Shawn Porter v Kell Brook
-
Pugilist-specialist
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1632
- Joined: 11 Jul 2008, 04:37
Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook
LOL at people who come onto a boxing forum and complain about spoilers
Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook
Think this would be a better fight than the Alexander one me. Roll on March/April next year.
Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook
If people put spoiler in the title like they fornicating should we can all use the forum when we like. Was lots of fights in the last 24 hours and I was wondering what the general attitude to Barker was.Sorry if I expect a bit of forum decorum.Glass Joe wrote:LOL at people who come onto a boxing forum and complain about spoilers
Your right lets just announce all in our titles and hope everyone already knows everything before coming to the forum.
Shut up you melt.
Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook
Porter looks like a more dangerous opponent for Brook than Alexander did. I wonder if Brook Vs. Porter will actually happen. I suspect more injuries and water treading from Special K.
Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook
See the last sentence of my post above in response to the nonsense your spouting.chad wrote:Porter looks like a more dangerous opponent for Brook than Alexander did. I wonder if Brook Vs. Porter will actually happen. I suspect more injuries and water treading from Special K.
Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook
What a well thought out rounded argument you've presentedTJ77 wrote:See the last sentence of my post above in response to the nonsense your spouting.chad wrote:Porter looks like a more dangerous opponent for Brook than Alexander did. I wonder if Brook Vs. Porter will actually happen. I suspect more injuries and water treading from Special K.
Time will tell if I'm spouting nonsense. Until then keep up the quality banter.
Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook
You saucy bugger youTJ77 wrote:See the last sentence of my post above in response to the nonsense your spouting.chad wrote:Porter looks like a more dangerous opponent for Brook than Alexander did. I wonder if Brook Vs. Porter will actually happen. I suspect more injuries and water treading from Special K.
Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook
On that display from Porter last night Brook looks up against it.
Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook
@chad you insinuate that Brook lost his bottle and feigned injury to duck Alexander and will do the same with Porter.
Hardly a well rounded thought out statement.
Why would Brook have done that ?
His and all talented fighters dream is to win a world title.
Alexander is very beatable and Kell had the chance to do what Porter and Bradley before him have done.
Injury robbed him of that chance that is the simple truth.
He will now get another throw of the dice and I hope he stays injury free and fulfills his potential.
If you present a balanced well rounded argument you will always get one back from me.
Hardly a well rounded thought out statement.
Why would Brook have done that ?
His and all talented fighters dream is to win a world title.
Alexander is very beatable and Kell had the chance to do what Porter and Bradley before him have done.
Injury robbed him of that chance that is the simple truth.
He will now get another throw of the dice and I hope he stays injury free and fulfills his potential.
If you present a balanced well rounded argument you will always get one back from me.
Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook
Porter is all wrong for kell, brook should choose another route he has no inside game!
Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook
Oh great, ducking.BAP1 wrote:Porter is all wrong for kell, brook should choose another route he has no inside game!
Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook
columbo wrote:Oh great, ducking.BAP1 wrote:Porter is all wrong for kell, brook should choose another route he has no inside game!
Don't get me wrong I'd watch the fight, I just think kell would get exposed. Would prefer to see him in against Broner
Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook
Very nice back track. Much better than calling me a melt and telling me to shutTJ77 wrote:@chad you insinuate that Brook lost his bottle and feigned injury to duck Alexander and will do the same with Porter.
Hardly a well rounded thought out statement.
Why would Brook have done that ?
His and all talented fighters dream is to win a world title.
Alexander is very beatable and Kell had the chance to do what Porter and Bradley before him have done.
Injury robbed him of that chance that is the simple truth.
He will now get another throw of the dice and I hope he stays injury free and fulfills his potential.
If you present a balanced well rounded argument you will always get one back from me.
I don't think Brook wants it at all. I think he doubts his talent and doesn't want to get hurt or exposed. Very happy to cruise along at his current level picking up paydays. You have your opinion and I have mine. Clearly we aren't going to agree on this one. Let's just see how the next 6 months or so pan out. I'm sure Brook won't let me, or plenty others who have the same suspicions down.
Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook
No back track your trolling and are a melt as I first thought.chad wrote:Very nice back track. Much better than calling me a melt and telling me to shutTJ77 wrote:@chad you insinuate that Brook lost his bottle and feigned injury to duck Alexander and will do the same with Porter.
Hardly a well rounded thought out statement.
Why would Brook have done that ?
His and all talented fighters dream is to win a world title.
Alexander is very beatable and Kell had the chance to do what Porter and Bradley before him have done.
Injury robbed him of that chance that is the simple truth.
He will now get another throw of the dice and I hope he stays injury free and fulfills his potential.
If you present a balanced well rounded argument you will always get one back from me.
I don't think Brook wants it at all. I think he doubts his talent and doesn't want to get hurt or exposed. Very happy to cruise along at his current level picking up paydays. You have your opinion and I have mine. Clearly we aren't going to agree on this one. Let's just see how the next 6 months or so pan out. I'm sure Brook won't let me, or plenty others who have the same suspicions down.
Your opinion is based on nothing just to heap more shit on a guy who has had enough thrown at him.
Your right give it 6 months and we will see till then save the conspiracy bullshit it helps no one.
-
Yes We Can
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 2087
- Joined: 29 Sep 2010, 17:16
Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook
Where does Porters performance place Amir Kahn?
Both struggled against Diaz, when most believed they had no right to yet porter proved he is top 10 at 147.
Is Diaz better than was presented or just a coincidence?
Both struggled against Diaz, when most believed they had no right to yet porter proved he is top 10 at 147.
Is Diaz better than was presented or just a coincidence?
-
Pugilist-specialist
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1632
- Joined: 11 Jul 2008, 04:37
Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook
Kell has a young child and was looking at moving house with the money from the Alexander fight. To suggest he feigned injury is idiotic.chad wrote:Very nice back track. Much better than calling me a melt and telling me to shutTJ77 wrote:@chad you insinuate that Brook lost his bottle and feigned injury to duck Alexander and will do the same with Porter.
Hardly a well rounded thought out statement.
Why would Brook have done that ?
His and all talented fighters dream is to win a world title.
Alexander is very beatable and Kell had the chance to do what Porter and Bradley before him have done.
Injury robbed him of that chance that is the simple truth.
He will now get another throw of the dice and I hope he stays injury free and fulfills his potential.
If you present a balanced well rounded argument you will always get one back from me.
I don't think Brook wants it at all. I think he doubts his talent and doesn't want to get hurt or exposed. Very happy to cruise along at his current level picking up paydays. You have your opinion and I have mine. Clearly we aren't going to agree on this one. Let's just see how the next 6 months or so pan out. I'm sure Brook won't let me, or plenty others who have the same suspicions down.
Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook
Clearly I've not won you overTJ77 wrote:No back track your trolling and are a melt as I first thought.
Your opinion is based on nothing just to heap more poo on a guy who has had enough thrown at him.
Your right give it 6 months and we will see till then save the conspiracy bullshit it helps no one.
Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook
Occasionally you let your mask slip. Just stick to posting allegedly updates mate, you are sh*t at boxing.chad wrote:Porter looks like a more dangerous opponent for Brook than Alexander did. I wonder if Brook Vs. Porter will actually happen. I suspect more injuries and water treading from Special K.
Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook
DMA1987 wrote:Occasionally you let your mask slip.chad wrote:Porter looks like a more dangerous opponent for Brook than Alexander did. I wonder if Brook Vs. Porter will actually happen. I suspect more injuries and water treading from Special K.
If I did work for allegedly I'd have better things to do with my Sundays, like worrying about keeping subscribers during the barren Christmas TV schedule, instead of being called a melt by a total stranger on a forum
-
Final round
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02
Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook
Some performance by Porter, he couldn't miss Alexander last night and on that form he'd be a really tough nights work for Kell Brook.
TBF though that was by far the best I've seen Porter fight, he really rose to the occasion.
TBF though that was by far the best I've seen Porter fight, he really rose to the occasion.
Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook
That was a sneaky addition to your original post you rascalDMA1987 wrote:Occasionally you let your mask slip. Just stick to posting Allegedly channel updates mate, you are sh*t at boxing.chad wrote:Porter looks like a more dangerous opponent for Brook than Alexander did. I wonder if Brook Vs. Porter will actually happen. I suspect more injuries and water treading from Special K.
Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook
Im not in the business of calling people names for nowt.
Slag Kell when its not justified I will call you a melt.
Its not been easy for him or us and I really hope he wins you over.
No offence meant really im sure your sound just stop making silly statements and I will stop the silly name calling.
Slag Kell when its not justified I will call you a melt.
Its not been easy for him or us and I really hope he wins you over.
No offence meant really im sure your sound just stop making silly statements and I will stop the silly name calling.
-
ShadrachSimmo
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4738
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42
Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook
Porter and Khan both took Diaz lightly expecting to beat him easily I think.funtime wrote:Where does Porters performance place Amir Kahn?
Both struggled against Diaz, when most believed they had no right to yet porter proved he is top 10 at 147.
Is Diaz better than was presented or just a coincidence?
But "The Kidd" was a good fighter in his day and still is when the mood takes him as both found out.