Wlad vs . Michael Moorer
-
Vladimir5555
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1221
- Joined: 12 Apr 2013, 11:38
Wlad vs . Michael Moorer
What happened in this fight?
Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer
Wladimir KO 7-9 (somewhere in that range)
Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer
Sounds about right.gilgamesh wrote:Wladimir KO 7-9 (somewhere in that range)
-
Ambling Alp II
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 15173
- Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31
Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer
I don't think it would last that long. This would probably just be a matter of who nailed who first.
Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer
Wlad's fights always last long. I swear he could carry a corpse 5 rounds.Ambling Alp II wrote:I don't think it would last that long. This would probably just be a matter of who nailed who first.
Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer
God, doesn't say much for Mormeck or Austin, does it?gilgamesh wrote:Wlad's fights always last long. I swear he could carry a corpse 5 rounds.Ambling Alp II wrote:I don't think it would last that long. This would probably just be a matter of who nailed who first.
Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer
Mormeck essentially was a corpse when Wlad got him.Rover wrote:God, doesn't say much for Mormeck or Austin, does it?gilgamesh wrote:Wlad's fights always last long. I swear he could carry a corpse 5 rounds.Ambling Alp II wrote:I don't think it would last that long. This would probably just be a matter of who nailed who first.
Wlad didn't even have to use two hands to be Ray Austin...so I mean...that says it all
Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer
He didn't carry Mormeck the corpse 5 rounds.:)
Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer
Maybe he was a little deader than dead in thereRover wrote:He didn't carry Mormeck the corpse 5 rounds.:)
Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer
gilgamesh wrote:Maybe he was a little deader than dead in thereRover wrote:He didn't carry Mormeck the corpse 5 rounds.:)
Then what was Austin?
Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer
A mediocre fighter who had no business ever being in the Ring with the Heavyweight Champion.Rover wrote:gilgamesh wrote:Maybe he was a little deader than dead in thereRover wrote:He didn't carry Mormeck the corpse 5 rounds.:)
Then what was Austin?
Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer
I think he was a mandatory if memory serves. Agree on his mediocrity.
Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer
So was Mourade HakkarRover wrote:I think he was a mandatory if memory serves. Agree on his mediocrity.
Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer
Correct, and so was Hasim Rahman (not referring to prime version, of course, which would've been a legit mandatory).gilgamesh wrote:So was Mourade HakkarRover wrote:I think he was a mandatory if memory serves. Agree on his mediocrity., I know Wlad had to fight him because some crappy organization said so, didn't make him any more worthy.
Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer
Wlad at the high of his power would probably decision Moorer in my opinion.
-
Ambling Alp II
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 15173
- Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31
Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer
I guess anything is possible, but when you have two guys with those kind of chins and both can whack, the chances of it going the distance is slim.
Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer
I gotta think if old man Foreman could time Moorer then Wlad could not to mention he would probably be beating the piss out of Moorer before knocking him out.Crease wrote:Wlad at the high of his power would probably decision Moorer in my opinion.
-
Ambling Alp II
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 15173
- Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31
Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer
That makes sense. Not hard to envision it happening.
On the other hand if Ross Purrity, Corrie Sanders, and Lamon Brewster could crush Klitschko, Moorer would be capable as well.
On the other hand if Ross Purrity, Corrie Sanders, and Lamon Brewster could crush Klitschko, Moorer would be capable as well.
Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer
good point but would you consider Klitchscko at his prime at that point though?Ambling Alp II wrote:That makes sense. Not hard to envision it happening.
On the other hand if Ross Purrity, Corrie Sanders, and Lamon Brewster could crush Klitschko, Moorer would be capable as well.
-
Ambling Alp II
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 15173
- Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31
Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer
Kind of hard to say. I certainly count all of these fights; he was in his 20's for all of them.
Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer
It is hard with some guys knowing exactly when their prime is when you factor in age vs experience
-
dempseyfire
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5534
- Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56
Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer
First thought is Klitschko by late TKO. Could see Wlad with a decision win though since Moorer could bang and Wlad would fight his usual scaredy-cat style vs anyone with the ability to hurt him, and Moorer isn't any smaller than Ibragimov. But Moorer had slow feet and wouldn't cut the distance down enough to do any significant damage. In any case a clear Klitschko win.
-
Ambling Alp II
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 15173
- Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31
Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer
If you are thinking that he was a better fighter in his 30s that is not the case. He has been been feasting on even weaker opponents in the last several years. His best performances were during his 20s.p4p1 wrote:It is hard with some guys knowing exactly when their prime is when you factor in age vs experience
He has learned to minimize his flaws somewhat (glass jaw and poor stamina) and is better handling what to do when hurt. However, he has declined considerably offensively.
He was no green rookie when he got stopped earlier in his career anyway.
Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer
Yeah, I doubt this goes to the cards.p4p1 wrote:I gotta think if old man Foreman could time Moorer then Wlad could not to mention he would probably be beating the piss out of Moorer before knocking him out.Crease wrote:Wlad at the high of his power would probably decision Moorer in my opinion.
Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer
Moorer could of done same as Chambers and Brock.