Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi

Post Reply
chad
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1806
Joined: 22 Sep 2011, 13:52

Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi

Post by chad »

Confirmed earlier today by allegedly. Frampton will face Parodi on the 19th October in Belfast. Framptons European title is on the line with the winner facing the winner of Romero and Martinez.
chad
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1806
Joined: 22 Sep 2011, 13:52

Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi

Post by chad »

Notcied Boxrec already have this listed. Sorry if this fight was already common knowledge.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi

Post by whiskey »

It is common knowledge but it would seem nobody cares enough to write about it.

Parodi went to the wire on points against a guy that Quigg blasted out in three rounds last month.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi

Post by leforge »

chad wrote:Confirmed earlier today by allegedly. Frampton will face Parodi on the 19th October in Belfast. Framptons European title is on the line with the winner facing the winner of Romero and Martinez.
Wrong! The winner of Martinez v Romero has to face mandatory which is not frampton or parodi winner!
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi

Post by leforge »

Mathbula is the ibf no 1 mandatory !
smoggy7188
Cruiserweight
Posts: 941
Joined: 27 Oct 2010, 12:27

Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi

Post by smoggy7188 »

quigg will get to the ibf title before frampton does.
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4730
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

Mathebula will get to it before either.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi

Post by expe »

leforge wrote:Mathbula is the ibf no 1 mandatory !
smogg7188 wrote:quigg will get to the ibf title before frampton does.
Frampton's ranked 3 and Parodi 4, with no one ranked 2nd, I'd expect the winner of this to move up to number 1. Just because a fighter is ranked 1 doesn't mean he's mandatory, Mathebula has only fought once since losing to Donaire and that wasn't an eliminator. I highly doubt Quigg will be fighting for the IBF since he's fighting Salinas for the WBA regular title on the Haye-Fury undercard.
DMA1987
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi

Post by DMA1987 »

expe wrote:
leforge wrote:Mathbula is the ibf no 1 mandatory !
smogg7188 wrote:quigg will get to the ibf title before frampton does.
Frampton's ranked 3 and Parodi 4, with no one ranked 2nd, I'd expect the winner of this to move up to number 1. Just because a fighter is ranked 1 doesn't mean he's mandatory, Mathebula has only fought once since losing to Donaire and that wasn't an eliminator. I highly doubt Quigg will be fighting for the IBF since he's fighting Salinas for the WBA regular title on the Haye-Fury undercard.
Mathebulas last fight was a Final Eliminator so I imagine he does get the shot.
iamasadlittleboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1877
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05

Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi

Post by iamasadlittleboy »

Frampton really should be asking how Kiko got a shot before he did.
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9651
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi

Post by steve689 »

Frampton said yesterday that when they approached Romero's people they were told that he had an injured bicep and would be out until September.

The winner of Romero-Martinez has to defend against Mathebula in 90 days. Frampton's fight is an eliminator to decide the next in line after that.
mullenman
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1124
Joined: 23 Oct 2012, 11:10

Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi

Post by mullenman »

his career has gone back along way this year

i blame his management team
slapbangwhallop
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2031
Joined: 13 Dec 2010, 08:27

Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi

Post by slapbangwhallop »

mullenman wrote:his career has gone back along way this year

i blame his management team
Don’t talk sh*te! Whilst I am not exactly getting a horn over the prospect of Parodi vs Frampton it is a solid fight after half a year out of the ring and its also the IBF’s #3 vs their #4. McGuigan has always had an eye on the IBF title and this edges him closer to a mandatory slot.

Martinez fights Martinez, then Mathabula and the winner faces Frampton should he stay unbeaten! It’s a calculated and focused decision to take this opponent. Hardly smacks of a career that’s aimlessly wandering, is it? And its the exact fight he would have had if he was still under a Matchroom contract!

Lets not forget as well that Carl has only had 16 fights as well.
mullenman
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1124
Joined: 23 Oct 2012, 11:10

Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi

Post by mullenman »

slapbangwhallop wrote:
mullenman wrote:his career has gone back along way this year

i blame his management team
Don’t talk sh*te! Whilst I am not exactly getting a horn over the prospect of Parodi vs Frampton it is a solid fight after half a year out of the ring and its also the IBF’s #3 vs their #4. McGuigan has always had an eye on the IBF title and this edges him closer to a mandatory slot.

Martinez fights Martinez, then Mathabula and the winner faces Frampton should he stay unbeaten! It’s a calculated and focused decision to take this opponent. Hardly smacks of a career that’s aimlessly wandering, is it? And its the exact fight he would have had if he was still under a Matchroom contract!

Lets not forget as well that Carl has only had 16 fights as well.

blahh blahh

his career has not taken off as it should have after his win over kiko-- hence it goes backwards
if your not fighting your not earning cash and people forget about you very fast

quigg is fighting on the biggest night of boxing in the UK now it could of been carl

i also bet that the attendane will be down for carls next fight compared to the kiko fight
slapbangwhallop
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2031
Joined: 13 Dec 2010, 08:27

Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi

Post by slapbangwhallop »

mullenman wrote:
slapbangwhallop wrote:
mullenman wrote:his career has gone back along way this year

i blame his management team
Don’t talk sh*te! Whilst I am not exactly getting a horn over the prospect of Parodi vs Frampton it is a solid fight after half a year out of the ring and its also the IBF’s #3 vs their #4. McGuigan has always had an eye on the IBF title and this edges him closer to a mandatory slot.

Martinez fights Martinez, then Mathabula and the winner faces Frampton should he stay unbeaten! It’s a calculated and focused decision to take this opponent. Hardly smacks of a career that’s aimlessly wandering, is it? And its the exact fight he would have had if he was still under a Matchroom contract!

Lets not forget as well that Carl has only had 16 fights as well.

blahh blahh

his career has not taken off as it should have after his win over kiko-- hence it goes backwards
if your not fighting your not earning cash and people forget about you very fast

quigg is fighting on the biggest night of boxing in the UK now it could of been carl

i also bet that the attendane will be down for carls next fight compared to the kiko fight
so you've just written off my argument with a "blah blah", slick!

"his career has not taken off as it should have after his win over kiko" - he's been injured! I a fan of Matchroom but have they got some magic voodoo doctors that would have spirited a new eardum cover for him?

"quigg is fighting on the biggest night of boxing in the UK now it could of been carl" - undercard, for what is essentially an eliminator for the real WBA title.

"i also bet that the attendane will be down for carls next fight compared to the kiko fight" - time will tell, Matchroom certainly do a great job of promotion but my guess is that Barry will pack the undercard with cracking fights and the attendance will actually be higher!
mfc_se15
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 888
Joined: 03 Mar 2012, 08:34

Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi

Post by mfc_se15 »

slapbangwhallop wrote:
so you've just written off my argument with a "blah blah", slick!

"his career has not taken off as it should have after his win over kiko" - he's been injured! I a fan of Matchroom but have they got some magic voodoo doctors that would have spirited a new eardum cover for him?

"quigg is fighting on the biggest night of boxing in the UK now it could of been carl" - undercard, for what is essentially an eliminator for the real WBA title.

"i also bet that the attendane will be down for carls next fight compared to the kiko fight" - time will tell, Matchroom certainly do a great job of promotion but my guess is that Barry will pack the undercard with cracking fights and the attendance will actually be higher!
Can it be higher than the Martinez fight? Looked it anyway. I thought that was a sell out or can they change the arena around a bit? Genuine question
slapbangwhallop
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2031
Joined: 13 Dec 2010, 08:27

Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi

Post by slapbangwhallop »

mfc_se15 wrote: Can it be higher than the Martinez fight? Looked it anyway. I thought that was a sell out or can they change the arena around a bit? Genuine question
Capacity of the Odyssey is 11,000. Not sure that is obtainable with boxing however. I think 9k is the maximum for boxing. I believe that Eddie set it up for 7.5k and it did shy of 7k. If you look at the last interview I did with Eddie at the Haye-Fury presser then he says the exact figures in that. Looked full to me from my seat as well but just shows you.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi

Post by whiskey »

slapbangwhallop wrote:
"his career has not taken off as it should have after his win over kiko" - he's been injured! I a fan of Matchroom but have they got some magic voodoo doctors that would have spirited a new eardum cover for him?

Image
slapbangwhallop
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2031
Joined: 13 Dec 2010, 08:27

Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi

Post by slapbangwhallop »

That’s the guy I was thinking of, he lives in a cupboard behind John Wish’s seat. Feeds on fried plantains and has worked wonders on Barker's hip and Haye’s left hand!
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9651
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi

Post by steve689 »

That witch doctor must be good if he's managed to get Barker all the way through a training camp without getting injured.
smoggy7188
Cruiserweight
Posts: 941
Joined: 27 Oct 2010, 12:27

Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi

Post by smoggy7188 »

expe wrote:
leforge wrote:Mathbula is the ibf no 1 mandatory !
smogg7188 wrote:quigg will get to the ibf title before frampton does.
Frampton's ranked 3 and Parodi 4, with no one ranked 2nd, I'd expect the winner of this to move up to number 1. Just because a fighter is ranked 1 doesn't mean he's mandatory, Mathebula has only fought once since losing to Donaire and that wasn't an eliminator. I highly doubt Quigg will be fighting for the IBF since he's fighting Salinas for the WBA regular title on the Haye-Fury undercard.
quigg will go for unification after beating salinas and a quick defence.
BigEars
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 992
Joined: 16 Jan 2006, 14:23

Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi

Post by BigEars »

smoggy7188 wrote:
expe wrote:
leforge wrote:Mathbula is the ibf no 1 mandatory !
smogg7188 wrote:quigg will get to the ibf title before frampton does.
Frampton's ranked 3 and Parodi 4, with no one ranked 2nd, I'd expect the winner of this to move up to number 1. Just because a fighter is ranked 1 doesn't mean he's mandatory, Mathebula has only fought once since losing to Donaire and that wasn't an eliminator. I highly doubt Quigg will be fighting for the IBF since he's fighting Salinas for the WBA regular title on the Haye-Fury undercard.
quigg will go for unification after beating salinas and a quick defence.
This may have changed but previously WBA 'Regular' champions were not allowed fight for another organisations title if there was already a 'Super' champion in that division. This was the case as fighters who unified another organisations title to the WBA title was upgraded to 'Super' champion for doing so.

Of course this may have changed but thinking logically as Guillermo Rigondeaux is WBA Super champion and WBO champion at Super-Bantamweight, I don't think the WBA would allow a unification with the WBC or IBF for Quigg should he beat Salinas. But then again stranger things have happened.
Also things are a little more difficult knowdays that the WBC actively frowns upon unification matches.
In the last 3 WBA-WBC unifications (Canelo vs Trout, Khan vs Garcia and Ioka vs Yaegashi) the fighters have been told by the WBC that should they win they will have to pick a title.
Now only Ioka ended up having to do that, but he's not the first fighter to have to (Tim Bradley vs Alexander being another example).
iamasadlittleboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1877
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05

Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi

Post by iamasadlittleboy »

BigEars wrote:This may have changed but previously WBA 'Regular' champions were not allowed fight for another organisations title if there was already a 'Super' champion in that division. This was the case as fighters who unified another organisations title to the WBA title was upgraded to 'Super' champion for doing so.

Of course this may have changed but thinking logically as Guillermo Rigondeaux is WBA Super champion and WBO champion at Super-Bantamweight, I don't think the WBA would allow a unification with the WBC or IBF for Quigg should he beat Salinas. But then again stranger things have happened.
Also things are a little more difficult knowdays that the WBC actively frowns upon unification matches.
In the last 3 WBA-WBC unifications (Canelo vs Trout, Khan vs Garcia and Ioka vs Yaegashi) the fighters have been told by the WBC that should they win they will have to pick a title.
Now only Ioka ended up having to do that, but he's not the first fighter to have to (Tim Bradley vs Alexander being another example).
The WBA have what is termed a "Unified Champion" for those that unify as well as their "Super champion" status. Usually if they have a super champion they will allow a unified champion as well, think Light Middleweight (Floyd is Super Canelo is Unified)
Post Reply