frampton ...looks good but needs more head movement.....

Post Reply
stevedoc
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3550
Joined: 24 May 2013, 07:40

frampton ...looks good but needs more head movement.....

Post by stevedoc »

...as soon as i post it he moves his head in the 5th ................
rhino222
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6618
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 09:38

Re: frampton ...looks good but needs more head movement.....

Post by rhino222 »

I thought he was a bit square on at times too, quigg would test him, big time.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: frampton ...looks good but needs more head movement.....

Post by lefty »

rhino222 wrote:I thought he was a bit square on at times too, quigg would test him, big time.
I think Frampton would knock Quigg out. I think it would be a close fight up to that point though.
mullenman
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1124
Joined: 23 Oct 2012, 11:10

Re: frampton ...looks good but needs more head movement.....

Post by mullenman »

in my opinion frampton is a level ahead of quigg and would be a big favourite with the bookies if they ever fight

i think frampton would stop him late in the fight
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9661
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Re: frampton ...looks good but needs more head movement.....

Post by steve689 »

They're always shouting at Frampton to move the head more. He has it in his locker but just needs to do it more, especially when he boxes the elite.
tear up
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1832
Joined: 06 Dec 2010, 12:25

Re: frampton ...looks good but needs more head movement.....

Post by tear up »

Frampton s the real deal going to big a big star soon
Fergz16COTJ
Middleweight
Posts: 75
Joined: 21 Oct 2013, 06:47

Re: frampton ...looks good but needs more head movement.....

Post by Fergz16COTJ »

The Jackal can do the lot, he'll destroy Scott Quigg, he'll win the IBF Super-Bantamweight title in his next couple of fights,...his real big test would come in the shape of LSC for me..
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: frampton ...looks good but needs more head movement.....

Post by lefty »

tear up wrote:Frampton s the real deal going to big a big star soon
Out of curiousity Michael, how do you think you would of fared against Frampton and Quigg? In your prime I mean obviously.
danamba7
Middleweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 30 Sep 2013, 09:30

Re: frampton ...looks good but needs more head movement.....

Post by danamba7 »

I like Frampton but don't necessarily think he'd "destroy" Quigg at all! Quigg looked awesome V Munroe, a hardened Euro level pro. Frampton looked every bit as good against Kiko who is now World champ but I wouldn't consider him to be much better than Rendall. I think out of all the potential British bust ups, this would be the closest.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: frampton ...looks good but needs more head movement.....

Post by lefty »

danamba7 wrote:I like Frampton but don't necessarily think he'd "destroy" Quigg at all! Quigg looked awesome V Munroe, a hardened Euro level pro. Frampton looked every bit as good against Kiko who is now World champ but I wouldn't consider him to be much better than Rendall. I think out of all the potential British bust ups, this would be the closest.
Yeah but Monroe wasnt quite the same fighter that he was when he beat Martinez and co when he fought Quigg. He's nearer the end of his career now. Also stylisticly he was never a huge threat as he doesnt have much pop and he's not the greatest "boxer".
Roars Like Me
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1763
Joined: 14 Feb 2006, 10:43

Re: frampton ...looks good but needs more head movement.....

Post by Roars Like Me »

To be fair I bet he will move his head when he's in with the big boys. When you are winning well, as in this fight you don't have to do everything to win.

A few taps from a top class fighter and he'll look like early Tyson all of a sudden.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: frampton ...looks good but needs more head movement.....

Post by palooka »

Frampton looks very good, his hands are fast and he hits hard, he seems to enjoy his boxing as well; I hope he grabs a title and he and Quigg face off next summer, that will be some fight.
stevedoc
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3550
Joined: 24 May 2013, 07:40

Re: frampton ...looks good but needs more head movement.....

Post by stevedoc »

Roars Like Me wrote:To be fair I bet he will move his head when he's in with the big boys. When you are winning well, as in this fight you don't have to do everything to win.

A few taps from a top class fighter and he'll look like early Tyson all of a sudden.
i think your right he did what he had to do ,i'm sure if it was a harder puncher he was facing he would be a bit more elusive .
stevedoc
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3550
Joined: 24 May 2013, 07:40

Re: frampton ...looks good but needs more head movement.....

Post by stevedoc »

columbo wrote:
tear up wrote:Frampton s the real deal going to big a big star soon
Out of curiousity Michael, how do you think you would of fared against Frampton and Quigg? In your prime I mean obviously.
who's tear up ! micheal gomez?
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: frampton ...looks good but needs more head movement.....

Post by palooka »

stevedoc wrote:
columbo wrote:
tear up wrote:Frampton s the real deal going to big a big star soon
Out of curiousity Michael, how do you think you would of fared against Frampton and Quigg? In your prime I mean obviously.
who's tear up ! micheal gomez?
Michael Hunter
stevedoc
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3550
Joined: 24 May 2013, 07:40

Re: frampton ...looks good but needs more head movement.....

Post by stevedoc »

stevedoc wrote:
columbo wrote:
tear up wrote:Frampton s the real deal going to big a big star soon
Out of curiousity Michael, how do you think you would of fared against Frampton and Quigg? In your prime I mean obviously.
who's tear up ! micheal gomez?
wow micheal hunter great boxer ....
hurlock
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5687
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 04:23

Re: frampton ...looks good but needs more head movement.....

Post by hurlock »

Framptons style is effective abit pro-am which can't really be changed to much. His chin ain't on his chest & he don't bob forward like mcguigan he has a more lean back style to pull back & counter abit upright but it's effective & works
Fergz16COTJ
Middleweight
Posts: 75
Joined: 21 Oct 2013, 06:47

Re: frampton ...looks good but needs more head movement.....

Post by Fergz16COTJ »

danamba7 wrote:I like Frampton but don't necessarily think he'd "destroy" Quigg at all! Quigg looked awesome V Munroe, a hardened Euro level pro. Frampton looked every bit as good against Kiko who is now World champ but I wouldn't consider him to be much better than Rendall. I think out of all the potential British bust ups, this would be the closest.
No one has done what Frampton did and that's KO Kiko... His chin is solid, Kiko can bang and Frampton walked through his punches.. on a separate note..I think stylistically Kiko would be a nightmare for Quigg to handle.. and i'm not sure about Quigg's ability to take a solid punch after Jamie Arthur who is not a big hitter and hits nowhere near as hard as Frampton put Quigg on his backside
Post Reply