Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

ste1983
Middleweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 01 Oct 2013, 10:30

Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Post by ste1983 »

just confirmed for the Hall v Ward bill in Newcastle, 10 rounds according to Steve Lillis
mullenman
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1124
Joined: 23 Oct 2012, 11:10

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Post by mullenman »

good fight!!!
ste1983
Middleweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 01 Oct 2013, 10:30

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Post by ste1983 »

very interesting crossroads fight in my opinion.

if Mcclosky loses where does he go from here?
mullenman
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1124
Joined: 23 Oct 2012, 11:10

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Post by mullenman »

to the scrap yard for mcclosky if he loses this fight
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Post by JimJim2009 »

That's a really good match up. I don't believe it will happen but I hope it does
digzee
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1582
Joined: 11 Nov 2008, 13:49

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Post by digzee »

Just what Bradley needs, a good step up but it will be hard to look good against Mcclosky he's so awkward. Cant wait for this one.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23192
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Post by mickey1975 »

Brad will win this. He's a top domestic fighter already, just hasn't had enough fights to prove it.
pyenest77
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1491
Joined: 29 Sep 2009, 15:14

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Post by pyenest77 »

Saunders wins quite easy for me.
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5523
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Post by forcefraser »

This could spell the end for Mccloskey.
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Post by JimJim2009 »

mickey1975 wrote:Brad will win this. He's a top domestic fighter already, just hasn't had enough fights to prove it.
Agreed.

I hope to see more of this sort of match making. Frankie Gavin is moving so slowly I'm amazed they didn't offer McCloskey to him instead.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Post by expe »

JimJim2009 wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:Brad will win this. He's a top domestic fighter already, just hasn't had enough fights to prove it.
Agreed.

I hope to see more of this sort of match making. Frankie Gavin is moving so slowly I'm amazed they didn't offer McCloskey to him instead.
He's already got the Lonsdale belt outright and McCloskey doesn't have any world rankings, definitely not with the WBO, so the fight wouldn't really get him anywhere and it could be a bit boring, I don't think the styles would come together well.
tear up
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1832
Joined: 06 Dec 2010, 12:25

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Post by tear up »

Think Paul s nearly at the end of a fine career brad will hit to hard for him and feel a stoppage is on the cards
tedley
Middleweight
Posts: 150
Joined: 19 Sep 2013, 06:28

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Post by tedley »

I hope it is last on the bill then McClosky can ensure everyone gets a good nights sleep
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Post by whiskey »

I think Saunders stops McCloskey.

Amazing to think only recently he was being linked with Juan Manuel Marquez wasn't it ?
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5523
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Post by forcefraser »

There was a lot of hype around Mccloskey for a while. He floored a guy who wasnt looking and then took a pasting from Prescott but was gifted a decision.

Has he actually beaten a genuinely dangerous fighter yet?
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9661
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Post by steve689 »

Took a pasting from Prescott and got a gift decision...are you pissed? I was ringside for that one and it was a close, close fight. He got his nose busted in the sixth and showed tremendous courage and bravery to push Prescott back. He was never a come forward fighter either so that was even more impressive.

The problem with that fight was that it was effectively McCloskey's world title fight, only without the belt to show for it. He put his heart and soul into winning that and was spent and demotivated when he lost to Corley a few months' later.
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Post by JimJim2009 »

expe wrote:
JimJim2009 wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:Brad will win this. He's a top domestic fighter already, just hasn't had enough fights to prove it.
Agreed.

I hope to see more of this sort of match making. Frankie Gavin is moving so slowly I'm amazed they didn't offer McCloskey to him instead.
He's already got the Lonsdale belt outright and McCloskey doesn't have any world rankings, definitely not with the WBO, so the fight wouldn't really get him anywhere and it could be a bit boring, I don't think the styles would come together well.
I was being a bit sarcastic there Expe. This is great match-making for Saunders, so credit where its due, but Gavin's opposition has been disappointing and some of the poor choice opponents have brought out the worst in Frankie, rather than the best. For the life of me I don't understand why they don't bring over some Mexicans or South Americans, it would make for more exciting fights and would showcase Frankie's skills properly.

This is great match making for Saunders. At the rate they're going with Frankie he'll soon be fighting Peter McDonagh again.
tear up
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1832
Joined: 06 Dec 2010, 12:25

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Post by tear up »

One fight I'd of loved to watch all northeast derby Glenn foot and brad get it on but won't happen now
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Post by expe »

JimJim2009 wrote:
expe wrote:
JimJim2009 wrote:
Agreed.

I hope to see more of this sort of match making. Frankie Gavin is moving so slowly I'm amazed they didn't offer McCloskey to him instead.
He's already got the Lonsdale belt outright and McCloskey doesn't have any world rankings, definitely not with the WBO, so the fight wouldn't really get him anywhere and it could be a bit boring, I don't think the styles would come together well.
I was being a bit sarcastic there Expe. This is great match-making for Saunders, so credit where its due, but Gavin's opposition has been disappointing and some of the poor choice opponents have brought out the worst in Frankie, rather than the best. For the life of me I don't understand why they don't bring over some Mexicans or South Americans, it would make for more exciting fights and would showcase Frankie's skills properly.

This is great match making for Saunders. At the rate they're going with Frankie he'll soon be fighting Peter McDonagh again.
He'd look brilliant against the South Americans, come forward fighters are perfect for Frankie, make them miss, then pick them off all night.
IRLangmaid25
Cruiserweight
Posts: 3316
Joined: 01 Feb 2010, 19:08

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Post by IRLangmaid25 »

Winner pushing for the British title perhaps, Saunders the guy coming up withMcCloskey looking to rebuild after an eight round upset loss knows that if he loses to Saunders he will be pretty done for at British level. Definitely a tough pick but the younger and fresher Saunders takes this, but it won't be easy.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23192
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Post by mickey1975 »

Mcloskey has pulled out.
slapbangwhallop
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2031
Joined: 13 Dec 2010, 08:27

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Post by slapbangwhallop »

forcefraser wrote:There was a lot of hype around Mccloskey for a while. He floored a guy who wasnt looking and then took a pasting from Prescott but was gifted a decision.

Has he actually beaten a genuinely dangerous fighter yet?
Talk about revisionism!! Haha
digzee
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1582
Joined: 11 Nov 2008, 13:49

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Post by digzee »

mickey1975 wrote:Mcloskey has pulled out.
When I saw there was a new message on this thread I knew 100% this was what it was, typical, I guess we should have known better.... What now for Saunders? An eastern European?
mainman
Middleweight
Posts: 20
Joined: 23 Oct 2013, 21:31

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Post by mainman »

digzee wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:Mcloskey has pulled out.
What now for Saunders? An eastern European?
you forgot to add eastern european 'BUM'.. or 'journeyman' ..... that hasnt fought for long who is paid to get beat up

seeing as though russia and ukraine are probably the best nations in boxing right now for producing talent, eastern europe has many brilliant boxers

to just say 'eastern euro' is disrespectful and incorrect in the way you are using it

you should really say ' afrobum' seeing as though the whole continent of africa is hilariously embarassingly awful at boxing
digzee
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1582
Joined: 11 Nov 2008, 13:49

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Post by digzee »

mainman wrote:
digzee wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:Mcloskey has pulled out.
What now for Saunders? An eastern European?
you forgot to add eastern european 'BUM'.. or 'journeyman' ..... that hasnt fought for long who is paid to get beat up

seeing as though russia and ukraine are probably the best nations in boxing right now for producing talent, eastern europe has many brilliant boxers

to just say 'eastern euro' is disrespectful and incorrect in the way you are using it

you should really say ' afrobum' seeing as though the whole continent of africa is hilariously embarassingly awful at boxing
Yep true my bad, that's what I meant :salut:
Post Reply