Burns undercard
-
geoffburt07
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 237
- Joined: 16 Jul 2010, 09:49
Burns undercard
Same home fighters as last time but any word on titles fights or opponents?
-
geoffburt07
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 237
- Joined: 16 Jul 2010, 09:49
Re: Burns undercard
Think Slowey is boxing for title, as is Simmons and Simpson at feather. Dunno about Cardle.
Re: Burns undercard
geoffburt07 wrote:Think Slowey is boxing for title, as is Simmons and Simpson at feather. Dunno about Cardle.
Slowey fighting for a celtic title
http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/sport/box ... n.21768315
-
geoffburt07
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 237
- Joined: 16 Jul 2010, 09:49
Re: Burns undercard
Unnamed opponent? Not too many too chose from. Simmons and Simpson going for titles too. Waiting to see undercard lineup before getting ticks
-
billy nelson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1966
- Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49
Re: Burns undercard
The main fight is worth the entry fee alone let alone another 3 title fight plus Luke Campbell and Scotty Cardle,David Brophy what is there to think about?geoffburt07 wrote:Unnamed opponent? Not too many too chose from. Simmons and Simpson going for titles too. Waiting to see undercard lineup before getting ticks
-
geoffburt07
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 237
- Joined: 16 Jul 2010, 09:49
Re: Burns undercard
If any fights are well matched. I don't want to take holidays off work to go to a show that's a complete shutout for all home fighters with no excitement. Surely you know some away boxers?
Re: Burns undercard
Celtic title would think they will be looking for someone like Dai Davies for Slowey. Hope I'm wrong on that one. What's the chance of Brophy v Boulden rematch?? I think apart from Ricky's fight the rest will be very easy fights too call!!
-
billy nelson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1966
- Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49
Re: Burns undercard
Well I think you'll be very happy with the 3 undercard title fight very well matched IMO.
As i say though Burns v Beltran will be some fight
As i say though Burns v Beltran will be some fight
-
geoffburt07
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 237
- Joined: 16 Jul 2010, 09:49
Re: Burns undercard
What are the title fights then?
-
billy nelson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1966
- Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49
Re: Burns undercard
I'm sure they will be announced very soongeoffburt07 wrote:What are the title fights then?
Re: Burns undercard
You don't want it to be a great fight though, surely you'd rather Ricky took Beltran apart and smashed him up.billy nelson wrote:Well I think you'll be very happy with the 3 undercard title fight very well matched IMO.
As i say though Burns v Beltran will be some fight
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13499
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Burns undercard
Simmons and Camacho seem to be getting developed in parallel with the aim of them eventually facing off in about 6 months time possibly for some kind of domestic title.
-
billy nelson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1966
- Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49
Re: Burns undercard
That's the plan mate.expe wrote:You don't want it to be a great fight though, surely you'd rather Ricky took Beltran apart and smashed him up.billy nelson wrote:Well I think you'll be very happy with the 3 undercard title fight very well matched IMO.
As i say though Burns v Beltran will be some fight
Re: Burns undercard
Simpson to fight for Selbly's vacated Commonwealth
Simmons to fight for a WBC something
Simmons to fight for a WBC something
-
geoffburt07
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 237
- Joined: 16 Jul 2010, 09:49
Re: Burns undercard
I knew simpson was boxing for commenwealth but think they found it hard to get opponent.
-
billy nelson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1966
- Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49
Re: Burns undercard
So a world title,commonwealth,WBC something and Celic title,plus Luke Campbell,Cardle and Brophy and your not sure if its worth a min of £40 come on mategeoffburt07 wrote:I knew simpson was boxing for commenwealth but think they found it hard to get opponent.
Re: Burns undercard
Billy it depends who they fight against. If the opposition is poor then the undercard isn't worth it.. It's worth the entrance money alone to watch Ricky but unless the other fights were evenly matched fights I wouldn't waste my time as I hate watching mismatchesbilly nelson wrote:So a world title,commonwealth,WBC something and Celic title,plus Luke Campbell,Cardle and Brophy and your not sure if its worth a min of £40 come on mategeoffburt07 wrote:I knew simpson was boxing for commenwealth but think they found it hard to get opponent.
-
geoffburt07
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 237
- Joined: 16 Jul 2010, 09:49
Re: Burns undercard
Stop getting your panties in a twist Billy aha. I said I don't want to take a holiday and travel to the to the show if its not 50/50 fights. Just because there's certain belts on the line doesn't mean they will be good fights. Hearn usually matches well and I know Morrison isn't scared to put his boys in with good guys but like most, I wouldn't buy tickets without knowing the line up.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23191
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Burns undercard
Is there pie and peas?billy nelson wrote:So a world title,commonwealth,WBC something and Celic title,plus Luke Campbell,Cardle and Brophy and your not sure if its worth a min of £40 come on mategeoffburt07 wrote:I knew simpson was boxing for commenwealth but think they found it hard to get opponent.
Re: Burns undercard
I think the line up of home fighters is decent enough value for £40 , plus getting to see Luke Campbell and Scott Cardle aswell ,as these guys wont be fighting reguarly up here. Its all down to opnions of course, but 3/4 title fights over the championship distance is good value, while the opponents might not be public knowledge or even up on Box rec im sure there will be some decent ones in there ...geoffburt07 wrote:Stop getting your panties in a twist Billy aha. I said I don't want to take a holiday and travel to the to the show if its not 50/50 fights. Just because there's certain belts on the line doesn't mean they will be good fights. Hearn usually matches well and I know Morrison isn't scared to put his boys in with good guys but like most, I wouldn't buy tickets without knowing the line up.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13499
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Burns undercard
Yeah with a deep fried can of Irn bru to drink.mickey1975 wrote:Is there pie and peas?billy nelson wrote:So a world title,commonwealth,WBC something and Celic title,plus Luke Campbell,Cardle and Brophy and your not sure if its worth a min of £40 come on mategeoffburt07 wrote:I knew simpson was boxing for commenwealth but think they found it hard to get opponent.
-
billy nelson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1966
- Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49
Re: Burns undercard
I think Cardle will be up here more often after all his family are Scottish?Alba wrote:I think the line up of home fighters is decent enough value for £40 , plus getting to see Luke Campbell and Scott Cardle aswell ,as these guys wont be fighting reguarly up here. Its all down to opnions of course, but 3/4 title fights over the championship distance is good value, while the opponents might not be public knowledge or even up on Box rec im sure there will be some decent ones in there ...geoffburt07 wrote:Stop getting your panties in a twist Billy aha. I said I don't want to take a holiday and travel to the to the show if its not 50/50 fights. Just because there's certain belts on the line doesn't mean they will be good fights. Hearn usually matches well and I know Morrison isn't scared to put his boys in with good guys but like most, I wouldn't buy tickets without knowing the line up.
Hes actually sparring Ricky for a week soon
Re: Burns undercard
yes i am aware that he has Scottish family ,his brother used to play/or plays for dunfermaline blah blah , but out of his eleven fights he hasent had one up here yet has , so i think its fair to say he wont be fighting up here as much as down south ? you might know different, however i was basing my assessment on the details i have providedbilly nelson wrote:I think Cardle will be up here more often after all his family are Scottish?Alba wrote:I think the line up of home fighters is decent enough value for £40 , plus getting to see Luke Campbell and Scott Cardle aswell ,as these guys wont be fighting reguarly up here. Its all down to opnions of course, but 3/4 title fights over the championship distance is good value, while the opponents might not be public knowledge or even up on Box rec im sure there will be some decent ones in there ...geoffburt07 wrote:Stop getting your panties in a twist Billy aha. I said I don't want to take a holiday and travel to the to the show if its not 50/50 fights. Just because there's certain belts on the line doesn't mean they will be good fights. Hearn usually matches well and I know Morrison isn't scared to put his boys in with good guys but like most, I wouldn't buy tickets without knowing the line up.
Hes actually sparring Ricky for a week soon
-
geoffburt07
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 237
- Joined: 16 Jul 2010, 09:49
Re: Burns undercard
Yeah, think his brother plays for Raith now. Cardle is a good boxer. He should get down to lightweight because there's a few good fights for him. Cardle v Tommy Coyle would be good.
Re: Burns undercard
geoffburt07 wrote:I knew simpson was boxing for commenwealth but think they found it hard to get opponent.
just had a tweet off ryan walsh and his fighting selby for both his titles which wud mean no shot for simpson at feather