Wrists wrote:Am I reading this thread correctly?
Did people actually say Chisora stood a chance against Wlad...!!!???
Dear lord...............
I've read it all now
It's easier to see a case for Chisora when exaggerating and focusing only on aspects (e.g. qualities, performances, and opponents) that are somewhat favorable to him, while ignoring those seemingly in Wlad's favor.
It's also easier when acting as if Vitali and Wlad are the same fighter, without significant differences in speed, power, footwork, or style; then Chisora must have a great shot against Wlad, as he won a few rounds against Vitali!
What relevance are a bunch of fat old bums to Del Boy? Okay Haye bombed Chisora but styles make fights. Chisora is better than all these guys except Haye, who didn't try
Del Boy's about as fat as any of Wlad's recent opponents, and I don't think he clearly surpasses most of them in ability. Moreover, for all the criticism of Wlad's opponents, his resume is much stronger than Chisora's is, though certain posters seem to highlight flaws only in the former and act as if they strongly support a case for a Chisora win. Can you imagine what those posters would say about Wlad if his best win were over Malik Scott in a fight he was arguably losing; his second best win were arguably over against Sam Sexton; he recently lost widely to an opponent with 14 bouts whose best opponent was John McDermott; and he lost every round prior to being stopped by someone Chisora beat 11-1, 10-2, and 9-3?
I think Haye tried plenty against Wlad, but found it very difficult to land effective blows against a superior heavyweight. If you haven't noticed, Haye tends to fight economically on the back foot, so him fighting that way against Wlad doesn't mean he didn't try.
Going by forum commentary, it would seem the better a fighter gets, the less their opponents try. I suspect that's an illusory correlation stemming from the ability of one fighter impairing the other fighter, making them
look poor and lacking in effort when they aren't.