He can't do it. If we are thinking about Rocky endings, why doesn't he knock Wlad out in Germany? What a way to go.DMA1987 wrote:Cheers captain obvious. How about beating Ward?mickey1975 wrote:Stopping Groves in Nottingham will be a much more triumphant way to go than losing a shut out to Andre Ward in America.nobby_nobbins wrote:At this late stage of his career I hope Froch goes for a fight with international significance rather than just bow out after a domestic grudge match. Win or lose, I think it would be a sad anti-climax to a great career.
Groves v froch reasons why it won't happen.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23200
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Groves v froch reasons why it won't happen.
Re: Groves v froch reasons why it won't happen.
Now you're talking. Wlad might get a German decision though, wouldn't be fair to Froch to have a robbery loss on his CV.mickey1975 wrote:He can't do it. If we are thinking about Rocky endings, why doesn't he knock Wlad out in Germany? What a way to go.DMA1987 wrote:Cheers captain obvious. How about beating Ward?mickey1975 wrote: Stopping Groves in Nottingham will be a much more triumphant way to go than losing a shut out to Andre Ward in America.
Re: Groves v froch reasons why it won't happen.
Agreedwadey wrote:I think Groves should tell them to stuff the 15% on offer and just move on. Let Froch live with the fact that his victory was unjust, which I'm sure people will remind him of long into his retirement.
-
nobby_nobbins
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 654
- Joined: 22 Apr 2008, 16:07
Re: Groves v froch reasons why it won't happen.
Yes, but what if he loses to Groves in Nottingham? Ending your career on the wrong end of a decision in Vegas to one of the best boxers in the world sounds preferable to being knocked out by a domestic challenger in Nottingham.mickey1975 wrote:Stopping Groves in Nottingham will be a much more triumphant way to go than losing a shut out to Andre Ward in America.nobby_nobbins wrote:At this late stage of his career I hope Froch goes for a fight with international significance rather than just bow out after a domestic grudge match. Win or lose, I think it would be a sad anti-climax to a great career.
Froch has earned his chance to avenge his loss to the best man in the division. Sure Ward is an overwhelming favourite. All Ward's prospective fights look like mismatches. But even seemingly peerless talents like him have to be challenged.
Re: Groves v froch reasons why it won't happen.
froch was coming on in the fight and was not at fault for the bs stoppage so to say it is unjust is a bit unfairwadey wrote:I think Groves should tell them to stuff the 15% on offer and just move on. Let Froch live with the fact that his victory was unjust, which I'm sure people will remind him of long into his retirement.
-
lillywhite14
- Heavyweight

Re: Groves v froch reasons why it won't happen.
They won't. The longer a fighter is retired, the better he becomes. That's what usually happens!wadey wrote:I think Groves should tell them to stuff the 15% on offer and just move on. Let Froch live with the fact that his victory was unjust, which I'm sure people will remind him of long into his retirement.
The stoppage was early, not Froch's fault. He has plenty of fine career moments to render that almost irrelevant. The tear up with Pascal, dramatic stoppage of Taylor, completely out boxing Abraham away from home. The two wars with Kessler. Smashing the next big thing in Bute etc
Where does Groves move on to exactly? Despite his chat his options are limited when compared to Froch's. plenty of top fighters want Froch. After Stevenson stopped Bellew he was talking Froch for example.
Groves "moves on" and he is looking at earning much, much less than the 15% he is currently looking at.