Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi
Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi
Confirmed earlier today by allegedly. Frampton will face Parodi on the 19th October in Belfast. Framptons European title is on the line with the winner facing the winner of Romero and Martinez.
Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi
Notcied Boxrec already have this listed. Sorry if this fight was already common knowledge.
Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi
It is common knowledge but it would seem nobody cares enough to write about it.
Parodi went to the wire on points against a guy that Quigg blasted out in three rounds last month.
Parodi went to the wire on points against a guy that Quigg blasted out in three rounds last month.
Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi
Wrong! The winner of Martinez v Romero has to face mandatory which is not frampton or parodi winner!chad wrote:Confirmed earlier today by allegedly. Frampton will face Parodi on the 19th October in Belfast. Framptons European title is on the line with the winner facing the winner of Romero and Martinez.
Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi
Mathbula is the ibf no 1 mandatory !
-
smoggy7188
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 941
- Joined: 27 Oct 2010, 12:27
Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi
quigg will get to the ibf title before frampton does.
-
ShadrachSimmo
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4730
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42
Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi
Mathebula will get to it before either.
Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi
leforge wrote:Mathbula is the ibf no 1 mandatory !
Frampton's ranked 3 and Parodi 4, with no one ranked 2nd, I'd expect the winner of this to move up to number 1. Just because a fighter is ranked 1 doesn't mean he's mandatory, Mathebula has only fought once since losing to Donaire and that wasn't an eliminator. I highly doubt Quigg will be fighting for the IBF since he's fighting Salinas for the WBA regular title on the Haye-Fury undercard.smogg7188 wrote:quigg will get to the ibf title before frampton does.
Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi
Mathebulas last fight was a Final Eliminator so I imagine he does get the shot.expe wrote:leforge wrote:Mathbula is the ibf no 1 mandatory !Frampton's ranked 3 and Parodi 4, with no one ranked 2nd, I'd expect the winner of this to move up to number 1. Just because a fighter is ranked 1 doesn't mean he's mandatory, Mathebula has only fought once since losing to Donaire and that wasn't an eliminator. I highly doubt Quigg will be fighting for the IBF since he's fighting Salinas for the WBA regular title on the Haye-Fury undercard.smogg7188 wrote:quigg will get to the ibf title before frampton does.
-
iamasadlittleboy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1877
- Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05
Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi
Frampton really should be asking how Kiko got a shot before he did.
Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi
Frampton said yesterday that when they approached Romero's people they were told that he had an injured bicep and would be out until September.
The winner of Romero-Martinez has to defend against Mathebula in 90 days. Frampton's fight is an eliminator to decide the next in line after that.
The winner of Romero-Martinez has to defend against Mathebula in 90 days. Frampton's fight is an eliminator to decide the next in line after that.
Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi
his career has gone back along way this year
i blame his management team
i blame his management team
-
slapbangwhallop
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 2031
- Joined: 13 Dec 2010, 08:27
Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi
Don’t talk sh*te! Whilst I am not exactly getting a horn over the prospect of Parodi vs Frampton it is a solid fight after half a year out of the ring and its also the IBF’s #3 vs their #4. McGuigan has always had an eye on the IBF title and this edges him closer to a mandatory slot.mullenman wrote:his career has gone back along way this year
i blame his management team
Martinez fights Martinez, then Mathabula and the winner faces Frampton should he stay unbeaten! It’s a calculated and focused decision to take this opponent. Hardly smacks of a career that’s aimlessly wandering, is it? And its the exact fight he would have had if he was still under a Matchroom contract!
Lets not forget as well that Carl has only had 16 fights as well.
Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi
slapbangwhallop wrote:Don’t talk sh*te! Whilst I am not exactly getting a horn over the prospect of Parodi vs Frampton it is a solid fight after half a year out of the ring and its also the IBF’s #3 vs their #4. McGuigan has always had an eye on the IBF title and this edges him closer to a mandatory slot.mullenman wrote:his career has gone back along way this year
i blame his management team
Martinez fights Martinez, then Mathabula and the winner faces Frampton should he stay unbeaten! It’s a calculated and focused decision to take this opponent. Hardly smacks of a career that’s aimlessly wandering, is it? And its the exact fight he would have had if he was still under a Matchroom contract!
Lets not forget as well that Carl has only had 16 fights as well.
blahh blahh
his career has not taken off as it should have after his win over kiko-- hence it goes backwards
if your not fighting your not earning cash and people forget about you very fast
quigg is fighting on the biggest night of boxing in the UK now it could of been carl
i also bet that the attendane will be down for carls next fight compared to the kiko fight
-
slapbangwhallop
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 2031
- Joined: 13 Dec 2010, 08:27
Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi
so you've just written off my argument with a "blah blah", slick!mullenman wrote:slapbangwhallop wrote:Don’t talk sh*te! Whilst I am not exactly getting a horn over the prospect of Parodi vs Frampton it is a solid fight after half a year out of the ring and its also the IBF’s #3 vs their #4. McGuigan has always had an eye on the IBF title and this edges him closer to a mandatory slot.mullenman wrote:his career has gone back along way this year
i blame his management team
Martinez fights Martinez, then Mathabula and the winner faces Frampton should he stay unbeaten! It’s a calculated and focused decision to take this opponent. Hardly smacks of a career that’s aimlessly wandering, is it? And its the exact fight he would have had if he was still under a Matchroom contract!
Lets not forget as well that Carl has only had 16 fights as well.
blahh blahh
his career has not taken off as it should have after his win over kiko-- hence it goes backwards
if your not fighting your not earning cash and people forget about you very fast
quigg is fighting on the biggest night of boxing in the UK now it could of been carl
i also bet that the attendane will be down for carls next fight compared to the kiko fight
"his career has not taken off as it should have after his win over kiko" - he's been injured! I a fan of Matchroom but have they got some magic voodoo doctors that would have spirited a new eardum cover for him?
"quigg is fighting on the biggest night of boxing in the UK now it could of been carl" - undercard, for what is essentially an eliminator for the real WBA title.
"i also bet that the attendane will be down for carls next fight compared to the kiko fight" - time will tell, Matchroom certainly do a great job of promotion but my guess is that Barry will pack the undercard with cracking fights and the attendance will actually be higher!
Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi
Can it be higher than the Martinez fight? Looked it anyway. I thought that was a sell out or can they change the arena around a bit? Genuine questionslapbangwhallop wrote:
so you've just written off my argument with a "blah blah", slick!
"his career has not taken off as it should have after his win over kiko" - he's been injured! I a fan of Matchroom but have they got some magic voodoo doctors that would have spirited a new eardum cover for him?
"quigg is fighting on the biggest night of boxing in the UK now it could of been carl" - undercard, for what is essentially an eliminator for the real WBA title.
"i also bet that the attendane will be down for carls next fight compared to the kiko fight" - time will tell, Matchroom certainly do a great job of promotion but my guess is that Barry will pack the undercard with cracking fights and the attendance will actually be higher!
-
slapbangwhallop
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 2031
- Joined: 13 Dec 2010, 08:27
Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi
Capacity of the Odyssey is 11,000. Not sure that is obtainable with boxing however. I think 9k is the maximum for boxing. I believe that Eddie set it up for 7.5k and it did shy of 7k. If you look at the last interview I did with Eddie at the Haye-Fury presser then he says the exact figures in that. Looked full to me from my seat as well but just shows you.mfc_se15 wrote: Can it be higher than the Martinez fight? Looked it anyway. I thought that was a sell out or can they change the arena around a bit? Genuine question
Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi
slapbangwhallop wrote:
"his career has not taken off as it should have after his win over kiko" - he's been injured! I a fan of Matchroom but have they got some magic voodoo doctors that would have spirited a new eardum cover for him?

-
slapbangwhallop
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 2031
- Joined: 13 Dec 2010, 08:27
Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi
That’s the guy I was thinking of, he lives in a cupboard behind John Wish’s seat. Feeds on fried plantains and has worked wonders on Barker's hip and Haye’s left hand!
Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi
That witch doctor must be good if he's managed to get Barker all the way through a training camp without getting injured.
-
smoggy7188
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 941
- Joined: 27 Oct 2010, 12:27
Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi
quigg will go for unification after beating salinas and a quick defence.expe wrote:leforge wrote:Mathbula is the ibf no 1 mandatory !Frampton's ranked 3 and Parodi 4, with no one ranked 2nd, I'd expect the winner of this to move up to number 1. Just because a fighter is ranked 1 doesn't mean he's mandatory, Mathebula has only fought once since losing to Donaire and that wasn't an eliminator. I highly doubt Quigg will be fighting for the IBF since he's fighting Salinas for the WBA regular title on the Haye-Fury undercard.smogg7188 wrote:quigg will get to the ibf title before frampton does.
Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi
This may have changed but previously WBA 'Regular' champions were not allowed fight for another organisations title if there was already a 'Super' champion in that division. This was the case as fighters who unified another organisations title to the WBA title was upgraded to 'Super' champion for doing so.smoggy7188 wrote:quigg will go for unification after beating salinas and a quick defence.expe wrote:leforge wrote:Mathbula is the ibf no 1 mandatory !Frampton's ranked 3 and Parodi 4, with no one ranked 2nd, I'd expect the winner of this to move up to number 1. Just because a fighter is ranked 1 doesn't mean he's mandatory, Mathebula has only fought once since losing to Donaire and that wasn't an eliminator. I highly doubt Quigg will be fighting for the IBF since he's fighting Salinas for the WBA regular title on the Haye-Fury undercard.smogg7188 wrote:quigg will get to the ibf title before frampton does.
Of course this may have changed but thinking logically as Guillermo Rigondeaux is WBA Super champion and WBO champion at Super-Bantamweight, I don't think the WBA would allow a unification with the WBC or IBF for Quigg should he beat Salinas. But then again stranger things have happened.
Also things are a little more difficult knowdays that the WBC actively frowns upon unification matches.
In the last 3 WBA-WBC unifications (Canelo vs Trout, Khan vs Garcia and Ioka vs Yaegashi) the fighters have been told by the WBC that should they win they will have to pick a title.
Now only Ioka ended up having to do that, but he's not the first fighter to have to (Tim Bradley vs Alexander being another example).
-
iamasadlittleboy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1877
- Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05
Re: Carl Frampton IBF Eliminator Vs. Jeremy Parodi
The WBA have what is termed a "Unified Champion" for those that unify as well as their "Super champion" status. Usually if they have a super champion they will allow a unified champion as well, think Light Middleweight (Floyd is Super Canelo is Unified)BigEars wrote:This may have changed but previously WBA 'Regular' champions were not allowed fight for another organisations title if there was already a 'Super' champion in that division. This was the case as fighters who unified another organisations title to the WBA title was upgraded to 'Super' champion for doing so.
Of course this may have changed but thinking logically as Guillermo Rigondeaux is WBA Super champion and WBO champion at Super-Bantamweight, I don't think the WBA would allow a unification with the WBC or IBF for Quigg should he beat Salinas. But then again stranger things have happened.
Also things are a little more difficult knowdays that the WBC actively frowns upon unification matches.
In the last 3 WBA-WBC unifications (Canelo vs Trout, Khan vs Garcia and Ioka vs Yaegashi) the fighters have been told by the WBC that should they win they will have to pick a title.
Now only Ioka ended up having to do that, but he's not the first fighter to have to (Tim Bradley vs Alexander being another example).