Groves loses case against Booth
Re: Groves loses case against Booth
Booth will watch the fight a week on sat thinking this is the best bit of cash he has ever earned. Always comes down to money, shame Booth couldn't just let Groves go and wish him all the best for the fight.
Re: Groves loses case against Booth
I'm seriously peed off about this as I fancied Groves causing a big upset but this is bound to affect his preparations. Balls!
Booth must be loaded.
Booth must be loaded.
-
The Insider
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 2581
- Joined: 26 Mar 2012, 11:21
Re: Groves loses case against Booth
Has this been heard in court or just in front of the Southern Area Council? Not sure what the Board decide will have any bearing on who actually gets what.
Re: Groves loses case against Booth
I would assume that the matter is more of a legal one than the board ....however what will the board make of the situation when booth appears in the corner come fight night ...... 
-
sweetscience
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2816
- Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09
Re: Groves loses case against Booth
Still think its bollocks
And what is that tripe about early PPV figures
NO ONE I repeat NO ONE buys a PPV 2 week in advance ... Is it even possible ?
And what is that tripe about early PPV figures
NO ONE I repeat NO ONE buys a PPV 2 week in advance ... Is it even possible ?
Re: Groves loses case against Booth
Will groves, now pull out of the fight?????
Re: Groves loses case against Booth
I dont know what the issue is really. Booth was Groves's manager when this fight was arranged so surely he deserves his 25%? I imagine he played a big part in the negotiations and the final amount Groves got offered for the bout.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23192
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Groves loses case against Booth
It is. Sky are hammering the promotion here. I don't even think Haye-Fury had this much.sweetscience wrote:Still think its bollocks
And what is that tripe about early PPV figures
NO ONE I repeat NO ONE buys a PPV 2 week in advance ... Is it even possible ?
Re: Groves loses case against Booth
X2 you will probably find that the southern area just enforced the boxer/manager contract which both parties signed so personally I don't see what the issue is coz board contracts are there to protect the interests of both parties and it is not easy to walk away from a board contractcolumbo wrote:I dont know what the issue is really. Booth was Groves's manager when this fight was arranged so surely he deserves his 25%? I imagine he played a big part in the negotiations and the final amount Groves got offered for the bout.
-
Parson Cross
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1991
- Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57
Re: Groves loses case against Booth
Now that the Board has adjudicated either party has the right to pursue a civil action.
Re: Groves loses case against Booth
Parson Cross wrote:Now that the Board has adjudicated either party has the right to pursue a civil action.
Yes they could go down that route but first they can appeal to the board stewards of appeal and not pre empting the outcome will almost certainly back the decision of the southern area council unless groves can prove that booth has failed in his duties as a manager
-
Black Sam Bellamy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1476
- Joined: 25 Sep 2008, 13:51
Re: Groves loses case against Booth
Would anyone be surprised if this all turned out to be a work ?
Re: Groves loses case against Booth
It would be a very organised and elaborate work and for them to even attempt it would mean that they really thought Froch was susceptible to games etc, all this takes a lot of effort so they'd have to be sure that it'd have a pay off.Black Sam Bellamy wrote:Would anyone be surprised if this all turned out to be a work ?
There's been a few posters here that have said that they gave Groves a good chance before the split and without Booth - no chance; if it were a work maybe they imagine Froch would skimp a little in training though with McCracken I don't think that would happen.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23192
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Groves loses case against Booth
Isn't Carl sparring Luke Blackledge in Sheffield tonight?
Re: Groves loses case against Booth
Has Booth got a dagger in his hand?G0mez wrote:
Re: Groves loses case against Booth
Yes Mickey, as well as Darren Barker, Kelvin Young and Callum Smith - plus others here and there.mickey1975 wrote:Isn't Carl sparring Luke Blackledge in Sheffield tonight?
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23192
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Groves loses case against Booth
I have mutual friends with Luke. Good work for him. Really tough lad, apparently, only young as well. I think he would have given smith a test.G0mez wrote:Yes Mickey, as well as Darren Barker, Kelvin Young and Callum Smith - plus others here and there.mickey1975 wrote:Isn't Carl sparring Luke Blackledge in Sheffield tonight?
-
Teddy's Toupee
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 2903
- Joined: 25 Sep 2010, 17:37
Re: Groves loses case against Booth
He's got a snaggle tooth just like yours, palooka.palooka wrote:Has Booth got a dagger in his hand?G0mez wrote:
-
Manchester Hitman
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 1263
- Joined: 23 Aug 2012, 15:56
Re: Groves loses case against Booth
Fcuks sake Booth you slimmy pudendum - couldn't this shite have waited Untill after the fight
Re: Groves loses case against Booth
Why should he? If he still has legit management contract/role in place then he's due his cut. Why wait until later and maybe risk losing it. Could also be a way of getting in early and levering Groves and any representatives in to playing ball rather than risk a drag on the preparations?Manchester Hitman wrote:Fcuks sake Booth you slimmy pudendum - couldn't this shite have waited Untill after the fight
-
The Insider
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 2581
- Joined: 26 Mar 2012, 11:21
Re: Groves loses case against Booth
Board contracts look like they are a piece if piss to walk away from of late if you've got the right bloke in your corner (ala rumpole etc). Now walking away without paying is another thing.....spudder56 wrote: board contracts are there to protect the interests of both parties and it is not easy to walk away from a board contract
Re: Groves loses case against Booth
I know Booth divides people's thoughts on forums.
But looking at this black and white, the guy has been there throughout all of the poor opponents that probably had poor purses too - and now GG is having the the "big PPV fight" he gets dropped ?
He drove him around the UK for sparring, all the press conferences and training hours and the title fight is the kickback where you make your money back. I'm sure other trainers understand this and hence the contract to protect all parties.
But looking at this black and white, the guy has been there throughout all of the poor opponents that probably had poor purses too - and now GG is having the the "big PPV fight" he gets dropped ?
He drove him around the UK for sparring, all the press conferences and training hours and the title fight is the kickback where you make your money back. I'm sure other trainers understand this and hence the contract to protect all parties.
