone wrote:I suspect the Americans were less than impressed with last nights stoppage,another unbeaten HW bites the dust,Scott played a big part in orchastrating his own downfall
Exactly, Scott is a talent but he showed no intention of getting up.
He got up! He beat the count! Could he have got up earlier? Yes he could. Did he want to box on? Who knows, probably not. The fact that he beat the count and was not on queer street means is was a dodgy stoppage.
Post Reply