Bob Foster v Michael Moorer

Post Reply
Roco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 750
Joined: 20 May 2008, 07:30

Bob Foster v Michael Moorer

Post by Roco »

Again at Light Heavy - what happens?
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11173
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Bob Foster v Michael Moorer

Post by Ezzard »

Moorer must have been pretty dried out to make the weight. A devastating puncher... But against these seasoned greats he's going to need to get mightily lucky.
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15695
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Bob Foster v Michael Moorer

Post by elmersalsa »

Ezzard wrote:Moorer must have been pretty dried out to make the weight. A devastating puncher... But against these seasoned greats he's going to need to get mightily lucky.
x2
SenorPipino
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6055
Joined: 09 Jan 2013, 19:40

Re: Bob Foster v Michael Moorer

Post by SenorPipino »

Moorer's chin was less than stellar.

Lanky Foster catches him early and takes out Moorer within 3 rounds.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46517
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Bob Foster v Michael Moorer

Post by gilgamesh »

SenorPipino wrote:Moorer's chin was less than stellar.

Lanky Foster catches him early and takes out Moorer within 3 rounds.
I don't know about within 3 rounds, but I do agree Foster takes out Moorer at some point in the fight.
Nile4000
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7182
Joined: 17 Sep 2005, 15:21

Re: Bob Foster v Michael Moorer

Post by Nile4000 »

When Bob has a point to prove, he does it in devastating fashion.And it would happen here, with Michael.Foster coldcocks Moorer in TWO rounds.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Bob Foster v Michael Moorer

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Foster's chin wasn't the best either. He's probably the most overrated Light heavyweight champion in my estimation.That being said, Moorer did next to nothing in the weight class. He would be dangerous, but I reckon Foster could navigate his way through early trouble and win by decision or late stoppage.
fatcity69
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 419
Joined: 11 May 2008, 16:18

Re: Bob Foster v Michael Moorer

Post by fatcity69 »

Foster overrated?.. are you joking. When was fosters chin ever found wanting at 175?. Just because he was stopped by great heavyweights Ali and Frazier doesn't make him chinny. Not many lightheavies could make it at heavy and Foster was unfortunate to be around when the heavyweight division was stacked with talent.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Bob Foster v Michael Moorer

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

fatcity69 wrote:Foster overrated?.. are you joking. When was fosters chin ever found wanting at 175?. Just because he was stopped by great heavyweights Ali and Frazier doesn't make him chinny. Not many lightheavies could make it at heavy and Foster was unfortunate to be around when the heavyweight division was stacked with talent.
I couldn't be more serious. I see him ranked #1 by some people and I can't see a case for him being in the top 10 of such a stacked division. I doubt he'd be in my Top 15.

I never called him chinny, no need to exaggerate. Moorer's chin was never lacking at 175 either. They both didn't face high caliber opposition there. Bob's was obviously superior, but not all-time stuff and not big punchers.
dr_devious
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5349
Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 09:19

Re: Bob Foster v Michael Moorer

Post by dr_devious »

Foster smashes Moorer, inside 3 rounds. Too big a punch
Post Reply