Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the

keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17177
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Rees should appeal to the BBBofC and try and get it made a No Contest. :roll:

In fairness, I thought he won, fair and square.
CiganoBoxer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1302
Joined: 11 Jun 2010, 14:57

Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the

Post by CiganoBoxer »

Horse wrote:Rees vs Crolla wasn't a robbery, but this fight was.

Rees was clearly the winner in a close fight, just like Beltran was against Burns.
Not being funny mate , but your talking out your arse comparing the Beltran burns robbery to Buckland v Rees , burns had the granny punched out of him from pillar to post, jaw broke and was never in that fight.
Buckland had Rees hurt a few times in that fight, it looked like a few times in that corner that he was gonna quit to,very close fight could of went ether way but nothing like that Beltran burns out and out robbery!
I think u need to go to specsavers :lol:
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the

Post by Horse »

CiganoBoxer wrote:Not being funny mate , but your talking out your arse comparing the Beltran burns robbery to Buckland v Rees , burns had the granny punched out of him from pillar to post, jaw broke and was never in that fight.
Buckland had Rees hurt a few times in that fight, it looked like a few times in that corner that he was gonna quit to,very close fight could of went ether way but nothing like that Beltran burns out and out robbery!
I think u need to go to specsavers :lol:
This fight couldn't have gone either way, Rees clearly won. It was a robbery.
danamba7
Middleweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 30 Sep 2013, 09:30

Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the

Post by danamba7 »

handsofstone wrote:I,d put a pound on Buckland to stop Crolla if they were to fight :box:
I think Crolla is underrated, seems very accurate and tidy. Thought he beat Derry 2nd time round, definitely beat Rees IMO, should have been UD not MD and was easy V Foster. Didn't see the Sykes 2nd fight over 3 rounds though.. what was that all about??
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the

Post by lefty »

CiganoBoxer wrote:
Horse wrote:Rees vs Crolla wasn't a robbery, but this fight was.

Rees was clearly the winner in a close fight, just like Beltran was against Burns.
Not being funny mate , but your talking out your arse comparing the Beltran burns robbery to Buckland v Rees , burns had the granny punched out of him from pillar to post, jaw broke and was never in that fight.
Buckland had Rees hurt a few times in that fight, it looked like a few times in that corner that he was gonna quit to,very close fight could of went ether way but nothing like that Beltran burns out and out robbery!
I think u need to go to specsavers :lol:
He usually does mate!
gazza8
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the

Post by gazza8 »

I had Rees winning by 3 rounds on the night and after rewatching minus the beer i had him 1 by 2.

again it was no suprise Terry O'connor was involved
CiganoBoxer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1302
Joined: 11 Jun 2010, 14:57

Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the

Post by CiganoBoxer »

columbo wrote:
CiganoBoxer wrote:
Horse wrote:Rees vs Crolla wasn't a robbery, but this fight was.

Rees was clearly the winner in a close fight, just like Beltran was against Burns.
Not being funny mate , but your talking out your arse comparing the Beltran burns robbery to Buckland v Rees , burns had the granny punched out of him from pillar to post, jaw broke and was never in that fight.
Buckland had Rees hurt a few times in that fight, it looked like a few times in that corner that he was gonna quit to,very close fight could of went ether way but nothing like that Beltran burns out and out robbery!
I think u need to go to specsavers :lol:
He usually does mate!
Wanna chip in for him :lol: ?
Gazmac81
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2103
Joined: 04 Oct 2008, 10:06

Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the

Post by Gazmac81 »

Wasnt surprised to See IJL jump in to another controvesial stoppage in the selby fight also

its becoming a main talking point in british boxing these days , Judges and Refs

gazza8 wrote:I had Rees winning by 3 rounds on the night and after rewatching minus the beer i had him 1 by 2.

again it was no suprise Terry O'connor was involved
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the

Post by Horse »

columbo wrote:He usually does mate!
:roll:
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the

Post by palooka »

Horse wrote:
columbo wrote:He usually does mate!
:roll:

:OhYes: owned
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17177
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the

Post by keithmoonhangover »

palooka wrote:
Horse wrote:
columbo wrote:He usually does mate!
:roll:

:OhYes: owned

Yep. Game, set and match to columbo.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the

Post by Horse »

palooka wrote: :OhYes: owned
Insulting people is easy. I was not "owned" by columbo's bland insult.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the

Post by palooka »

Horse wrote:
palooka wrote: :OhYes: owned
Insulting people is easy. I was not "owned" by columbo's bland insult.
The first 2 sentence post by Horse in living memory.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17177
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Horse wrote:
palooka wrote: :OhYes: owned
Insulting people is easy. I was not "owned" by columbo's bland insult.
Opinion states otherwise. :OhYes:
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the

Post by palooka »

Should we have a poll? :OhYes:
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the

Post by Horse »

palooka wrote:The first 2 sentence post by Horse in living memory.
I've posted four 2 sentence posts in this thread alone.

What are you on about?
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the

Post by palooka »

I've got poor short term memory but I'm happy you went and counted them for me :TU:
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the

Post by Horse »

palooka wrote:I've got poor short term memory but I'm happy you went and counted them for me :TU:
So what was the point of your comment anyway? To mock my conciseness?
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the

Post by palooka »

Horse wrote:
palooka wrote:I've got poor short term memory but I'm happy you went and counted them for me :TU:
So what was the point of your comment anyway? To mock my conciseness?
Get over yourself high Horse - you come across as someone who knows a lot about boxing but who is a bit of a cock.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the

Post by Horse »

palooka wrote:Get over yourself high Horse - you come across as someone who knows a lot about boxing but who is a bit of a cock.
Good.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17177
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Horse wrote:
palooka wrote:Get over yourself high Horse - you come across as someone who knows a lot about boxing but who is a bit of a cock.
Good.
You're happy to be a cock?
Yes We Can
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2087
Joined: 29 Sep 2010, 17:16

Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the

Post by Yes We Can »

Rees hitting low constantly not mentioned yet?

Personally i thought Rees nicked it, but how many favours did he do himself having to be pushed back to the corner between rounds? a close round could easily be lost due to Buckland looking the fresher man consistently.
Chambers2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6499
Joined: 24 Feb 2004, 07:24

Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the

Post by Chambers2 »

It was a 50-50 fight IMO, could've gone eitehr way, certainly no robbery
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the

Post by Horse »

Chambers2 wrote:It was a 50-50 fight IMO, could've gone eitehr way, certainly no robbery
It wasn't 50-50 though. 0 out of 25 members of the press scored it for Buckland and the average press score had Rees winning by three points.
Yes We Can
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2087
Joined: 29 Sep 2010, 17:16

Re: Rees- Buckland : not 1 press member had Buckland winning the

Post by Yes We Can »

Horse wrote:
Chambers2 wrote:It was a 50-50 fight IMO, could've gone eitehr way, certainly no robbery
It wasn't 50-50 though. 0 out of 25 members of the press scored it for Buckland and the average press score had Rees winning by three points.
aaaaaah, the press, never ones to have an agenda them.


Gav did himself no favours. How many times did Buckland get wheeled back to the corner by his trainer?
Post Reply