Burns undercard

geoffburt07
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 237
Joined: 16 Jul 2010, 09:49

Burns undercard

Post by geoffburt07 »

Same home fighters as last time but any word on titles fights or opponents?
geoffburt07
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 237
Joined: 16 Jul 2010, 09:49

Re: Burns undercard

Post by geoffburt07 »

Think Slowey is boxing for title, as is Simmons and Simpson at feather. Dunno about Cardle.
SMASHING
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 176
Joined: 09 Apr 2012, 15:01

Re: Burns undercard

Post by SMASHING »

geoffburt07 wrote:Think Slowey is boxing for title, as is Simmons and Simpson at feather. Dunno about Cardle.

Slowey fighting for a celtic title
http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/sport/box ... n.21768315
geoffburt07
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 237
Joined: 16 Jul 2010, 09:49

Re: Burns undercard

Post by geoffburt07 »

Unnamed opponent? Not too many too chose from. Simmons and Simpson going for titles too. Waiting to see undercard lineup before getting ticks
billy nelson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1966
Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49

Re: Burns undercard

Post by billy nelson »

geoffburt07 wrote:Unnamed opponent? Not too many too chose from. Simmons and Simpson going for titles too. Waiting to see undercard lineup before getting ticks
The main fight is worth the entry fee alone let alone another 3 title fight plus Luke Campbell and Scotty Cardle,David Brophy what is there to think about?
geoffburt07
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 237
Joined: 16 Jul 2010, 09:49

Re: Burns undercard

Post by geoffburt07 »

If any fights are well matched. I don't want to take holidays off work to go to a show that's a complete shutout for all home fighters with no excitement. Surely you know some away boxers?
daviddee
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1574
Joined: 01 Feb 2012, 14:32

Re: Burns undercard

Post by daviddee »

Celtic title would think they will be looking for someone like Dai Davies for Slowey. Hope I'm wrong on that one. What's the chance of Brophy v Boulden rematch?? I think apart from Ricky's fight the rest will be very easy fights too call!!
billy nelson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1966
Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49

Re: Burns undercard

Post by billy nelson »

Well I think you'll be very happy with the 3 undercard title fight very well matched IMO.
As i say though Burns v Beltran will be some fight
geoffburt07
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 237
Joined: 16 Jul 2010, 09:49

Re: Burns undercard

Post by geoffburt07 »

What are the title fights then?
billy nelson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1966
Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49

Re: Burns undercard

Post by billy nelson »

geoffburt07 wrote:What are the title fights then?
I'm sure they will be announced very soon
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Burns undercard

Post by expe »

billy nelson wrote:Well I think you'll be very happy with the 3 undercard title fight very well matched IMO.
As i say though Burns v Beltran will be some fight
You don't want it to be a great fight though, surely you'd rather Ricky took Beltran apart and smashed him up.
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13499
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Burns undercard

Post by jameswilson »

Simmons and Camacho seem to be getting developed in parallel with the aim of them eventually facing off in about 6 months time possibly for some kind of domestic title.
billy nelson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1966
Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49

Re: Burns undercard

Post by billy nelson »

expe wrote:
billy nelson wrote:Well I think you'll be very happy with the 3 undercard title fight very well matched IMO.
As i say though Burns v Beltran will be some fight
You don't want it to be a great fight though, surely you'd rather Ricky took Beltran apart and smashed him up.
That's the plan mate.
thewarcap
Super Middleweight
Posts: 27
Joined: 17 Feb 2013, 18:33

Re: Burns undercard

Post by thewarcap »

Simpson to fight for Selbly's vacated Commonwealth

Simmons to fight for a WBC something
geoffburt07
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 237
Joined: 16 Jul 2010, 09:49

Re: Burns undercard

Post by geoffburt07 »

I knew simpson was boxing for commenwealth but think they found it hard to get opponent.
billy nelson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1966
Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49

Re: Burns undercard

Post by billy nelson »

geoffburt07 wrote:I knew simpson was boxing for commenwealth but think they found it hard to get opponent.
So a world title,commonwealth,WBC something and Celic title,plus Luke Campbell,Cardle and Brophy and your not sure if its worth a min of £40 come on mate
daviddee
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1574
Joined: 01 Feb 2012, 14:32

Re: Burns undercard

Post by daviddee »

billy nelson wrote:
geoffburt07 wrote:I knew simpson was boxing for commenwealth but think they found it hard to get opponent.
So a world title,commonwealth,WBC something and Celic title,plus Luke Campbell,Cardle and Brophy and your not sure if its worth a min of £40 come on mate
Billy it depends who they fight against. If the opposition is poor then the undercard isn't worth it.. It's worth the entrance money alone to watch Ricky but unless the other fights were evenly matched fights I wouldn't waste my time as I hate watching mismatches
geoffburt07
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 237
Joined: 16 Jul 2010, 09:49

Re: Burns undercard

Post by geoffburt07 »

Stop getting your panties in a twist Billy aha. I said I don't want to take a holiday and travel to the to the show if its not 50/50 fights. Just because there's certain belts on the line doesn't mean they will be good fights. Hearn usually matches well and I know Morrison isn't scared to put his boys in with good guys but like most, I wouldn't buy tickets without knowing the line up.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23190
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Burns undercard

Post by mickey1975 »

billy nelson wrote:
geoffburt07 wrote:I knew simpson was boxing for commenwealth but think they found it hard to get opponent.
So a world title,commonwealth,WBC something and Celic title,plus Luke Campbell,Cardle and Brophy and your not sure if its worth a min of £40 come on mate
Is there pie and peas?
Alba
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1944
Joined: 28 Jul 2009, 16:05

Re: Burns undercard

Post by Alba »

geoffburt07 wrote:Stop getting your panties in a twist Billy aha. I said I don't want to take a holiday and travel to the to the show if its not 50/50 fights. Just because there's certain belts on the line doesn't mean they will be good fights. Hearn usually matches well and I know Morrison isn't scared to put his boys in with good guys but like most, I wouldn't buy tickets without knowing the line up.
I think the line up of home fighters is decent enough value for £40 , plus getting to see Luke Campbell and Scott Cardle aswell ,as these guys wont be fighting reguarly up here. Its all down to opnions of course, but 3/4 title fights over the championship distance is good value, while the opponents might not be public knowledge or even up on Box rec im sure there will be some decent ones in there ...
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13499
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Burns undercard

Post by jameswilson »

mickey1975 wrote:
billy nelson wrote:
geoffburt07 wrote:I knew simpson was boxing for commenwealth but think they found it hard to get opponent.
So a world title,commonwealth,WBC something and Celic title,plus Luke Campbell,Cardle and Brophy and your not sure if its worth a min of £40 come on mate
Is there pie and peas?
Yeah with a deep fried can of Irn bru to drink.
billy nelson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1966
Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49

Re: Burns undercard

Post by billy nelson »

Alba wrote:
geoffburt07 wrote:Stop getting your panties in a twist Billy aha. I said I don't want to take a holiday and travel to the to the show if its not 50/50 fights. Just because there's certain belts on the line doesn't mean they will be good fights. Hearn usually matches well and I know Morrison isn't scared to put his boys in with good guys but like most, I wouldn't buy tickets without knowing the line up.
I think the line up of home fighters is decent enough value for £40 , plus getting to see Luke Campbell and Scott Cardle aswell ,as these guys wont be fighting reguarly up here. Its all down to opnions of course, but 3/4 title fights over the championship distance is good value, while the opponents might not be public knowledge or even up on Box rec im sure there will be some decent ones in there ...
I think Cardle will be up here more often after all his family are Scottish?
Hes actually sparring Ricky for a week soon
Alba
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1944
Joined: 28 Jul 2009, 16:05

Re: Burns undercard

Post by Alba »

billy nelson wrote:
Alba wrote:
geoffburt07 wrote:Stop getting your panties in a twist Billy aha. I said I don't want to take a holiday and travel to the to the show if its not 50/50 fights. Just because there's certain belts on the line doesn't mean they will be good fights. Hearn usually matches well and I know Morrison isn't scared to put his boys in with good guys but like most, I wouldn't buy tickets without knowing the line up.
I think the line up of home fighters is decent enough value for £40 , plus getting to see Luke Campbell and Scott Cardle aswell ,as these guys wont be fighting reguarly up here. Its all down to opnions of course, but 3/4 title fights over the championship distance is good value, while the opponents might not be public knowledge or even up on Box rec im sure there will be some decent ones in there ...
I think Cardle will be up here more often after all his family are Scottish?
Hes actually sparring Ricky for a week soon
yes i am aware that he has Scottish family ,his brother used to play/or plays for dunfermaline blah blah , but out of his eleven fights he hasent had one up here yet has , so i think its fair to say he wont be fighting up here as much as down south ? you might know different, however i was basing my assessment on the details i have provided
geoffburt07
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 237
Joined: 16 Jul 2010, 09:49

Re: Burns undercard

Post by geoffburt07 »

Yeah, think his brother plays for Raith now. Cardle is a good boxer. He should get down to lightweight because there's a few good fights for him. Cardle v Tommy Coyle would be good.
maley1984
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1773
Joined: 13 May 2010, 05:15

Re: Burns undercard

Post by maley1984 »

geoffburt07 wrote:I knew simpson was boxing for commenwealth but think they found it hard to get opponent.

just had a tweet off ryan walsh and his fighting selby for both his titles which wud mean no shot for simpson at feather
Post Reply