Fwank should tell him straight

Datsue
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by Datsue »

SNG wrote:
los2 wrote: you will be sick when brook beats the fighter who finished ricky.....
When is Brook fighting Manny Pacqauio then?

:D
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23190
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by mickey1975 »

los2 wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:
Parson Cross wrote:Only on here could a thread about Clev turn into a pop about Brook.
Mickey -I thought you'd learnt your lesson ?!?
:zzz:
I will never learn! I didn't start it this time either. Clev got beaten up by a banger, it happens, no need for him to write "an open letter" about it. It could easily happen to Kell. It happened to Herol and Ricky, two much better fighters than Kell will ever be.
you will be sick when brook beats the fighter who finished ricky.....
If that's going to be Kell's claim to fame then he's in bigger trouble than I thought. Carl Baker beat the man who beat Mike Tyson, you know...
los2
Cruiserweight
Posts: 454
Joined: 30 May 2011, 04:38

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by los2 »

mickey1975 wrote:
If that's going to be Kell's claim to fame then he's in bigger trouble than I thought. Carl Baker beat the man who beat Mike Tyson, you know...
u thought kell's in trouble?....but then u were the only one on here who took fw's 100k offer seriously....... :lol: :lol:
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23190
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by mickey1975 »

los2 wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:
If that's going to be Kell's claim to fame then he's in bigger trouble than I thought. Carl Baker beat the man who beat Mike Tyson, you know...
u thought kell's in trouble?....but then u were the only one on here who took fw's 100k offer seriously....... :lol: :lol:
You seriously don't think he'd put up 100k to fight Brook? A very winnable fight that would sell out the NEC and get Frankie a higher ranking. Yes, I think he would put it on. I wish he would and I could make a fortune off the deluded Brook fans who seem to think he is heir apparent to Floyd!
los2
Cruiserweight
Posts: 454
Joined: 30 May 2011, 04:38

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by los2 »

chain of events...fw publicises offer for froch to fight cleverly....hearn says big fight coming for brook....senchenko announced.....fw publicises 100k offer to brook......1 week later fw claims that senchenko is on 100k+........only one boxrec poster taken in by all this......david barnes announced as opponent...... :yay: :yay: :yay:
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by DMA1987 »

mickey1975 wrote:
los2 wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:
If that's going to be Kell's claim to fame then he's in bigger trouble than I thought. Carl Baker beat the man who beat Mike Tyson, you know...
u thought kell's in trouble?....but then u were the only one on here who took fw's 100k offer seriously....... :lol: :lol:
You seriously don't think he'd put up 100k to fight Brook? A very winnable fight that would sell out the NEC and get Frankie a higher ranking. Yes, I think he would put it on. I wish he would and I could make a fortune off the deluded Brook fans who seem to think he is heir apparent to Floyd!
You are the bang same with Frankie. Can you not see that?

He would not need to be heir apparent to Floyd to beat Gavin, whose best win is still Denton Vassell.
los2
Cruiserweight
Posts: 454
Joined: 30 May 2011, 04:38

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by los2 »

and i cant find vassell on here.....http://ringtv.craveonline.com/ratings/welterweight

:lol: :lol: :lol:
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23190
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by mickey1975 »

And please, after weeks and weeks of asking, can someone please tell me Brook's best win? And who said I was taken in by the offer? I said it would make sense. I didn't even read or here anything about the offer except on here.
TJ77
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1352
Joined: 19 Sep 2010, 13:01

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by TJ77 »

It is farcical that Brook was even mentioned on this thread.
I wrote a jokey post depicting a conversation allegedly might have with Cleverly.
He is dull and there's not much anyone can really say of interest about him.
He did over achieve he has found his level after being protected.
Im not really slagging him just stating facts.
Re Brook he was accused unjustly of being scared of Alexander.
He wasn't he was injured.
The fact he is brought into this debate shows just how much some people get off slagging him at every opportunity.
Gavin does not deserve a shot at Brook he delayed his own career by munching pies washed down with lard.
Now he's on the slim fast and wants to take a short cut unlucky funtime the ship has sailed.
Chambers2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6499
Joined: 24 Feb 2004, 07:24

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by Chambers2 »

TJ77 wrote:Nathey
Its been great you have achieved more than anyone could of expected given your bland persona and limited skill set.
My match making skills have protected you and god knows I've used every smoke and mirror trick in my considerable arsenal of trickery to make you seem interesting.
Your not Nathan your just not not as a boxer mate maybe in the maths world they will be blown away by your charisma
but the boxing fans they've got our number.
Fact is my ol son that Ruski has done us both a big favour that's why I planned it.
Surely even your bored of the whole great pretender routine.
You only have to look at the ticket sales you do the math.
Im gonna miss losing money on shows and trying to decipher WTF your old man is whittering on about on behind those f.ucking
bins he insists on wearing indoors at the presser's.
Thank eff I had Joe or you really could of fucked me up with the Welsh.
Take a long holiday and delete my number.
Yeah and don't worry you'll get your money I promise.

WTF!!! You been on the crack-pipe TJ
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23190
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by mickey1975 »

TJ77 wrote:It is farcical that Brook was even mentioned on this thread.
I wrote a jokey post depicting a conversation allegedly might have with Cleverly.
He is dull and there's not much anyone can really say of interest about him.
He did over achieve he has found his level after being protected.
Im not really slagging him just stating facts.
Re Brook he was accused unjustly of being scared of Alexander.
He wasn't he was injured.
The fact he is brought into this debate shows just how much some people get off slagging him at every opportunity.
Gavin does not deserve a shot at Brook he delayed his own career by munching pies washed down with lard.
Now he's on the slim fast and wants to take a short cut unlucky funtime the ship has sailed.
How has the ship sailed when he has already achieved more than Brook, am and pro, and Kell is still on the pies? Five years after been the next big thing he is taking on a Malignaggi victim in his coming out fight!
TJ77
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1352
Joined: 19 Sep 2010, 13:01

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by TJ77 »

mickey1975 wrote:And please, after weeks and weeks of asking, can someone please tell me Brook's best win? And who said I was taken in by the offer? I said it would make sense. I didn't even read or here anything about the offer except on here.
The best so far probably Hatton or Saldivia.
Que you a saying Hatton's wank and Saldivia is wanker.
We acknowledge that he needs better opponents if only to shut the likes of you up.
Keep believing its all hype and he will be exposed.
TJ77
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1352
Joined: 19 Sep 2010, 13:01

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by TJ77 »

SNG wrote:
columbo wrote:
Parson Cross wrote:Only on here could a thread about Clev turn into a pop about Brook.
Mickey -I thought you'd learnt your lesson ?!?
:zzz:
Only because the person in question doesnt like Brook being criticised so it's a bit hypocritical to take pops at Cleverly after his loss to Kovalev.
This is it exactly. He throws his toys out of the pram at legitimate criticism of Brook and then writes this! Cleverly was beaten by a better fighter, no shame in that, why take the piss out of him?
When the criticism is legitimate I accept it .
Thus far it hasnt really been.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23190
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by mickey1975 »

TJ77 wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:And please, after weeks and weeks of asking, can someone please tell me Brook's best win? And who said I was taken in by the offer? I said it would make sense. I didn't even read or here anything about the offer except on here.
The best so far probably Hatton or Saldivia.
Que you a saying Hatton's wank and Saldivia is wanker.
We acknowledge that he needs better opponents if only to shut the likes of you up.
Keep believing its all hype and he will be exposed.
You have said it all for me regarding the opponents. Look, I have no problem with you or Kell, boxing is about opinions and mine is Gavin would beat Brook. Sky annoy me with the hype more than anyone but they have gone very quiet regarding him recently. I think Eddie has done a brilliant job with him, as I have said before, the only time I have seen both live on the same bill Gavin must have outsold Kell four to one and he was in his third fight, Kell was British champ(and closer to home).
TJ77
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1352
Joined: 19 Sep 2010, 13:01

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by TJ77 »

Chambers2 wrote:
TJ77 wrote:Nathey
Its been great you have achieved more than anyone could of expected given your bland persona and limited skill set.
My match making skills have protected you and god knows I've used every smoke and mirror trick in my considerable arsenal of trickery to make you seem interesting.
Your not Nathan your just not not as a boxer mate maybe in the maths world they will be blown away by your charisma
but the boxing fans they've got our number.
Fact is my ol son that Ruski has done us both a big favour that's why I planned it.
Surely even your bored of the whole great pretender routine.
You only have to look at the ticket sales you do the math.
Im gonna miss losing money on shows and trying to decipher WTF your old man is whittering on about on behind those f.ucking
bins he insists on wearing indoors at the presser's.
Thank eff I had Joe or you really could of fucked me up with the Welsh.
Take a long holiday and delete my number.
Yeah and don't worry you'll get your money I promise.

WTF!!! You been on the crack-pipe TJ
No sir I was bored and if nothing else its elevated that for a time
TJ77
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1352
Joined: 19 Sep 2010, 13:01

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by TJ77 »

mickey1975 wrote:
TJ77 wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:And please, after weeks and weeks of asking, can someone please tell me Brook's best win? And who said I was taken in by the offer? I said it would make sense. I didn't even read or here anything about the offer except on here.
The best so far probably Hatton or Saldivia.
Que you a saying Hatton's wank and Saldivia is wanker.
We acknowledge that he needs better opponents if only to shut the likes of you up.
Keep believing its all hype and he will be exposed.
You have said it all for me regarding the opponents. Look, I have no problem with you or Kell, boxing is about opinions and mine is Gavin would beat Brook. Sky annoy me with the hype more than anyone but they have gone very quiet regarding him recently. I think Eddie has done a brilliant job with him, as I have said before, the only time I have seen both live on the same bill Gavin must have outsold Kell four to one and he was in his third fight, Kell was British champ(and closer to home).
Where and when was the bill? and I have no problem with you mate.
Just your opinions :wink:
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23190
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by mickey1975 »

Khan-Kotelnik at The M.E.N., Brook-Lomax wasn't even shown live as part as the PPV show. Gavin-Fearn was the first fight of the live broadcast.
los2
Cruiserweight
Posts: 454
Joined: 30 May 2011, 04:38

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by los2 »

mickey1975 wrote: How has the ship sailed when he has already achieved more than Brook, am and pro,
:lol: :lol:

where's frankie?

http://ringtv.craveonline.com/ratings/welterweight
los2
Cruiserweight
Posts: 454
Joined: 30 May 2011, 04:38

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by los2 »

mickey1975 wrote:Khan-Kotelnik at The M.E.N., Brook-Lomax wasn't even shown live as part as the PPV show. Gavin-Fearn was the first fight of the live broadcast.
and your point is?.......since gavin beat vassell u have turned against brook and behaved like a child....because u love gavin and fury do you have to abuse brook?......i see a theme developing....i bet u loved henry wharton..... :lol:
los2
Cruiserweight
Posts: 454
Joined: 30 May 2011, 04:38

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by los2 »

TJ77 wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:And please, after weeks and weeks of asking, can someone please tell me Brook's best win? And who said I was taken in by the offer? I said it would make sense. I didn't even read or here anything about the offer except on here.
The best so far probably Hatton or Saldivia.
Que you a saying Hatton's wank and Saldivia is wanker.
We acknowledge that he needs better opponents if only to shut the likes of you up.
Keep believing its all hype and he will be exposed.
brook has worked his way thru world title eliminators..... as has been pointed out countless times jennings, ndou and hatton all boxed for world titles.....hatton was an undefeated european champ...hatton rated brook higher than alvarez.....here's the ring ratings.....http://ringtv.craveonline.com/ratings/w ... t......who cares if a taxi driver rates beating darius vassell higher than all this :lol:
los2
Cruiserweight
Posts: 454
Joined: 30 May 2011, 04:38

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by los2 »

DMA1987 wrote:
You are the bang same with Frankie. Can you not see that?

He would not need to be heir apparent to Floyd to beat Gavin, whose best win is still Denton Vassell.
did he see him "lose" to our curtis...... :lol:
Chambers2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6499
Joined: 24 Feb 2004, 07:24

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by Chambers2 »

TJ77 wrote:
Chambers2 wrote: WTF!!! You been on the crack-pipe TJ
No sir I was bored and if nothing else its elevated that for a time
Have a wank next time
Clint Magnum
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 443
Joined: 15 Feb 2012, 11:55

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by Clint Magnum »

A fellow Brit Cleverly loses one fight (to a heavy handed, much avoided world class operator who will surely go onto bigger and better things) and you tear down his career, his personality and slate him as a clueless, boring unskilled fighter who was lucky to be champ and has a poor skill set then say nothing personal you were just having a laugh.
Quality joke mate. Hilarious. What are you gonna do for an encore, eat babies heads on toast?
Last edited by Clint Magnum on 20 Aug 2013, 07:47, edited 1 time in total.
TJ77
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1352
Joined: 19 Sep 2010, 13:01

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by TJ77 »

Chambers2 wrote:
TJ77 wrote:
Chambers2 wrote: WTF!!! You been on the crack-pipe TJ
No sir I was bored and if nothing else its elevated that for a time
Have a wank next time
Theres a thought.
TJ77
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1352
Joined: 19 Sep 2010, 13:01

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by TJ77 »

mickey1975 wrote:Khan-Kotelnik at The M.E.N., Brook-Lomax wasn't even shown live as part as the PPV show. Gavin-Fearn was the first fight of the live broadcast.
I was there and Kell had plenty of support.
A lot of lads from Sheffield went.
Including half of wincobank depending on release dates and good behaviour we hope to have these lads back in the stands soon. :wink:
He was on pretty early and Kell had to sell the tickets himself with all that
eating shite and being out clubbing everynight he did well to train and shift what he did.Assuming FW gave him the same amount of tickets as Frankie which as it was a title fight and Fw had no time for Brook and was at the time in love with Gavin I doubt he did get same allocation.
Gavin may have at that time had more support he was/is a good young fighter and comes across well.
Brook has no need for Gavin that said Khan has no need for Brook and Haye none for Fury.
If it makes money sense it could happen down the road and who knows if they fought know Gavin would lose IMHO.
Last edited by TJ77 on 20 Aug 2013, 08:11, edited 2 times in total.
Post Reply