I think it's the first time ain't bunked the train & hid in the carziesAden wrote:You're not sitting with Kenny Rogers are you, mate?Spud wrote:
I am on the train at the moment ... I am holding a couple of cards in my hand and for a change I am going to deal them at the right time.
D when the ticket collector comes spud will abuse him before showing him his hand?
He's only a multiple champion because he has lost it twice. He has never, ever been number one in his division.Spud wrote:
I am on the train at the moment ... I will respond to you tossers asap ... With regards to being in the minority never will have a problem there.
I remember years ago I stated Carl Froch would be a multiple world champion, i got ridiculed etc etc, now i am saying George Groves will be exposed for the **** I think he is - I am holding a couple of cards in my hand and for a change I am going to deal them at the right time.
Now please young man, many people have tried in the past, do not tell me what I am thinking or know ... yet again you use the word "we" ... can you not write posts and stand up for yourself ... you are yet another spineless p*ick who is desperate to court favour with the forum ... write for yourself!!SNG wrote:...and Yusef Mack.Spud wrote: By consistently taking on the very best the Super Middleweight division has to offer ...
Look, Froch bleated on about Kessler 2 being the rematch the fans wanted to see, now the fans are actually telling him what they want to see, a fight that would be the biggest out there for him and he's talking about not doing it. We all know why, you do too.
Bit harsh that he's only been second to ward who's creme de la creme. When he beat pascal then Taylor I think that proved he was more then a legitimate championmickey1975 wrote:He's only a multiple champion because he has lost it twice. He has never, ever been number one in his division.Spud wrote:
I am on the train at the moment ... I will respond to you tossers asap ... With regards to being in the minority never will have a problem there.
I remember years ago I stated Carl Froch would be a multiple world champion, i got ridiculed etc etc, now i am saying George Groves will be exposed for the **** I think he is - I am holding a couple of cards in my hand and for a change I am going to deal them at the right time.
To the contrary young man - I think its hilarious many of you on this forum try lump the fickle/consistency problem on me ...Power777 wrote:GOOD QUESTION!hurlock wrote:Does spud think the same way of Hayes treatment to wladimir?
Atleast groves backed it up.
But we all know SPUD is not consistent.
everyone in boxing knows me as Spud .. and through my opinions on here and elsewhere plus sheer hard graft throughout the years I accomplished my dreams in that I have worked in boxing and got up to things in the sport that most of you lot can only wank about whilst reading your Boxing News!! ;;-) If you think that fight is as big as Froch v Ward 2 you are kidding yourself.Power777 wrote:GROVES VS WARD in the UK would show Carl Cock.
see what happens when people work with the dark lord!! The smugness of this post!! 
DDLets get serious here ... do you think your post is a bit harsh??mickey1975 wrote:He's only a multiple champion because he has lost it twice. He has never, ever been number one in his division.
Ricky Hatton at light welterweight.Aden wrote:Carl is a British great but I think it's fair to say that he's never been the best in the division globally. Which Brits have been in the past thirty years or so? Haye at cruiserweight, Joe at super-middleweight, and Lennox at heavyweight, beyond that..?
Joe had to wait!Aden wrote:Carl is a British great but I think it's fair to say that he's never been the best in the division globally. Which Brits have been in the past thirty years or so? Haye at cruiserweight, Joe at super-middleweight, and Lennox at heavyweight, beyond that..?
You're going to have Silly Nelson on here within 5 minutesAden wrote:Carl is a British great but I think it's fair to say that he's never been the best in the division globally. Which Brits have been in the past thirty years or so? Haye at cruiserweight, Joe at super-middleweight, and Lennox at heavyweight, beyond that..?
I think Ricky would've been beaten by more than one other active pro who could've done 140lb at the time. Before people start, I admit I've got a odd way of looking at things.Horse wrote:Ricky Hatton at light welterweight.Aden wrote:Carl is a British great but I think it's fair to say that he's never been the best in the division globally. Which Brits have been in the past thirty years or so? Haye at cruiserweight, Joe at super-middleweight, and Lennox at heavyweight, beyond that..?
It was noticed a long time agoAden wrote:I think Ricky would've been beaten by more than one other active pro who could've done 140lb at the time. Before people start, I admit I've got a odd way of looking at things.Horse wrote:Ricky Hatton at light welterweight.Aden wrote:Carl is a British great but I think it's fair to say that he's never been the best in the division globally. Which Brits have been in the past thirty years or so? Haye at cruiserweight, Joe at super-middleweight, and Lennox at heavyweight, beyond that..?
Who asked you, chubby legs?palooka wrote:It was noticed a long time ago
Aden wrote:Who asked you, chubby legs?palooka wrote:It was noticed a long time ago
I've been here watching all along
)Yes. But it's true. I'm just twisting things to suit my agenda like everyone else does on here.Spud wrote:Lets get serious here ... do you think your post is a bit harsh??mickey1975 wrote:He's only a multiple champion because he has lost it twice. He has never, ever been number one in his division.
mickey1975 wrote:Yes. But it's true. I'm just twisting things to suit my agenda like everyone else does on here.Spud wrote:Lets get serious here ... do you think your post is a bit harsh??mickey1975 wrote:He's only a multiple champion because he has lost it twice. He has never, ever been number one in his division.
mickey1975 wrote:Yes. But it's true. I'm just twisting things to suit my agenda like everyone else does on here.Spud wrote:Lets get serious here ... do you think your post is a bit harsh??mickey1975 wrote:He's only a multiple champion because he has lost it twice. He has never, ever been number one in his division.
Froch can box who he likes but I'll not pay to see him v Chavez Jnr or Ward 2, I'll shell out for Groves 2. Froch has faced very good fighters and has my respect as a boxer and a champion; he has let himself down or shown his true character with the Groves thing, he has been very dismissive and really believes that something happened other than actually happened. He thought he was a full league above Groves and that Groves was chinny. I don't think that Froch is afraid of Groves but I do think that George shocked him a hell of a lot and it was a very fortunate stoppage (for Froch). It was Froch that took a beating and he is far older with far more miles on the clock; Groves can improve and do better, I don't think Froch can, I think he's on the slide.mickey1975 wrote:Yes. But it's true. I'm just twisting things to suit my agenda like everyone else does on here.Spud wrote:Lets get serious here ... do you think your post is a bit harsh??mickey1975 wrote:He's only a multiple champion because he has lost it twice. He has never, ever been number one in his division.
What kind of fuckin response is that? Court favour with the forum? You need to grow the fornicate up. I have literally no idea why you've chosen to attack me instead of my point, I can only guess you have no argument.Spud wrote:Now please young man, many people have tried in the past, do not tell me what I am thinking or know ... yet again you use the word "we" ... can you not write posts and stand up for yourself ... you are yet another spineless p*ick who is desperate to court favour with the forum ... write for yourself!!SNG wrote:...and Yusef Mack.Spud wrote: By consistently taking on the very best the Super Middleweight division has to offer ...
Look, Froch bleated on about Kessler 2 being the rematch the fans wanted to see, now the fans are actually telling him what they want to see, a fight that would be the biggest out there for him and he's talking about not doing it. We all know why, you do too.
Are you suggesting TJ77 is going to be found naked in the street interfering with himself?G0mez wrote:This topic is like Kony 2012