Ike Ibeabuchi vs . Ray Mercer

Post Reply
Vladimir5555
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1221
Joined: 12 Apr 2013, 11:38

Ike Ibeabuchi vs . Ray Mercer

Post by Vladimir5555 »

I think it was be a big sluggerfest.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Ike Ibeabuchi vs . Ray Mercer

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

I think Mercer was better at his best, but you can never count on him being in shape. Might have to bet Ike by close decision on activity. I think it would have been the kind of fight that people pretend Ike/Tua was. Maybe it's because I saw it after the fact, but I don't think I've ever been more disappointed by a talked up fight.
dempseyfire
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5534
Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56

Re: Ike Ibeabuchi vs . Ray Mercer

Post by dempseyfire »

At their peak give me the guy with the jab (Mercer), but Ike has the better conditioning and work-rate, pretty even matchup.

The funny thing about Ike-Tua is I remember watching it live with a bunch of friends and at the time it seemed like an incredible fight (of course expectations were pretty low). Watched it years later and I don't see it as a great slugfest at all; just a decent brawl. Shows you how expectations can temper a fight's perception. Although there have been many fights which I watched after being talked up and they met those expectations; I didn't see Barrera-McKinney until years after it happened and if anything it exceeded what I'd heard it would be.
Last edited by dempseyfire on 15 Aug 2013, 22:43, edited 1 time in total.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46512
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Ike Ibeabuchi vs . Ray Mercer

Post by gilgamesh »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I think Mercer was better at his best, but you can never count on him being in shape. Might have to bet Ike by close decision on activity. I think it would have been the kind of fight that people pretend Ike/Tua was. Maybe it's because I saw it after the fact, but I don't think I've ever been more disappointed by a talked up fight.
I was quite letdown by Tua/Ibeabuchi as well. It's a good fight, but certainly not the all time classic it's made out to be by fans.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Ike Ibeabuchi vs . Ray Mercer

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

dempseyfire wrote:At their peak give me the guy with the jab (Mercer), but Ike has the better conditioning and work-rate, pretty even matchup.

The funny thing about Ike-Tua is I remember watching it live with a bunch of friends and at the time it seemed like an incredible fight (of course expectations were pretty low). Watched it years later and I don't see it as a great slugfest at all; just a decent brawl. Shows you how expectations can temper a fight's perception. Although there have been many fights which I watched after being talked up and they met those expectations; I didn't see Barrera-McKinney until years after it happened and if anything it exceeded what I thought it would be.
So many people told me how great it was and it's always one of the first fights mentioned in a Heavyweight fights thread. It's not like it sucked, but it lacked drama to me. Neither of them could hurt the other, it was almost like watching a video game with damage turned off and they just flailed on the buttons.
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Ike Ibeabuchi vs . Ray Mercer

Post by Rover »

Best v. best, Mercer on points for me; his jab would win it.
Post Reply