Mayweather v Pacquiao Is On Say Sources
-
ajwesty13
- Heavyweight

Mayweather v Pacquiao Is On Say Sources
Sources are coming out and stating that the deal has been done... Both parties have come to an agreement and will be fighting on the 14 of September..
Thoughts??
Mine are i personally think that pac has not aged as well MW, and is not the fighter he was a few years a go.... but still would love to see this fight... result is MW by decision
Thoughts??
Mine are i personally think that pac has not aged as well MW, and is not the fighter he was a few years a go.... but still would love to see this fight... result is MW by decision
Re: Mayweather v Pacquiao Is On Say Sources
Amir Khan will be happy!
-
ajwesty13
- Heavyweight

Re: Mayweather v Pacquiao Is On Say Sources
Over the moon springs to mind :)earsjohn wrote:Amir Khan will be happy!
Re: Mayweather v Pacquiao Is On Say Sources
deffo Khan in May Pacman Sept
Re: Mayweather v Pacquiao Is On Say Sources
Believe it when I see it.....where do you get this from???
-
ajwesty13
- Heavyweight

Re: Mayweather v Pacquiao Is On Say Sources
sources that broke the MW v Guerro/Canelo fight but then there is other sources that say it isnt on but then Pac is now the mandatory ... i so wish i never opened this can of worms lolTopGun wrote:Believe it when I see it.....where do you get this from???
Re: Mayweather v Pacquiao Is On Say Sources
About fcuking time 
Re: Mayweather v Pacquiao Is On Say Sources
A) I don't believe it will happen.
B) If it does it will be a complete anti-climax. As already mentioned, Pacman has declined too much to be any sort of viable threat to Mayweather.
B) If it does it will be a complete anti-climax. As already mentioned, Pacman has declined too much to be any sort of viable threat to Mayweather.
-
ajwesty13
- Heavyweight

Re: Mayweather v Pacquiao Is On Say Sources
yeah would have liked this to happen a few years a go.... still looking forward to it if it does happen thou..Deserter wrote:A) I don't believe it will happen.
B) If it does it will be a complete anti-climax. As already mentioned, Pacman has declined too much to be any sort of viable threat to Mayweather.
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13114
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00
Re: Mayweather v Pacquiao Is On Say Sources
Is Say Sources a channel I can stream?
-
ttornado
- Heavyweight

Re: Mayweather v Pacquiao Is On Say Sources
Wow great match up, amazed it hasn't been talked about before now
Re: Mayweather v Pacquiao Is On Say Sources
Floyd would of beaten any version of Manny. Anyway, im not sure where the conclusive evidence is that Manny has declined that much as a fighter aside from Marquez timing him and knocking him clean out. The Rios fight, he was just going through the motions.
Re: Mayweather v Pacquiao Is On Say Sources
I'm not falling for it, what evidence do we have to back this claim up? Nothing by the sounds of it!
If this fight ever happens news of it wont break out on a boxing forum.
If this fight ever happens news of it wont break out on a boxing forum.
-
Spud
- Heavyweight

Re: Mayweather v Pacquiao Is On Say Sources
The fight is a f*cking million miles from being made - FACT
-
Spud
- Heavyweight

Re: Mayweather v Pacquiao Is On Say Sources
I was being a tadge conservative!!Power777 wrote:Thanks for that.Spud wrote:The fight is a f*cking million miles from being made - FACT
Re: Mayweather v Pacquiao Is On Say Sources
ALI wrote:I'm not falling for it, what evidence do we have to back this claim up? Nothing by the sounds of it!
If this fight ever happens news of it wont break out on a boxing forum.
-
ajwesty13
- Heavyweight

Re: Mayweather v Pacquiao Is On Say Sources
it was from youtube boxingtv channel... stumbled on it today... but it seems as though its a load of bo11ox..oh well knew it was to good to be true. .ALI wrote:I'm not falling for it, what evidence do we have to back this claim up? Nothing by the sounds of it!
If this fight ever happens news of it wont break out on a boxing forum.
however it seems as though the guardian reads these boxing forums haha
http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2014/j ... -september
-
Boxing Prospect
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 6592
- Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35
Re: Mayweather v Pacquiao Is On Say Sources
Pacquiao the mandatory? I keep reading that but, isn't he just the #1 contender? According to the WBC Mayweather v Guerrero was a mandatory, less than a year ago.
Re: Mayweather v Pacquiao Is On Say Sources
true thatViktor Vaughn wrote:The WBC rules state that you have to make one mandatory per year, but they also say that you have to defend the WBC belt at least three times a year (one mano, two voluntaries). On the other hand, they can make concessions depending on circumstances and, to ice the cake, the President has special dispensation to make things up as he goes along.Boxing Prospect wrote:Pacquiao the mandatory? I keep reading that but, isn't he just the #1 contender? According to the WBC Mayweather v Guerrero was a mandatory, less than a year ago.
This story will have stemmed from someone looking at the rules, seeing that he did his mandatory last year and put two and two together.
The WBC, and Floyd for that matter, can do whatever they want whenever they want to do it.
As for the fight, Manny gets battered by Floyd at any point in their careers.