Shawn Porter v Kell Brook

TJ77
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1352
Joined: 19 Sep 2010, 13:01

Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook

Post by TJ77 »

SPOILER
Glass Joe
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5029
Joined: 08 Feb 2012, 10:29

Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook

Post by Glass Joe »

LOL at people who come onto a boxing forum and complain about spoilers
bigB
Cruiserweight
Posts: 470
Joined: 24 Dec 2010, 08:13

Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook

Post by bigB »

Think this would be a better fight than the Alexander one me. Roll on March/April next year.
TJ77
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1352
Joined: 19 Sep 2010, 13:01

Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook

Post by TJ77 »

Glass Joe wrote:LOL at people who come onto a boxing forum and complain about spoilers
If people put spoiler in the title like they fornicating should we can all use the forum when we like. Was lots of fights in the last 24 hours and I was wondering what the general attitude to Barker was.Sorry if I expect a bit of forum decorum.
Your right lets just announce all in our titles and hope everyone already knows everything before coming to the forum.
Shut up you melt.
chad
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1806
Joined: 22 Sep 2011, 13:52

Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook

Post by chad »

Porter looks like a more dangerous opponent for Brook than Alexander did. I wonder if Brook Vs. Porter will actually happen. I suspect more injuries and water treading from Special K.
TJ77
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1352
Joined: 19 Sep 2010, 13:01

Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook

Post by TJ77 »

chad wrote:Porter looks like a more dangerous opponent for Brook than Alexander did. I wonder if Brook Vs. Porter will actually happen. I suspect more injuries and water treading from Special K.
See the last sentence of my post above in response to the nonsense your spouting.
chad
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1806
Joined: 22 Sep 2011, 13:52

Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook

Post by chad »

TJ77 wrote:
chad wrote:Porter looks like a more dangerous opponent for Brook than Alexander did. I wonder if Brook Vs. Porter will actually happen. I suspect more injuries and water treading from Special K.
See the last sentence of my post above in response to the nonsense your spouting.
What a well thought out rounded argument you've presented :lol:

Time will tell if I'm spouting nonsense. Until then keep up the quality banter.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook

Post by lefty »

TJ77 wrote:
chad wrote:Porter looks like a more dangerous opponent for Brook than Alexander did. I wonder if Brook Vs. Porter will actually happen. I suspect more injuries and water treading from Special K.
See the last sentence of my post above in response to the nonsense your spouting.
You saucy bugger you :wink:
Kilburn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6722
Joined: 25 Jul 2002, 07:27

Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook

Post by Kilburn »

On that display from Porter last night Brook looks up against it.
TJ77
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1352
Joined: 19 Sep 2010, 13:01

Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook

Post by TJ77 »

@chad you insinuate that Brook lost his bottle and feigned injury to duck Alexander and will do the same with Porter.
Hardly a well rounded thought out statement.
Why would Brook have done that ?
His and all talented fighters dream is to win a world title.
Alexander is very beatable and Kell had the chance to do what Porter and Bradley before him have done.
Injury robbed him of that chance that is the simple truth.
He will now get another throw of the dice and I hope he stays injury free and fulfills his potential.
If you present a balanced well rounded argument you will always get one back from me.
BAP1
Middleweight
Posts: 162
Joined: 10 Nov 2013, 06:05

Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook

Post by BAP1 »

Porter is all wrong for kell, brook should choose another route he has no inside game!
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook

Post by lefty »

BAP1 wrote:Porter is all wrong for kell, brook should choose another route he has no inside game!
Oh great, ducking.
BAP1
Middleweight
Posts: 162
Joined: 10 Nov 2013, 06:05

Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook

Post by BAP1 »

columbo wrote:
BAP1 wrote:Porter is all wrong for kell, brook should choose another route he has no inside game!
Oh great, ducking.

Don't get me wrong I'd watch the fight, I just think kell would get exposed. Would prefer to see him in against Broner
chad
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1806
Joined: 22 Sep 2011, 13:52

Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook

Post by chad »

TJ77 wrote:@chad you insinuate that Brook lost his bottle and feigned injury to duck Alexander and will do the same with Porter.
Hardly a well rounded thought out statement.
Why would Brook have done that ?
His and all talented fighters dream is to win a world title.
Alexander is very beatable and Kell had the chance to do what Porter and Bradley before him have done.
Injury robbed him of that chance that is the simple truth.
He will now get another throw of the dice and I hope he stays injury free and fulfills his potential.
If you present a balanced well rounded argument you will always get one back from me.
Very nice back track. Much better than calling me a melt and telling me to shut :lol:

I don't think Brook wants it at all. I think he doubts his talent and doesn't want to get hurt or exposed. Very happy to cruise along at his current level picking up paydays. You have your opinion and I have mine. Clearly we aren't going to agree on this one. Let's just see how the next 6 months or so pan out. I'm sure Brook won't let me, or plenty others who have the same suspicions down.
TJ77
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1352
Joined: 19 Sep 2010, 13:01

Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook

Post by TJ77 »

chad wrote:
TJ77 wrote:@chad you insinuate that Brook lost his bottle and feigned injury to duck Alexander and will do the same with Porter.
Hardly a well rounded thought out statement.
Why would Brook have done that ?
His and all talented fighters dream is to win a world title.
Alexander is very beatable and Kell had the chance to do what Porter and Bradley before him have done.
Injury robbed him of that chance that is the simple truth.
He will now get another throw of the dice and I hope he stays injury free and fulfills his potential.
If you present a balanced well rounded argument you will always get one back from me.
Very nice back track. Much better than calling me a melt and telling me to shut :lol:

I don't think Brook wants it at all. I think he doubts his talent and doesn't want to get hurt or exposed. Very happy to cruise along at his current level picking up paydays. You have your opinion and I have mine. Clearly we aren't going to agree on this one. Let's just see how the next 6 months or so pan out. I'm sure Brook won't let me, or plenty others who have the same suspicions down.
No back track your trolling and are a melt as I first thought.
Your opinion is based on nothing just to heap more shit on a guy who has had enough thrown at him.
Your right give it 6 months and we will see till then save the conspiracy bullshit it helps no one.
Yes We Can
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2087
Joined: 29 Sep 2010, 17:16

Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook

Post by Yes We Can »

Where does Porters performance place Amir Kahn?

Both struggled against Diaz, when most believed they had no right to yet porter proved he is top 10 at 147.

Is Diaz better than was presented or just a coincidence?
Pugilist-specialist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1632
Joined: 11 Jul 2008, 04:37

Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook

Post by Pugilist-specialist »

chad wrote:
TJ77 wrote:@chad you insinuate that Brook lost his bottle and feigned injury to duck Alexander and will do the same with Porter.
Hardly a well rounded thought out statement.
Why would Brook have done that ?
His and all talented fighters dream is to win a world title.
Alexander is very beatable and Kell had the chance to do what Porter and Bradley before him have done.
Injury robbed him of that chance that is the simple truth.
He will now get another throw of the dice and I hope he stays injury free and fulfills his potential.
If you present a balanced well rounded argument you will always get one back from me.
Very nice back track. Much better than calling me a melt and telling me to shut :lol:

I don't think Brook wants it at all. I think he doubts his talent and doesn't want to get hurt or exposed. Very happy to cruise along at his current level picking up paydays. You have your opinion and I have mine. Clearly we aren't going to agree on this one. Let's just see how the next 6 months or so pan out. I'm sure Brook won't let me, or plenty others who have the same suspicions down.
Kell has a young child and was looking at moving house with the money from the Alexander fight. To suggest he feigned injury is idiotic.
chad
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1806
Joined: 22 Sep 2011, 13:52

Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook

Post by chad »

TJ77 wrote:No back track your trolling and are a melt as I first thought.
Your opinion is based on nothing just to heap more poo on a guy who has had enough thrown at him.
Your right give it 6 months and we will see till then save the conspiracy bullshit it helps no one.
Clearly I've not won you over :lol:
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook

Post by DMA1987 »

chad wrote:Porter looks like a more dangerous opponent for Brook than Alexander did. I wonder if Brook Vs. Porter will actually happen. I suspect more injuries and water treading from Special K.
Occasionally you let your mask slip. Just stick to posting allegedly updates mate, you are sh*t at boxing.
chad
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1806
Joined: 22 Sep 2011, 13:52

Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook

Post by chad »

DMA1987 wrote:
chad wrote:Porter looks like a more dangerous opponent for Brook than Alexander did. I wonder if Brook Vs. Porter will actually happen. I suspect more injuries and water treading from Special K.
Occasionally you let your mask slip.
:shame:

If I did work for allegedly I'd have better things to do with my Sundays, like worrying about keeping subscribers during the barren Christmas TV schedule, instead of being called a melt by a total stranger on a forum :lol:
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook

Post by Final round »

Some performance by Porter, he couldn't miss Alexander last night and on that form he'd be a really tough nights work for Kell Brook.
TBF though that was by far the best I've seen Porter fight, he really rose to the occasion.
chad
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1806
Joined: 22 Sep 2011, 13:52

Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook

Post by chad »

DMA1987 wrote:
chad wrote:Porter looks like a more dangerous opponent for Brook than Alexander did. I wonder if Brook Vs. Porter will actually happen. I suspect more injuries and water treading from Special K.
Occasionally you let your mask slip. Just stick to posting Allegedly channel updates mate, you are sh*t at boxing.
That was a sneaky addition to your original post you rascal
TJ77
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1352
Joined: 19 Sep 2010, 13:01

Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook

Post by TJ77 »

Im not in the business of calling people names for nowt.
Slag Kell when its not justified I will call you a melt.
Its not been easy for him or us and I really hope he wins you over.
No offence meant really im sure your sound just stop making silly statements and I will stop the silly name calling. :TU:
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4738
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: Shawn Porter v Kell Brook

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

funtime wrote:Where does Porters performance place Amir Kahn?

Both struggled against Diaz, when most believed they had no right to yet porter proved he is top 10 at 147.

Is Diaz better than was presented or just a coincidence?
Porter and Khan both took Diaz lightly expecting to beat him easily I think.

But "The Kidd" was a good fighter in his day and still is when the mood takes him as both found out.
Post Reply