Ike Ibeabuchi vs . Ray Mercer
-
Vladimir5555
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1221
- Joined: 12 Apr 2013, 11:38
Ike Ibeabuchi vs . Ray Mercer
I think it was be a big sluggerfest.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Ike Ibeabuchi vs . Ray Mercer
I think Mercer was better at his best, but you can never count on him being in shape. Might have to bet Ike by close decision on activity. I think it would have been the kind of fight that people pretend Ike/Tua was. Maybe it's because I saw it after the fact, but I don't think I've ever been more disappointed by a talked up fight.
-
dempseyfire
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5534
- Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56
Re: Ike Ibeabuchi vs . Ray Mercer
At their peak give me the guy with the jab (Mercer), but Ike has the better conditioning and work-rate, pretty even matchup.
The funny thing about Ike-Tua is I remember watching it live with a bunch of friends and at the time it seemed like an incredible fight (of course expectations were pretty low). Watched it years later and I don't see it as a great slugfest at all; just a decent brawl. Shows you how expectations can temper a fight's perception. Although there have been many fights which I watched after being talked up and they met those expectations; I didn't see Barrera-McKinney until years after it happened and if anything it exceeded what I'd heard it would be.
The funny thing about Ike-Tua is I remember watching it live with a bunch of friends and at the time it seemed like an incredible fight (of course expectations were pretty low). Watched it years later and I don't see it as a great slugfest at all; just a decent brawl. Shows you how expectations can temper a fight's perception. Although there have been many fights which I watched after being talked up and they met those expectations; I didn't see Barrera-McKinney until years after it happened and if anything it exceeded what I'd heard it would be.
Last edited by dempseyfire on 15 Aug 2013, 22:43, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Ike Ibeabuchi vs . Ray Mercer
I was quite letdown by Tua/Ibeabuchi as well. It's a good fight, but certainly not the all time classic it's made out to be by fans.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I think Mercer was better at his best, but you can never count on him being in shape. Might have to bet Ike by close decision on activity. I think it would have been the kind of fight that people pretend Ike/Tua was. Maybe it's because I saw it after the fact, but I don't think I've ever been more disappointed by a talked up fight.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Ike Ibeabuchi vs . Ray Mercer
So many people told me how great it was and it's always one of the first fights mentioned in a Heavyweight fights thread. It's not like it sucked, but it lacked drama to me. Neither of them could hurt the other, it was almost like watching a video game with damage turned off and they just flailed on the buttons.dempseyfire wrote:At their peak give me the guy with the jab (Mercer), but Ike has the better conditioning and work-rate, pretty even matchup.
The funny thing about Ike-Tua is I remember watching it live with a bunch of friends and at the time it seemed like an incredible fight (of course expectations were pretty low). Watched it years later and I don't see it as a great slugfest at all; just a decent brawl. Shows you how expectations can temper a fight's perception. Although there have been many fights which I watched after being talked up and they met those expectations; I didn't see Barrera-McKinney until years after it happened and if anything it exceeded what I thought it would be.
Re: Ike Ibeabuchi vs . Ray Mercer
Best v. best, Mercer on points for me; his jab would win it.