Wlad vs . Michael Moorer

Post Reply
Vladimir5555
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1221
Joined: 12 Apr 2013, 11:38

Wlad vs . Michael Moorer

Post by Vladimir5555 »

What happened in this fight?
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46514
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer

Post by gilgamesh »

Wladimir KO 7-9 (somewhere in that range)
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer

Post by Rover »

gilgamesh wrote:Wladimir KO 7-9 (somewhere in that range)
Sounds about right.
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15173
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer

Post by Ambling Alp II »

I don't think it would last that long. This would probably just be a matter of who nailed who first.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46514
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer

Post by gilgamesh »

Ambling Alp II wrote:I don't think it would last that long. This would probably just be a matter of who nailed who first.
Wlad's fights always last long. I swear he could carry a corpse 5 rounds.
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer

Post by Rover »

gilgamesh wrote:
Ambling Alp II wrote:I don't think it would last that long. This would probably just be a matter of who nailed who first.
Wlad's fights always last long. I swear he could carry a corpse 5 rounds.
God, doesn't say much for Mormeck or Austin, does it?
:D
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46514
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer

Post by gilgamesh »

Rover wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
Ambling Alp II wrote:I don't think it would last that long. This would probably just be a matter of who nailed who first.
Wlad's fights always last long. I swear he could carry a corpse 5 rounds.
God, doesn't say much for Mormeck or Austin, does it?
:D
Mormeck essentially was a corpse when Wlad got him.

Wlad didn't even have to use two hands to be Ray Austin...so I mean...that says it all :lol:
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer

Post by Rover »

He didn't carry Mormeck the corpse 5 rounds.:)
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46514
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer

Post by gilgamesh »

Rover wrote:He didn't carry Mormeck the corpse 5 rounds.:)
Maybe he was a little deader than dead in there :lol:
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer

Post by Rover »

gilgamesh wrote:
Rover wrote:He didn't carry Mormeck the corpse 5 rounds.:)
Maybe he was a little deader than dead in there :lol:
:lol:
Then what was Austin?
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46514
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer

Post by gilgamesh »

Rover wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
Rover wrote:He didn't carry Mormeck the corpse 5 rounds.:)
Maybe he was a little deader than dead in there :lol:
:lol:
Then what was Austin?
A mediocre fighter who had no business ever being in the Ring with the Heavyweight Champion.
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer

Post by Rover »

I think he was a mandatory if memory serves. Agree on his mediocrity.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46514
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer

Post by gilgamesh »

Rover wrote:I think he was a mandatory if memory serves. Agree on his mediocrity.
So was Mourade Hakkar :lol: , I know Wlad had to fight him because some crappy organization said so, didn't make him any more worthy.
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer

Post by Rover »

gilgamesh wrote:
Rover wrote:I think he was a mandatory if memory serves. Agree on his mediocrity.
So was Mourade Hakkar :lol: , I know Wlad had to fight him because some crappy organization said so, didn't make him any more worthy.
Correct, and so was Hasim Rahman (not referring to prime version, of course, which would've been a legit mandatory).
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16865
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer

Post by Crease »

Wlad at the high of his power would probably decision Moorer in my opinion.
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15173
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer

Post by Ambling Alp II »

I guess anything is possible, but when you have two guys with those kind of chins and both can whack, the chances of it going the distance is slim.
p4p1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5854
Joined: 23 Apr 2007, 07:43

Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer

Post by p4p1 »

Crease wrote:Wlad at the high of his power would probably decision Moorer in my opinion.
I gotta think if old man Foreman could time Moorer then Wlad could not to mention he would probably be beating the piss out of Moorer before knocking him out.
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15173
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer

Post by Ambling Alp II »

That makes sense. Not hard to envision it happening.
On the other hand if Ross Purrity, Corrie Sanders, and Lamon Brewster could crush Klitschko, Moorer would be capable as well.
p4p1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5854
Joined: 23 Apr 2007, 07:43

Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer

Post by p4p1 »

Ambling Alp II wrote:That makes sense. Not hard to envision it happening.
On the other hand if Ross Purrity, Corrie Sanders, and Lamon Brewster could crush Klitschko, Moorer would be capable as well.
good point but would you consider Klitchscko at his prime at that point though?
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15173
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer

Post by Ambling Alp II »

Kind of hard to say. I certainly count all of these fights; he was in his 20's for all of them.
p4p1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5854
Joined: 23 Apr 2007, 07:43

Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer

Post by p4p1 »

It is hard with some guys knowing exactly when their prime is when you factor in age vs experience
dempseyfire
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5534
Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56

Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer

Post by dempseyfire »

First thought is Klitschko by late TKO. Could see Wlad with a decision win though since Moorer could bang and Wlad would fight his usual scaredy-cat style vs anyone with the ability to hurt him, and Moorer isn't any smaller than Ibragimov. But Moorer had slow feet and wouldn't cut the distance down enough to do any significant damage. In any case a clear Klitschko win.
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15173
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer

Post by Ambling Alp II »

p4p1 wrote:It is hard with some guys knowing exactly when their prime is when you factor in age vs experience
If you are thinking that he was a better fighter in his 30s that is not the case. He has been been feasting on even weaker opponents in the last several years. His best performances were during his 20s.

He has learned to minimize his flaws somewhat (glass jaw and poor stamina) and is better handling what to do when hurt. However, he has declined considerably offensively.

He was no green rookie when he got stopped earlier in his career anyway.
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer

Post by Rover »

p4p1 wrote:
Crease wrote:Wlad at the high of his power would probably decision Moorer in my opinion.
I gotta think if old man Foreman could time Moorer then Wlad could not to mention he would probably be beating the piss out of Moorer before knocking him out.
Yeah, I doubt this goes to the cards.
tennessee
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 350
Joined: 16 Sep 2004, 23:32

Re: Wlad vs . Michael Moorer

Post by tennessee »

Moorer could of done same as Chambers and Brock.
Post Reply