In fairness, I thought he won, fair and square.
Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17174
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the
Rees should appeal to the BBBofC and try and get it made a No Contest.
In fairness, I thought he won, fair and square.
In fairness, I thought he won, fair and square.
-
CiganoBoxer
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1302
- Joined: 11 Jun 2010, 14:57
Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the
Not being funny mate , but your talking out your arse comparing the Beltran burns robbery to Buckland v Rees , burns had the granny punched out of him from pillar to post, jaw broke and was never in that fight.Horse wrote:Rees vs Crolla wasn't a robbery, but this fight was.
Rees was clearly the winner in a close fight, just like Beltran was against Burns.
Buckland had Rees hurt a few times in that fight, it looked like a few times in that corner that he was gonna quit to,very close fight could of went ether way but nothing like that Beltran burns out and out robbery!
I think u need to go to specsavers
Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the
This fight couldn't have gone either way, Rees clearly won. It was a robbery.CiganoBoxer wrote:Not being funny mate , but your talking out your arse comparing the Beltran burns robbery to Buckland v Rees , burns had the granny punched out of him from pillar to post, jaw broke and was never in that fight.
Buckland had Rees hurt a few times in that fight, it looked like a few times in that corner that he was gonna quit to,very close fight could of went ether way but nothing like that Beltran burns out and out robbery!
I think u need to go to specsavers
Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the
I think Crolla is underrated, seems very accurate and tidy. Thought he beat Derry 2nd time round, definitely beat Rees IMO, should have been UD not MD and was easy V Foster. Didn't see the Sykes 2nd fight over 3 rounds though.. what was that all about??handsofstone wrote:I,d put a pound on Buckland to stop Crolla if they were to fight
Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the
He usually does mate!CiganoBoxer wrote:Not being funny mate , but your talking out your arse comparing the Beltran burns robbery to Buckland v Rees , burns had the granny punched out of him from pillar to post, jaw broke and was never in that fight.Horse wrote:Rees vs Crolla wasn't a robbery, but this fight was.
Rees was clearly the winner in a close fight, just like Beltran was against Burns.
Buckland had Rees hurt a few times in that fight, it looked like a few times in that corner that he was gonna quit to,very close fight could of went ether way but nothing like that Beltran burns out and out robbery!
I think u need to go to specsavers
-
gazza8
- Heavyweight

Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the
I had Rees winning by 3 rounds on the night and after rewatching minus the beer i had him 1 by 2.
again it was no suprise Terry O'connor was involved
again it was no suprise Terry O'connor was involved
-
CiganoBoxer
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1302
- Joined: 11 Jun 2010, 14:57
Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the
Wanna chip in for himcolumbo wrote:He usually does mate!CiganoBoxer wrote:Not being funny mate , but your talking out your arse comparing the Beltran burns robbery to Buckland v Rees , burns had the granny punched out of him from pillar to post, jaw broke and was never in that fight.Horse wrote:Rees vs Crolla wasn't a robbery, but this fight was.
Rees was clearly the winner in a close fight, just like Beltran was against Burns.
Buckland had Rees hurt a few times in that fight, it looked like a few times in that corner that he was gonna quit to,very close fight could of went ether way but nothing like that Beltran burns out and out robbery!
I think u need to go to specsavers
Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the
Wasnt surprised to See IJL jump in to another controvesial stoppage in the selby fight also
its becoming a main talking point in british boxing these days , Judges and Refs
its becoming a main talking point in british boxing these days , Judges and Refs
gazza8 wrote:I had Rees winning by 3 rounds on the night and after rewatching minus the beer i had him 1 by 2.
again it was no suprise Terry O'connor was involved
Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the
columbo wrote:He usually does mate!
Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the
Horse wrote:columbo wrote:He usually does mate!
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17174
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the
palooka wrote:Horse wrote:columbo wrote:He usually does mate!
owned
Yep. Game, set and match to columbo.
Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the
Insulting people is easy. I was not "owned" by columbo's bland insult.palooka wrote:owned
Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the
The first 2 sentence post by Horse in living memory.Horse wrote:Insulting people is easy. I was not "owned" by columbo's bland insult.palooka wrote:owned
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17174
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the
Opinion states otherwise.Horse wrote:Insulting people is easy. I was not "owned" by columbo's bland insult.palooka wrote:owned
Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the
Should we have a poll? 
Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the
I've posted four 2 sentence posts in this thread alone.palooka wrote:The first 2 sentence post by Horse in living memory.
What are you on about?
Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the
I've got poor short term memory but I'm happy you went and counted them for me 
Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the
So what was the point of your comment anyway? To mock my conciseness?palooka wrote:I've got poor short term memory but I'm happy you went and counted them for me
Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the
Get over yourself high Horse - you come across as someone who knows a lot about boxing but who is a bit of a cock.Horse wrote:So what was the point of your comment anyway? To mock my conciseness?palooka wrote:I've got poor short term memory but I'm happy you went and counted them for me
Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the
Good.palooka wrote:Get over yourself high Horse - you come across as someone who knows a lot about boxing but who is a bit of a cock.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17174
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the
You're happy to be a cock?Horse wrote:Good.palooka wrote:Get over yourself high Horse - you come across as someone who knows a lot about boxing but who is a bit of a cock.
-
Yes We Can
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 2087
- Joined: 29 Sep 2010, 17:16
Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the
Rees hitting low constantly not mentioned yet?
Personally i thought Rees nicked it, but how many favours did he do himself having to be pushed back to the corner between rounds? a close round could easily be lost due to Buckland looking the fresher man consistently.
Personally i thought Rees nicked it, but how many favours did he do himself having to be pushed back to the corner between rounds? a close round could easily be lost due to Buckland looking the fresher man consistently.
Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the
It was a 50-50 fight IMO, could've gone eitehr way, certainly no robbery
Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the
It wasn't 50-50 though. 0 out of 25 members of the press scored it for Buckland and the average press score had Rees winning by three points.Chambers2 wrote:It was a 50-50 fight IMO, could've gone eitehr way, certainly no robbery
-
Yes We Can
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 2087
- Joined: 29 Sep 2010, 17:16
Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the
aaaaaah, the press, never ones to have an agenda them.Horse wrote:It wasn't 50-50 though. 0 out of 25 members of the press scored it for Buckland and the average press score had Rees winning by three points.Chambers2 wrote:It was a 50-50 fight IMO, could've gone eitehr way, certainly no robbery
Gav did himself no favours. How many times did Buckland get wheeled back to the corner by his trainer?