Have the bboc re Bruce baker gone mad?
-
renegadeboxing
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 105
- Joined: 26 Mar 2011, 05:15
Have the bboc re Bruce baker gone mad?
Heard from a very good source today that the hearing had the judge, as prosecuter the first day, judge the second day, and also, as a witness??? And when questioned, "we can do what we like, as it's not a criminal court,. Discuss
Re: Have the bboc re Bruce baker gone mad?
renegadeboxing wrote:Heard from a very good source today that the hearing had the judge, as prosecuter the first day, judge the second day, and also, as a witness??? And when questioned, "we can do what we like, as it's not a criminal court,. Discuss
It will be interesting to see what if anything happens now I just carnt understand where Bruce was coming from all the time I would have thought if he wasn't happy with the board he should have handed his licence in and just gone elsewhere instead of hanging around criticising all the time bruce had no right to criticise anybodies regulations when he kept breeching his own regulations in the vast majority of contests for his masters titles
-
renegadeboxing
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 105
- Joined: 26 Mar 2011, 05:15
Re: Have the bboc re Bruce baker gone mad?
I agree with you regards titles, but it was the board took Bruce to court, and withdrew his licence, and if I'm not mistaken, all the boxers / officials that worked his shows, so , Del Boy and haye can't box on bboc shows no more
-
The Insider
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 2581
- Joined: 26 Mar 2012, 11:21
Re: Have the bboc re Bruce baker gone mad?
To Court? Did they? Which shows? Has he promoted any?renegadeboxing wrote:but it was the board took Bruce to court, and withdrew his licence
Last edited by The Insider on 21 Feb 2014, 15:09, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Have the bboc re Bruce baker gone mad?
Yeh Right ? Can't see them being able to do anything there, they have been down that road before.renegadeboxing wrote:I agree with you regards titles, but it was the board took Bruce to court, and withdrew his licence, and if I'm not mistaken, all the boxers / officials that worked his shows, so , Del Boy and haye can't box on bboc shows no more
Re: Have the bboc re Bruce baker gone mad?
He was looking to instigate change and did not really succeed, maybe a place for himself in the new regime, who knows ?spudder56 wrote:renegadeboxing wrote:Heard from a very good source today that the hearing had the judge, as prosecuter the first day, judge the second day, and also, as a witness??? And when questioned, "we can do what we like, as it's not a criminal court,. Discuss
It will be interesting to see what if anything happens now I just carnt understand where Bruce was coming from all the time I would have thought if he wasn't happy with the board he should have handed his licence in and just gone elsewhere instead of hanging around criticising all the time bruce had no right to criticise anybodies regulations when he kept breeching his own regulations in the vast majority of contests for his masters titles
-
followthecamel
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 73
- Joined: 15 Oct 2012, 16:51
Re: Have the bboc re Bruce baker gone mad?
A source today said renegadeboxing makes up his stories!renegadeboxing wrote:Heard from a very good source today that the hearing had the judge, as prosecuter the first day, judge the second day, and also, as a witness??? And when questioned, "we can do what we like, as it's not a criminal court,. Discuss
Re: Have the bboc re Bruce baker gone mad?
The Insider wrote:To Court? Did they? Which shows? Has he promoted any?renegadeboxing wrote:but it was the board took Bruce to court, and withdrew his licence
Spot on insider what has bb done for the sport apart from breech his own regulations and collect sanctioning fees for the masters belts
Re: Have the bboc re Bruce baker gone mad?
He's a leech, not it in for anything other than personal gain, which I suppose could be said for a lot of people in boxing, but at least fighters make promoters, managers and trainers money and they help to guide them to their full potential.spudder56 wrote:The Insider wrote:To Court? Did they? Which shows? Has he promoted any?renegadeboxing wrote:but it was the board took Bruce to court, and withdrew his licence
Spot on insider what has bb done for the sport apart from breech his own regulations and collect sanctioning fees for the masters belts
Re: Have the bboc re Bruce baker gone mad?
WELL SAID EXPE SPOT ON MATE
-
Parson Cross
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1991
- Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57
Re: Have the bboc re Bruce baker gone mad?
Renegade,
Are you talking about a Board hearing or a Court hearing ?
Think your reliable source has got his wires crossed.
Are you talking about a Board hearing or a Court hearing ?
Think your reliable source has got his wires crossed.
-
Callowland
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 408
- Joined: 30 Sep 2011, 17:56
Re: Have the bboc re Bruce baker gone mad?
Spot on insider what has bb done for the sport apart from breech his own regulations and collect sanctioning fees for the masters belts[/quote]
He's a leech, not it in for anything other than personal gain, which I suppose could be said for a lot of people in boxing, but at least fighters make promoters, managers and trainers money and they help to guide them to their full potential.[/quote]
I think Bruce's motives are for fairness for ordinary licence holders. I think the best thing that could happen is for Vitali Klitchsko to come over here and help in taking a stand against the incumbent regime that is called the Board.
He's a leech, not it in for anything other than personal gain, which I suppose could be said for a lot of people in boxing, but at least fighters make promoters, managers and trainers money and they help to guide them to their full potential.[/quote]
I think Bruce's motives are for fairness for ordinary licence holders. I think the best thing that could happen is for Vitali Klitchsko to come over here and help in taking a stand against the incumbent regime that is called the Board.
Re: Have the bboc re Bruce baker gone mad?
He's a leech, not it in for anything other than personal gain, which I suppose could be said for a lot of people in boxing, but at least fighters make promoters, managers and trainers money and they help to guide them to their full potential.[/quote]Callowland wrote:Spot on insider what has bb done for the sport apart from breech his own regulations and collect sanctioning fees for the masters belts
I think Bruce's motives are for fairness for ordinary licence holders. I think the best thing that could happen is for Vitali Klitchsko to come over here and help in taking a stand against the incumbent regime that is called the Board.[/quote]
IMO Bruce's only interest is self interest
-
Callowland
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 408
- Joined: 30 Sep 2011, 17:56
Re: Have the bboc re Bruce baker gone mad?
IMO Bruce's only interest is self interest[/quote]
What interests do the Board hold. Profit?
I hope Bruce appeals and is victorious.
What interests do the Board hold. Profit?
I hope Bruce appeals and is victorious.
-
renegadeboxing
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 105
- Joined: 26 Mar 2011, 05:15
Re: Have the bboc re Bruce baker gone mad?
My source is As inside as you can get camelwiththehump, I'd love to make up stories for your amusement, but I don't think you'd have the intellect, of humor to find things funny ;)followthecamel wrote:A source today said renegadeboxing makes up his stories!renegadeboxing wrote:Heard from a very good source today that the hearing had the judge, as prosecuter the first day, judge the second day, and also, as a witness??? And when questioned, "we can do what we like, as it's not a criminal court,. Discuss
-
Callowland
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 408
- Joined: 30 Sep 2011, 17:56
Re: Have the bboc re Bruce baker gone mad?
A source today said renegadeboxing makes up his stories![/quote]
My source is As inside as you can get camelwiththehump, I'd love to make up stories for your amusement, but I don't think you'd have the intellect, of humor to find things funny ;)[/quote]
For the Board officials that may be commenting here to upbold the 'good' name of the Board, Renegade boxing's sources are genuine.
My source is As inside as you can get camelwiththehump, I'd love to make up stories for your amusement, but I don't think you'd have the intellect, of humor to find things funny ;)[/quote]
For the Board officials that may be commenting here to upbold the 'good' name of the Board, Renegade boxing's sources are genuine.
Re: Have the bboc re Bruce baker gone mad?
My source is As inside as you can get camelwiththehump, I'd love to make up stories for your amusement, but I don't think you'd have the intellect, of humor to find things funny ;)[/quote]Callowland wrote:A source today said renegadeboxing makes up his stories!
For the Board officials that may be commenting here to upbold the 'good' name of the Board, Renegade boxing's sources are genuine.[/quote]
Carnt believe that his sources are genuine but if they are the scumbag giving the info needs exposing not quoting IMO
Re: Have the bboc re Bruce baker gone mad?
My source is As inside as you can get camelwiththehump, I'd love to make up stories for your amusement, but I don't think you'd have the intellect, of humor to find things funny ;)[/quote]Callowland wrote:A source today said renegadeboxing makes up his stories!
For the Board officials that may be commenting here to upbold the 'good' name of the Board, Renegade boxing's sources are genuine.[/quote]
Board officials should not be on forums, conflict of interest, not to mention the possibility of leading to corruption in the sport, officials should always remain totally unbiased and by interacting with members and fans alike, that position can be compromised.
-
Callowland
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 408
- Joined: 30 Sep 2011, 17:56
Re: Have the bboc re Bruce baker gone mad?
Board officials should not be on forums, conflict of interest, not to mention the possibility of leading to corruption in the sport, officials should always remain totally unbiased and by interacting with members and fans alike, that position can be compromised.[/quote]
Agreed, but I am sure curiosity will get the better of them, especially on a thread like this about their 'democratic' procedures.
Agreed, but I am sure curiosity will get the better of them, especially on a thread like this about their 'democratic' procedures.
Re: Have the bboc re Bruce baker gone mad?
Agreed, but I am sure curiosity will get the better of them, especially on a thread like this about their 'democratic' procedures.[/quote]trueCallowland wrote:Board officials should not be on forums, conflict of interest, not to mention the possibility of leading to corruption in the sport, officials should always remain totally unbiased and by interacting with members and fans alike, that position can be compromised.
-
renegadeboxing
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 105
- Joined: 26 Mar 2011, 05:15
Re: Have the bboc re Bruce baker gone mad?
So, how many courts would let you be judge, jury, and witness all on the same trial?
-
The Insider
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 2581
- Joined: 26 Mar 2012, 11:21
Re: Have the bboc re Bruce baker gone mad?
Which court did the hearing take place at?renegadeboxing wrote:So, how many courts would let you be judge, jury, and witness all on the same trial?
-
Callowland
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 408
- Joined: 30 Sep 2011, 17:56
Re: Have the bboc re Bruce baker gone mad?
I think he means the actual hearing where the Board acts as Judge, Jury and Executioner as allegedly saix whe Chisora lost his licence.The Insider wrote:Which court did the hearing take place at?renegadeboxing wrote:So, how many courts would let you be judge, jury, and witness all on the same trial?
If that's the case, and the same happened to Bruce Baker, everyone needs to know.
Re: Have the bboc re Bruce baker gone mad?
Because Bruce Baker finally had his license taken away it's some sort of major event? Until he removes the masters titles and any involvement with Luxembourg, Malta and the GBA, he shouldn't get it back.Callowland wrote:I think he means the actual hearing where the Board acts as Judge, Jury and Executioner as allegedly saix whe Chisora lost his licence.The Insider wrote:Which court did the hearing take place at?renegadeboxing wrote:So, how many courts would let you be judge, jury, and witness all on the same trial?
If that's the case, and the same happened to Bruce Baker, everyone needs to know.
-
The Insider
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 2581
- Joined: 26 Mar 2012, 11:21
Re: Have the bboc re Bruce baker gone mad?
Oh right so it wasn't an actual legal court of the land.Callowland wrote:
I think he means the actual hearing where the Board acts as Judge, Jury and Executioner as allegedly saix whe Chisora lost his licence.
If that's the case, and the same happened to Bruce Baker, everyone needs to know.
Who exactly should hear his case then if He's breaking BBBoC rules?