frampton ...looks good but needs more head movement.....
frampton ...looks good but needs more head movement.....
...as soon as i post it he moves his head in the 5th ................
Re: frampton ...looks good but needs more head movement.....
I thought he was a bit square on at times too, quigg would test him, big time.
Re: frampton ...looks good but needs more head movement.....
I think Frampton would knock Quigg out. I think it would be a close fight up to that point though.rhino222 wrote:I thought he was a bit square on at times too, quigg would test him, big time.
Re: frampton ...looks good but needs more head movement.....
in my opinion frampton is a level ahead of quigg and would be a big favourite with the bookies if they ever fight
i think frampton would stop him late in the fight
i think frampton would stop him late in the fight
Re: frampton ...looks good but needs more head movement.....
They're always shouting at Frampton to move the head more. He has it in his locker but just needs to do it more, especially when he boxes the elite.
Re: frampton ...looks good but needs more head movement.....
Frampton s the real deal going to big a big star soon
-
Fergz16COTJ
- Middleweight
- Posts: 75
- Joined: 21 Oct 2013, 06:47
Re: frampton ...looks good but needs more head movement.....
The Jackal can do the lot, he'll destroy Scott Quigg, he'll win the IBF Super-Bantamweight title in his next couple of fights,...his real big test would come in the shape of LSC for me..
Re: frampton ...looks good but needs more head movement.....
Out of curiousity Michael, how do you think you would of fared against Frampton and Quigg? In your prime I mean obviously.tear up wrote:Frampton s the real deal going to big a big star soon
Re: frampton ...looks good but needs more head movement.....
I like Frampton but don't necessarily think he'd "destroy" Quigg at all! Quigg looked awesome V Munroe, a hardened Euro level pro. Frampton looked every bit as good against Kiko who is now World champ but I wouldn't consider him to be much better than Rendall. I think out of all the potential British bust ups, this would be the closest.
Re: frampton ...looks good but needs more head movement.....
Yeah but Monroe wasnt quite the same fighter that he was when he beat Martinez and co when he fought Quigg. He's nearer the end of his career now. Also stylisticly he was never a huge threat as he doesnt have much pop and he's not the greatest "boxer".danamba7 wrote:I like Frampton but don't necessarily think he'd "destroy" Quigg at all! Quigg looked awesome V Munroe, a hardened Euro level pro. Frampton looked every bit as good against Kiko who is now World champ but I wouldn't consider him to be much better than Rendall. I think out of all the potential British bust ups, this would be the closest.
-
Roars Like Me
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1763
- Joined: 14 Feb 2006, 10:43
Re: frampton ...looks good but needs more head movement.....
To be fair I bet he will move his head when he's in with the big boys. When you are winning well, as in this fight you don't have to do everything to win.
A few taps from a top class fighter and he'll look like early Tyson all of a sudden.
A few taps from a top class fighter and he'll look like early Tyson all of a sudden.
Re: frampton ...looks good but needs more head movement.....
Frampton looks very good, his hands are fast and he hits hard, he seems to enjoy his boxing as well; I hope he grabs a title and he and Quigg face off next summer, that will be some fight.
Re: frampton ...looks good but needs more head movement.....
i think your right he did what he had to do ,i'm sure if it was a harder puncher he was facing he would be a bit more elusive .Roars Like Me wrote:To be fair I bet he will move his head when he's in with the big boys. When you are winning well, as in this fight you don't have to do everything to win.
A few taps from a top class fighter and he'll look like early Tyson all of a sudden.
Re: frampton ...looks good but needs more head movement.....
who's tear up ! micheal gomez?columbo wrote:Out of curiousity Michael, how do you think you would of fared against Frampton and Quigg? In your prime I mean obviously.tear up wrote:Frampton s the real deal going to big a big star soon
Re: frampton ...looks good but needs more head movement.....
Michael Hunterstevedoc wrote:who's tear up ! micheal gomez?columbo wrote:Out of curiousity Michael, how do you think you would of fared against Frampton and Quigg? In your prime I mean obviously.tear up wrote:Frampton s the real deal going to big a big star soon
Re: frampton ...looks good but needs more head movement.....
wow micheal hunter great boxer ....stevedoc wrote:who's tear up ! micheal gomez?columbo wrote:Out of curiousity Michael, how do you think you would of fared against Frampton and Quigg? In your prime I mean obviously.tear up wrote:Frampton s the real deal going to big a big star soon
Re: frampton ...looks good but needs more head movement.....
Framptons style is effective abit pro-am which can't really be changed to much. His chin ain't on his chest & he don't bob forward like mcguigan he has a more lean back style to pull back & counter abit upright but it's effective & works
-
Fergz16COTJ
- Middleweight
- Posts: 75
- Joined: 21 Oct 2013, 06:47
Re: frampton ...looks good but needs more head movement.....
No one has done what Frampton did and that's KO Kiko... His chin is solid, Kiko can bang and Frampton walked through his punches.. on a separate note..I think stylistically Kiko would be a nightmare for Quigg to handle.. and i'm not sure about Quigg's ability to take a solid punch after Jamie Arthur who is not a big hitter and hits nowhere near as hard as Frampton put Quigg on his backsidedanamba7 wrote:I like Frampton but don't necessarily think he'd "destroy" Quigg at all! Quigg looked awesome V Munroe, a hardened Euro level pro. Frampton looked every bit as good against Kiko who is now World champ but I wouldn't consider him to be much better than Rendall. I think out of all the potential British bust ups, this would be the closest.