Frankie Gavins next fight announced

Boxing Prospect
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: Frankie Gavins next fight announced

Post by Boxing Prospect »

Boxingcutsman wrote:
Boxing Prospect wrote:
Boxingcutsman wrote:It puzzles me what people expect sometimes :doh:

Of course the opponent isn't great, but he can only fight who ever is in front of him and his mandatory's, which he has done, he's welcomed and called for any challengers.

John Murray, Kevin Mitchell, Kell Brook, Ricky Hatton to name but a few had a lot more fights than what Frankie's had before they even fought anyone half decent never mind fighting for a world title.
Whilst that's true lets not forget only 1 of those 4 men actually won a world title. Lets use him to the the rest of what you said off.

Hatton fought Lauri in fight #21, by that point he had been a profession for 3 years...Frankie has been a pro for damn close to 5.

It doesn't just matter how many fights you have but also how regularly you're having them and the expectation and hype you have around you. Gavin has hype, expectation amateur pedigree etc but 5 years on he's STILL fighting at this sort of level.

It puzzles me that people actually defend him still.

And that 1 man had 39 fights in over 8 years before he fought for world title :TU:
True enough, he was still younger than Gavin is now though.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Frankie Gavins next fight announced

Post by expe »

magnus wrote:
expe wrote:I doubt Sacky's up to much and it will probably be over quickly, but he's WBO #14, which is why Frankie's fighting him and it gets the Commonwealth defence out the way. The plan, as Frankie has stated, is to get this lad out the way, then a final eliminator in Birmingham in June/July against Bethuel Ushona, who was comfortably beaten by Denton Vassell a few years ago, but he's ranked #2, behind Pacquaio so he will be #1 after Bradley-Pacquiao II. After that it's up to Fwank to work his WBO magic and force the mandatory quickly. If the mandatory's enforced, Bradley or Pacquiao would likely vacate, leaving Frankie to fight for a vacant title at home and the last mandatory for the WBO belt was Cotto-Jennings in February 2009, so it's long overdue.
That's a big "if" though. As you point out, there hasn't been one for years.

Beating these guys isn't exactly ideal preparation for world class.
It's Fwank VVarren with the WBO, it might take a few months, but he'll get the mandatory enforced and the fact there hasn't been one for 5 years only helps his case.
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: Frankie Gavins next fight announced

Post by bripez »

Boxing Prospect wrote: Hatton fought Lauri in fight #21, by that point he had been a profession for 3 years...Frankie has been a pro for damn close to 5.
True - not only that, Hatton turned pro as an 18 year old kid and not a 24 year old man who was World amateur champion.

Assuming that Gavin has now settled his personal and training stuff he needs to get a move on. If he doesn't sell many tickets then why not take a flyer and go for an opportunity abroad that will be wither for a World Title or put him in the mix for one.

I am sure that if you said to Gavin 5 years ago that he would be in this position and hoping to move on a spurious alphabet title that he would not have believed you.
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Frankie Gavins next fight announced

Post by Andrew »

I have to admit I laughed hard at this persons name.

Seriosuly though thats embarassing. Just look at what Matchroom did with Purdy getting the European champ over late last year. That should have been Frankie in a show in Birmingham. 8 months since the Vassel and quality of opposition has regressed real shame as he impressed me that night.
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Frankie Gavins next fight announced

Post by Andrew »

Boxrec 151 :doh:
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: Frankie Gavins next fight announced

Post by bripez »

Naandrew wrote:I have to admit I laughed hard at this persons name.
I am just hoping that John Mcdonald gets the ring announcers job for this one ........
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11182
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Frankie Gavins next fight announced

Post by Ezzard »

I think he gets better and better every time I see him.
magnus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1178
Joined: 13 Dec 2004, 08:59

Re: Frankie Gavins next fight announced

Post by magnus »

expe wrote:
magnus wrote:
expe wrote:I doubt Sacky's up to much and it will probably be over quickly, but he's WBO #14, which is why Frankie's fighting him and it gets the Commonwealth defence out the way. The plan, as Frankie has stated, is to get this lad out the way, then a final eliminator in Birmingham in June/July against Bethuel Ushona, who was comfortably beaten by Denton Vassell a few years ago, but he's ranked #2, behind Pacquaio so he will be #1 after Bradley-Pacquiao II. After that it's up to Fwank to work his WBO magic and force the mandatory quickly. If the mandatory's enforced, Bradley or Pacquiao would likely vacate, leaving Frankie to fight for a vacant title at home and the last mandatory for the WBO belt was Cotto-Jennings in February 2009, so it's long overdue.
That's a big "if" though. As you point out, there hasn't been one for years.

Beating these guys isn't exactly ideal preparation for world class.
It's Fwank VVarren with the WBO, it might take a few months, but he'll get the mandatory enforced and the fact there hasn't been one for 5 years only helps his case.
If it's a vacant title I'd tend to agree mate. But if it's Pac (or to a lesser extent, Bradley) - little to no chance they get pressured into fighting Gavin. Similar to Rabchenko - he won't be fighting FM for the WBC title any time soon.
danconnollyeire
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 3576
Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31

Re: Frankie Gavins next fight announced

Post by danconnollyeire »

This guy was stopped by Norman Tshisikhawe 7-9-0
He's going backwards with this one
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Frankie Gavins next fight announced

Post by expe »

magnus wrote:
expe wrote:
magnus wrote:
That's a big "if" though. As you point out, there hasn't been one for years.

Beating these guys isn't exactly ideal preparation for world class.
It's Fwank VVarren with the WBO, it might take a few months, but he'll get the mandatory enforced and the fact there hasn't been one for 5 years only helps his case.
If it's a vacant title I'd tend to agree mate. But if it's Pac (or to a lesser extent, Bradley) - little to no chance they get pressured into fighting Gavin. Similar to Rabchenko - he won't be fighting FM for the WBC title any time soon.
There's no chance either Pacquiao or Bradley will fight him, but I doubt they're bothered by that, even the WBO have to call a mandatory eventually and in that scenario, both Bradley and Pacquiao would likely vacate and look elsewhere, leaving Frankie to fight for the vacant title in Birmingham, it's just a question of when the WBO decide to enforce it, Frankie will probably have to fight again after Ushona before he gets a shot, but as long as he's mandatory then he knows it will come eventually.
Old Jack J
Middleweight
Posts: 1626
Joined: 24 Jan 2014, 16:34

Re: Frankie Gavins next fight announced

Post by Old Jack J »

Fella has a cracking name though, eh?
magnus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1178
Joined: 13 Dec 2004, 08:59

Re: Frankie Gavins next fight announced

Post by magnus »

[/quote]
There's no chance either Pacquiao or Bradley will fight him, but I doubt they're bothered by that, even the WBO have to call a mandatory eventually and in that scenario, both Bradley and Pacquiao would likely vacate and look elsewhere, leaving Frankie to fight for the vacant title in Birmingham, it's just a question of when the WBO decide to enforce it, Frankie will probably have to fight again after Ushona before he gets a shot, but as long as he's mandatory then he knows it will come eventually.[/quote]

Any governing body bends over backwards to keep the likes of Pac as their champion rather than force them to fight challengers who have little or no profile worldwide. If Gavin could beat some names and get people interested outside the UK, that would help his cause no end. Fighting the likes of Ushona won't help him do this. FW would be better off trying to get the likes of Collazo for Gavin in the next 12 months. It's not just about the ranking in the Welterweight division, it's about profile.
rio
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1173
Joined: 22 Oct 2012, 16:48

Re: Frankie Gavins next fight announced

Post by rio »

Crap fight. Gavin is way above this level he shoukd vacate. Why isn't he fighting for the euro belt against the guy who beat purdy? This is a huge step down from vassell.
black panther
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4098
Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 07:06

Re: Frankie Gavins next fight announced

Post by black panther »

This fight sounds like a Sack of Shit-atatu.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Frankie Gavins next fight announced

Post by expe »

rio wrote:Crap fight. Gavin is way above this level he shoukd vacate. Why isn't he fighting for the euro belt against the guy who beat purdy? This is a huge step down from vassell.
Bundu has a mandatory up next against Gianluca Branco and he isn't ranked by the WBO, which is the route they're taking. Frankie's ranked 5 by the WBO, as bad as he's likely to be, Sacky's #14, so beating him will move him up the rankings to guarantee the Ushona fight that's lined up for the summer is a final eliminator and it means he keeps hold of the Commonwealth belt incase he has to wait for the world title shot, so there's still fights out there for him. So, shit opponent and what should be an easy victory, but it moves him up the WBO rankings and Sacky will be cheap, which is why Wazza has brought him over rather than some of the other fighters in the WBO top 15 that are available.
ttornado
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Frankie Gavins next fight announced

Post by ttornado »

#16 vs #151

Poor match-up
whiteboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 540
Joined: 07 Mar 2008, 19:48

Re: Frankie Gavins next fight announced

Post by whiteboy »

Aden wrote:Frankie isn't a ticket seller
what's that based off exactly?
Anzi
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1317
Joined: 13 Jan 2013, 18:29

Re: Frankie Gavins next fight announced

Post by Anzi »

whiteboy wrote:
Aden wrote:Frankie isn't a ticket seller
what's that based off exactly?
The fact that he has not topped a bill in his home town ?
Anzi
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1317
Joined: 13 Jan 2013, 18:29

Re: Frankie Gavins next fight announced

Post by Anzi »

This promise of a bigger fight next, has been branded about for long while, always next time, I don't think the money or the tickets sales are there, to make it happen, Warren is going to have to build Gavin's profile up, like Hearn did with Brook, market him and build him up in Birmingham, with him on smaller venues to start with, progressing to larger venues later on, the other way would be to put on another magnificent seven show, at a big venue, but has he got the fighters this time to do that ?
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Frankie Gavins next fight announced

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

I'm going to predict this turns out to be a competitive matchup with Sack 'o' Shitikuku coming to win and making a good fight of it, like Woodhouse did.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Frankie Gavins next fight announced

Post by palooka »

I'd not like to see either Frankie or Bundu knocked off; I think that Gavin needs a decent test, he did marvelous against Vassell who is an excellent fighter. Bundu shined v Purdy and I'd like to see him get a straight shot or a go at Brook. Though I think Brook is very good and a strong solid boxer I think Frankie or Bundu may upset him if they boxed this year. (I'm not trolling there, Brook is very good but may go over).
Post Reply